References
- 권용주, 정진수, 강민정, 김영신(2003). 과학적 가설 지식 생성 과정에 대한 바탕 이론. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), 458-469.
- 박종원(2000). 학생의 과학적 설명 가설의 생성과정 분석: 과학적 가설의 정의와 특성을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(4), 667-679.
- 오필석(2008). 지구과학자와 대학생들의 가설 형성 과정 비교: 태풍의 이상 경로에 대한 사례를 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(6), 649-663.
- 오필석, 김찬종(2005). 지구과학의 한 탐구 방법으로서 귀추법에 대한 이론적 고찰. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(5), 610-623.
- Baker, V. R. (1996). Hypotheses and geomorphological reasoning. In B. L. Rhoads & C. E. Thorn (Ed.), The scientific nature of geomorphology (pp. 57-85). New York: Wiley.
- Baker, V. R. (2000). Conversing with the earth: The geological approach to understanding. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), Earth matters: The earth sciences, philosophy, and the claims of the community (pp. 2-10). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
- Blachowicz, J. (1989). Discovery and ampliative inference. Philosophy of Science, 56(3), 438-462. https://doi.org/10.1086/289500
- Clement, J. J. (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Crawford, B. A. (2000). Enhancing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
- Darden, L. (1992). Strategies in anomaly resolution. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp 251-273). Minneapolis, MN: University Minnesota Press.
- Engelhardt, W. von, & Zimmermann, J. (1988). Theory of earth science (translated by L. Fisher). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Frodeman, R. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. GSA Bulletin, 107(8), 960-968. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107<0960:GRGAAI>2.3.CO;2
- Giere, R. N., Bickle, J., & Mauldin, R. F. (2006). Understanding scientific reasoning (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
- Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods 10(4), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
- Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Kim, C.-J. (2003). Preparing teachers for systems science methodology. In V. J. Mayer (Ed.), Implementing global science literacy (pp. 255-266). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
- Kleinhans, M., Buskes, C. J. J., & de Regt, H. W. (2005). Terra Incognita: Explanation and reduction in earth science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 19(3), 289-317. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590500462356
- Kordig, C. R. (1978). Discovery and justification. Philosophy of Science, 45, 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1086/288782
- Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
- Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Laudan, L. (1981). Science and hypothesis: Historical essays on scientific methodology. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
- Leach, J. (1999). Students'understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), 789-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290291
- Levin, H. L., & Smith, M. S. (2008). Laboratory studies in earth history (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
- Magnani, L. (2001). Abduction, reason, and science: Process of discovery and explanation. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
- Nickles, T. (1980). Scientific discovery: Cases studies. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
- Oh, P. S. (2008). Adopting the abductive inquiry model (AIM) into undergraduate earth science laboratories. In I. V. Eriksson (Ed.), Science education in the 21st century (pp. 263-277). New York: Nova.
- Oh, P. S. (2010). How can teachers help students formulate scientific hypotheses? Some strategies found in abductive inquiry activities of earth science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 541-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104457
- Oh, P. S. (in press). Characteristics of abductive inquiry in earth science: An undergraduate case study. Science Education.
- Roth, W.-M. (1996). Teacher questioning in an open-inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(7), 709-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<709::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-R
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. B. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92, 447-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students'use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Thayer, H. S. (1953). Newton's philosophy of nature: Selections from his writing. New York: Hafner Press.
- Walton, D. (2004). Abductive reasoning. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.