DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physical and Structural Characteristics of Endosperm Starch of Four Local Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L.) Collections in Korea

  • Kim, Sang-Kuk (Division of Crop Science, Gyeongsangbuk-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Dong (National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA) ;
  • Ryu, Jung-Gi (Division of Crop Science, Gyeongsangbuk-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services) ;
  • Choi, Hong-Jib (Division of Crop Science, Gyeongsangbuk-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Mo (Division of Plant Biosciences, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, In-Jung (Division of Plant Biosciences, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2011.08.02
  • Accepted : 2011.09.15
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

Physical and structural characteristics of four local barnyardgrass flour and starch were investigated. Amylose content ranged from 6.9 to 12.5%. The BP 3563 and BP 3606 were low amylose lines, and the BP 3592 and BP 3610 showed very low amylose lines. Peak viscosities of four barnyardgrass collections BP-3563, BP-3592, BP-3606, and BP-3610 ranged 264 to 2397. All barnyard grass lines displayed an A-type X-ray diffraction pattern showing the strong diffraction peak at around $2{\theta}$ values $15^{\circ}$, $17^{\circ}$, $18^{\circ}$ and $23^{\circ}$, and a small peak at $20^{\circ}$ $2{\theta}$. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the starch granule sizes ranged $5.5-12.5{\mu}m$ in diameter showing polygonal and rarely spherical in shape with round edges and some pores at the surface. Starch crystallinity of BP 3563, BP 3592, BP 3606, and BP 3610 was 23.9, 25.0, 24.7, and 25.5%, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggarwal, V., N. Singh, S. S. Kamboj and P. S. Brar. 2004. Some properties of seeds and starches separated from different Indian pea cultivars. Food Chem. 85 : 585-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.07.036
  2. Badenhuizen, N. P. 1969. The biogenesis of starch granules in higher plants. New York, Appleton Crofts.
  3. Fujimoto, S., C. Kuroki, A. Nagakura, T. Suganuma and T. Nagahama. 1986. Starches from Chikara-shiba (Pennisetum alopecuroides), Enokoro-gusa (Setaria viridis) and Ta-inu-bie (Echinochoa crus-galli var. oryzicola). J. Jpn. Soc. Starch Sci. 33 : 34-39. https://doi.org/10.5458/jag1972.33.34
  4. Fujita, N., A. Kubo, D. S. Suh, K. S. Wong, J. L. Jane, K. Ozawa, F. Takaiwa, Y. Inaba and Y. Nakamura. 2003. Antisense inhibition of isoamylase alters the structure of amylopectin and the physicochemical properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 44 : 607-618. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcg079
  5. Grelda A., Yanez-Farias, G. A., Moreno-Valencia, J. G., Falcon-Villa, M. R and Barron-Hoyos, J. M. 1997. Isolation and Partial Characterization of Starches from Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), Grown in Sonora, Mexico. Starch 49(9) : 341-345. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19970490904
  6. Holm, L. G., D. L. Plucknett, J. V. Pancho and J. P. Herberger. 1977. The world's worst weeds: distribution and biology. University Press, Hawaii, Honolulu.
  7. Leeiarathi, K., D. Indrani and J. S. Sidhu. 1987. Amylograph pasting behavior of cereal and tuber starches. Starch 39 : 378-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.19870391103
  8. Mali, L., B. S. S. Silene and P. C. Marney. 2003. New starches for the food industry: Curcuma longa and Curcuma zedoaria. Carbohydrate Polymers 50 : 385-386.
  9. Morris, V. J. 1990. Starch gelation and retrogradation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1 : 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(90)90002-G
  10. Noda, T., Y. Takahata, T. Sato, I. Suda, T. Morishitta and K. Ishiguro. 1998. Relationships between chain length distribution of amylopectin and gelatinization properties within the same botanical origin for sweet potato and buckwheat. Carbohydrate Polymers 37 : 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00047-2
  11. Olkku, J and C. Rha. 1978. Gelatinization of starch and wheat flour starch - A review. Food Chem. 3 : 293-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(78)90037-7
  12. Parades-Lopez, O. 1994. Amaranth carbohydrate, in amaranth biology, chemistry and technology, O Parades-Lopez, ed, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
  13. Ratnayake, W. S., R. Hoover, F. Shahidi, C. Perera and J. Jane. 2001. Composition, molecular structure, and physicochemical properties of starches from four field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Food Chem. 74(2) : 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00124-8
  14. Sandhya Rani, M. R and K. R. Bhattacharya. 1989. Rheology of rice flour pastes: Effect of variety, concentration, and temperature and time of cooking. J. Texture Stud. 20 : 127-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1989.tb00427.x
  15. Schoch, T. J and E. C. Maywald. 1968. Preparation and properties of various legume starches. Cereal Chem. 45 : 564-573.
  16. Svegmark, K., A. M. Hermansson. 1993. Microstructure and rheological properties of composites of potato starches granules and amylose. a comparison of observed and predicted structure. Food Struct. 12 : 181-193.
  17. Tester, R. F and W. R. Morrison. 1990. Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches. I. Effect of amylopectin, amylose and lipids. Cereal Chemistry 67 : 551-557.
  18. Wang, L., Y. J. Wang. 2001. Comparison of protease digestion at neutral pH with alkaline steeping method for rice starch isolation. Cereal Chem. 78 : 690-692. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2001.78.6.690

Cited by

  1. Influence of Different Transplanting Dates on Amylopectin Branch-chain-length and Pasting Properties of Rice Flour Varieties vol.63, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2018.63.3.210
  2. Millet starch: A review vol.180, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.063