The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Patients satisfaction for implant supported overdenture with small diameter implant

작은 직경 임플란트를 이용한 임플란트 지지 피개의치에 대한 환자 만족도 조사

  • Lee, Sang-Yeup (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Dae-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Paek, Jang-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Kung-Rock (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • 이상엽 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 최대균 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 백장현 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 권긍록 (경희대학교 대학원 치의학과 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2010.12.09
  • Accepted : 2011.01.08
  • Published : 2011.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: In cases when implant supported overdenture is made by using standard size implant, additional procedure such as bone surgery and bone grafting can be required. And it gives burden to doctor and patient in terms of cost. Therefore, it is necessary to find the implant therapy for the edentulous patients in making denture with accordable cost and simple procedure. Materials and methods: Edentulous patients with upper and lower dentures participated in this study. Before the operation, survey about patient's satisfaction to the existing dentures was carried out. Surgical procedures included four small diameter implants installation anterior area and immediate loading. One and three month after the procedure, the same survey about patient's satisfaction was carried out, and radiography was taken. Results: We are doing research to the nine patients. Survival rate is 97.2 percent. The comparison of patient's satisfaction before and after surgery is performed based on oral health impact profile 49. We analyze mainly with masticatory discomfort, retention, aesthetics, social problem, psychological discomfort problems. As a result, satisfaction level is increased at all factors. Retention is the most increased satisfactory factor followed by mastication difficulty, pronunciation, psychological discomfort, social discomfort, aesthetics in order. Marginal bone loss is 0.21 mm at 12 weeks after implant placement. Conclusion: This research reveals that the denture supported by mini dental implant increases patient's satisfaction. This study will be continued with more patients for a long time and we are scheduled for taking additional radiography to check whether peri-implant bone resorption occurs or not.

연구 목적: 양악 총의치를 사용 중인 환자를 대상으로 하악에 4개의 작은 직경의 임플란트를 식립하여 implant supported overdenture로 전환 시 환자의 만족도 (저작, 유지, 발음, 심미, 사회적 문제, 심리적 문제)를 평가하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 60세 이상의 완전 무치악 환자 중 상하악 총의치를 장착한 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 수술 전에 진단 스텐트를 이용한 방사선 사진 (CT, panorama) 촬영을 시행하고 현재 사용하고 있는 의치에 대한 만족도에 대해 조사하였다. 그 후 하악 이공 전방부에 4개의 mini dental implant 식립 및 immediate loading 후 방사선 사진 촬영을 하였다. 식립 1달 후와 3달 후에 방사선 사진을 촬영하였으며 수술 전과 동일한 설문지를 통한 overdenture 사용 시 만족도 조사하였다. 결과: 현재 9명의 환자를 대상으로 시행하였다. 1. 총 36개의 임플란트를 식립하였으며 이중 1개의 임플란트가 실패하여 97.2%의 생존률을 보였다. 2. 임플란트 식립 전, 후 만족도 비교는 oral health impact profile 49를 이용한 설문 조사를 통해 이루어 졌다. 저작 시 불편감, 유지, 발음, 심미, 사회적 활동시 불편감, 심리적 불편감 등으로 비교 분석하였으며 5점 기준으로 불편감이 심할 수록 낮은 점수를 부여하였다. 그 결과 전반적으로 만족도가 상승하였다. 그 중 유지력 면에서 가장 크게 만족도가 상승하였으며 사회활동시 불편감, 심리적 불편감, 저작시 불편감, 심미, 발음 순으로 개선되었다. 결론: 이번 연구를 통하여 mini dental implant를 이용한 의치를 사용시 환자의 만족도가 높아진 것을 볼 수 있었다. 추 후 좀 더 많은 환자를 통해 장기간 연구를 할 예정이며 추가적인 방사선 사진을 촬영하여 임플란트 주위 골 소실 여부를 관찰할 예정이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, Brown LJ. Denture use and the technical quality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:714-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/002203459607502S11
  2. Tarbet WJ, Boone M, Schmidt NF. Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:374-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90092-X
  3. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van't Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195-201. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x
  4. Banton B, Henry MD. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique. J Dent Technol 1997;14:14-20.
  5. Flanagan D. Implant-supported fixed prosthetic treatment using very small-diameter implants: a case report. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:34- 7. https://doi.org/10.1563/778.1
  6. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW. Ten-year longitudinal study of masticatory function in edentulous patients treated with fixed complete dentures on osseointegrated implants. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:448- 53.
  7. Sendax VI. Mini-implants as adjuncts for transitional prostheses. Dent Implantol Update 1996;7:12-5.
  8. Gibney JW. Minimally invasive implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:73-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0073:MIIS>2.3.CO;2
  9. Horiuchi K, Uchida H, Yamamoto K, Sugimura M. Immediate loading of Branemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:824-30.
  10. Porter JM. Same-day restoration of mandibular single-stage implants. J Indiana Dent Assoc 2002;81:22-5.
  11. Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:703-9.
  12. Christensen GJ. The 'mini'-implant has arrived. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:387-90. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0189
  13. Choi R. Incorporating mini-implants within the general dental practice. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007;19:1-5.
  14. Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:32-7. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0032:MIIWTA>2.3.CO;2
  15. English CE, Bohle GC. Diagnostic, procedural and clinical issues with Sendax mini dental implant. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:3-25.
  16. Lekholm U, Zarb GA: Patient selection and preparation. In: Braemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds): Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence; Chicago; 1985. pp. 199-209.
  17. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994;11:3-11.
  18. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
  19. Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:81- 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.018
  20. Shatkin TE, Shatkin S, Oppenheimer BD, Oppenheimer AJ. Mini dental implants for long-term fixed and removable prosthetics: a retrospective analysis of 2514 implants placed over a five-year period. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:92-9.
  21. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001012.x
  22. Dilek O, Tezulas E, Dincel M. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:20-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.10.003
  23. Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53: 1167-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90627-4
  24. JofreJ, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:243-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01834.x
  25. Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:91-100.
  26. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  27. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-98. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.186
  28. Kim JW, Kim HS, Baik J, Kwon KR. Novel treatment modality of implant-retained overdenture for immediate function in completely edentulous patients. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:34- 47.