The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the shear bond strength between Co-Cr denture base and relining materials

금속의치상과 의치이장재료 간의 결합력에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Na-Young (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Doo-Yong (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 이나영 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김두용 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 박원희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.09.08
  • Accepted : 2010.10.11
  • Published : 2011.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the bonding strength of direct relining resin to Co-Cr denture base material according to surface treatment and immersion time. Materials and methods: In this study, Co-Cr alloy was used in hexagon shape. Each specimen was cut in flat surface, and sandblasted with $110\;{\mu}m$ $Al_2O_3$ for 1 minute. 54 specimens were divided into 3 groups; group A-control group, group B-applied with surface primer A, group C-applied with surface primer B. Self curing direct resin was used for this study. Each group was subdivided into another 3 groups according to the immersion time. After the wetting storage, shear bond strength of the specimens were measured with universal testing machine. The data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc method. Results: In experiment of sandblasting specimens, surface roughness of the alloy was the highest after 1 minute sandblasting. In experiment of testing shear bond strength, bonding strength was lowered on group B, C, A. There were significant differences between 3 groups. According to period, Bonding strength was the highest on 0 week storage group, and the weakest on 2 week storage group. But there were no significant differences between 3 periods. According to group and period, bonding strength of all group were lowered according to immersion time but there were no significant differences on group B and group C, but there was significant difference according to immersion time on group A. Conclusion: It is useful to sandblast and adopt metal primers when relining Co-Cr metal base dentures in chair-side.

연구 목적: 본 연구의 목적은 금속 의치상 재료에 직접법으로 이장을 시행했을 때 표면처리와 시간에 따른 결합강도의 변화를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Co-Cr 시편을 최대직경 9 mm의 육각기둥 형태로 절삭하여 제작하였으며, $110\;{\mu}m$의 $Al_2O_3$로 1분간 sandblasting 하였다. 시편을 18개씩 3군으로 나누어 A군은 화학적 처리 없이, B, C군은 금속표면처리제 (MR $bond^{(R)}$, Alloy $primer^{(R)}$)를 도포한 후 7 mm직경의 자가 중합형 이장용 레진 (Vertex $SC^{(R)}$) 기둥을 부착하였다. 각각의 그룹을 다시3군으로 나누어 수분 하에서 다른 기간 (0주, 1주, 2주)동안 저장한 다음 만능역학 실험기계 (Instron)를 이용하여 시편을 분리하였고, 분리되는 시점의 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 통계처리는 two-way ANOVA와 Tukey 방법을 이용하여 5% 유의수준에서 분석하였다. 결과: 시편을 sandblasting한 실험에서는, 1분 동안 sandblasting 한 시편의 표면 거칠기가 가장 크게 나타났다. 전단결합강도 실험에서 결합강도는 B, C, A군의 순서로 낮아졌으며, 이 세 군 사이에 유의성 있는 차이를 보였다. 기간별로 봤을 때 결합강도는 수분에 저장하지 않은 군에서 가장 높았으며 2주 동안 수분에 저장한 군에서 가장 낮았으나 기간별로 유의성 있는 차이는 보이지 않았다. 기간과 군을 함께 고려했을 때 모든 군에서 침수 시간이 길어짐에 따라 결합강도가 낮아졌으나B군과C군에서 임상적인 유의성은 보이지 않았고, A군에서만 유의성 있게 결합강도가 낮아졌다. 결론:Co-Cr 금속 의치상에 진료실에서 직접법으로 이장을 할 경우 적절한 기계적 처리 (Sandblasting) 후 금속 표면 처리제를 도포하는 것이 유리할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon KR, Kim YS, Kim CH, Kim HJ,Moon HS, Park SW, Park CJ, Song KY, Lee JS, Lee CH, Lim YJ, Chung MK, Jeong JH, Jeong CM, Cho IH, Cho HW, Choi DG, Han JH. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. $1^{st}$ ed. Seoul; Shinhung international; 2007. pp. 369-75, 432-40.
  2. McGivney GP, Carr AB. McCracken's removable partial prosthodontics. $10^{th}$ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 2000. pp. 451-5.
  3. Brudvik JS. Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 1980. pp. 457.
  4. Re GJ, Kaiser DA, Malone WF, Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strengths and scanning electron microscope evaluation of three different retentive methods for resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:568-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90071-6
  5. Krueger GE, Diaz-Arnold AM, Aquilino SA, Scandrett FR. A comparison of electrolytic and chemical etch systems on the resin-tometal tensile bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:610-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90137-2
  6. Livaditis GJ. A chemical etching system for creating micromechanical retention in resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:181- 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90468-3
  7. Doukoudakis A, Cohen B, Tsoutsos A. A new chemical method for etching metal frameworks of the acid-etched prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:421-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90267-8
  8. Sedberry D, Burgess J, Schwartz R. Tensile bond strengths of three chemical and one electrolytic etching systems for a base metal alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:606-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90373-I
  9. Zurasky JE, Duke ES. Improved adhesion of denture acrylic resins to base metal alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:520-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90028-X
  10. Garfield RE. An effective method for relining metal-based prostheses with acid-etch techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:719-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90424-4
  11. Tanaka T, Atsuta M, Nakabayashi N, Masuhara E. Surface treatment of gold alloys for adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:271-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90267-3
  12. Naegeli DG, Duke ES, Schwartz R, Norling BK. Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60: 279-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90268-5
  13. Lyzak WA, Chang JC. Relining a cast palatal denture with a 4-META resin bonding system. Gen Dent 1995;43:46-8.
  14. Chang JC, Connelly ME, Barclay SM. Relining dentures with metal bases. Am J Dent 1993;6:53-4.
  15. Park HJ, Kim CW, Kim YS. A study on the flexural bond strength of the gold and the Co-Cr alloy to the denture base resins. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:500-9.
  16. Caeg C, Leinfelder KF, Lacefield WR, Bell W. Effectiveness of a method used in bonding resins to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:37- 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90150-B
  17. Jacobson TE, Chang JC, Keri PP, Watanabe LG. Bond strength of 4-META acrylic resin denture base to cobalt chromium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:570-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90216-8
  18. Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90001-7
  19. Eom TW, Chang IT. The effects of metal surface treatments on the bone strength of polymethyl methacrylate bonded removable prosthese. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:336-54.
  20. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. The shear strength of polymethyl methacrylate bonded to titanium partial denture framework material. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:410-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90076-Z
  21. Kolodney H, Puckett AD, Brown K. Shear strength of laboratory- processed composite resins bonded to a silane-coated nickelchromium- beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:419-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90262-9
  22. van Dalen A, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. The influence of surface treatment and luting cement on in vitro behavior of two-unit cantilever resin-bonded bridges. Dent Mater 2005;21:625-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.004
  23. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Takaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhesion-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:456-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90176-9
  24. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of denture base resins to nickel-chromium-beryllium removable partial denture alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:566- 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70007-6
  25. Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of a cobaltchromium alloy with acidic primers and tri-n-butylborane-initiated luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:194-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90306-6
  26. NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Comparison of bond strengths of three denture base resins to treated nickelchromium- beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:354-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70137-4
  27. Lee JS, Lim JH, Cho IH. A study on the tensile strength between metal denture base and relining materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2000;38:1-11.
  28. Lee SH, Hwang SH, Moon HS, Lee KW, Shim JS. Shear bond strength of heat-cured denture base resin to surface treated Co-Cr alloy with different methods. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:216-27.
  29. Yoshida K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of adhesive metal primers on bonding a prosthetic composite resin to metals. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:357-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90180-V
  30. Watanabe I, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of two metal primers on adhesive bonding with type IV gold alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:299-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80209-4

Cited by

  1. Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin vol.7, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.392