Journal of Korean Dental Science

  • 제4권2호
  • /
  • Pages.59-66
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2005-4742(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-7651(eISSN)
대한치의학회 (Korean Academy of Dental Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective Study of Bone Resorption after Maxillary Sinus Bone Graft

  • Moon, Ji-A (Department of Dental Science, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Min-Sung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seung-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.25
  • 심사 : 2011.12.08
  • 발행 : 2011.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This research sought to determine the resorption rate of bone grafted to the maxillary sinus according to the grafted material's type, patient's age, systemic disease, implant size, site of implant placement, and residual ridge height. Materials and Methods: This research targeted 24 patients who had immediate Osstem$^{(R)}$ implant (US Plus$^{(R)}$) placement after bone graft. The panorama was taken before the surgery, after the surgery, and 6 months after the surgery. Vertical height change and resorption rate of the grafted bone were measured with the same X-rays and compared. The influence of the following factors on the grafted bone material's resorption rate was evaluated: grafted material type, patient's age, systemic disease, implant size, site of implant placement, and residual ridge height. Results: Patients in their 40s had $34.0{\pm}21.1%$ resorption rate, which was significantly higher compared to the other age groups (P<0.05). There was no significant relationship between systemic disease and grafted bone resorption. There was no significant relationship between implant size (diameter, length) and grafted bone resorption. There was no significant relationship between the site of implant placement and grafted bone resorption. The ramal bone-grafted site was significantly more resorbed than the ramal bone/Bio-Oss$^{(R)}$-grafted site, maxillary tuberosity bone/Bio-Oss$^{(R)}$-grafted site, and ramal bone/maxillary tuberosity bone/Bio-Oss$^{(R)}$-grafted site (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the grafted bone resorption rate in the sinus between more than 4 mm and less than 4 mm residual ridge heights. After an average of 6 months, a second surgery was done; given an average follow-up of 1.9 years, the success rate and survival rate of the implant were 96.9% and 98.4%, respectively. Conclusion: These results indicate that the bone resorption rate of grafted bone among patients in their 40s is higher compared to patients in their 50s and over, and that only autogenous bone (ramus) shows higher resorption rate than the mixed graft of autogenous bone and xenogenous graft (Bio-oss) after maxillary sinus graft.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38: 613-6.
  2. Mellonig JT, Bowers GM, Bailey RC. Comparison of bone graft materials. Part I. New bone formation with autografts and allografts determined by Strontium-85. J Periodontol. 1981; 52: 291-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1981.52.6.291
  3. Dragoo MR, Sullivan HC. A clinical and histological evaluation of autogenous iliac bone grafts in humans. I. Wound healing 2 to 8 months. J Periodontol. 1973; 44: 599-613. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1973.44.10.599
  4. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 339-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  5. Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K, Hirsch JM. A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Den tomaxillofac Radiol. 2001; 30: 157-61. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600601
  6. Smolka W, Eggensperger N, Carollo V, Ozdoba C, Iizuka T. Changes in the volume and density of calvarial split bone grafts after alveolar ridge augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17: 149-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01182.x
  7. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 767-76.
  8. Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten Bruggenkate CM. Longterm changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20: 691-700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01697.x
  9. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13 Suppl: 11-45.
  10. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histo morphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6: 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060103.x
  11. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1: 11-25.
  12. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, Pecora G, Piattelli M, Orsini G, Caputi S, Perrotti V, Mangano C, Piattelli A. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent. 2006; 15: 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000220120.54308.f3
  13. Kim YK, Yun PY, Im JH. Clinical retrospective study of sinus bone graft and implant placement. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 30: 249-57.
  14. Maiorana C, Sigurtà D, Mirandola A, Garlini G, Santoro F. Sinus elevation with alloplasts or xenogenic materials and implants: an up-to- 4-year clinical and radiologic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 426-32.
  15. Misch CM. Ridge augmentation using mandibular ramus bone grafts for the placement of dental implants: presentation of a technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996; 8: 127-35.
  16. Raghoebar GM, Batenburg RH, Vissink A, Reintsema H. Augmentation of localized defects of the anterior maxillary ridge with autogenous bone before insertion of implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 54: 1180-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90346-8
  17. Graziani F, Ducci F, Tonelli M, El Askary AS, Monier M, Gabriele M. Maxillary sinus augmentation with platelet-rich plasma and fibrinogen cryoprecipitate: a tomographic pilot study. Implant Dent. 2005; 14: 63-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000156387.35521.bf
  18. Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M. The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64: 277-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.031
  19. Cheong CS, Cho BH, Hwang DS, Jung YH, Naa KS. Evaluation of maxillary sinus using cone-beam CT in patients scheduled for dental implant in maxillary posterior area. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 35: 21-5.
  20. Pikos MA. Maxillary sinus membrane repair: report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent. 1999; 8: 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199901000-00003
  21. Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartz-Arad D. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21: 103-10.
  22. Kim BJ, Lee JH. The retrospective study of survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 36: 108-18. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.2.108
  23. Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Nkenke E, Thorwarth M, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA. Onlay augmentation versus sinuslift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year comparative longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 34: 885-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.026