DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A 5-year retrospective clinical study of the Dentium implants

  • Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Hyo-Jin (Advanced Prosthodontics, Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Eun (Advanced Prosthodontics, Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Geun (Advanced Prosthodontics, Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soo (Advanced Prosthodontics, Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Advanced Prosthodontics, Postgraduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center)
  • Received : 2011.11.09
  • Accepted : 2011.12.08
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate cumulative survival rate (CSR) of Implantium implants followed for 5 years and association between risk factors and the CSR. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of two hundred forty-nine Implantium Implants System (Dentium, Seoul, Korea) placed in ninety-five patients from 2004 to 2009 were investigated with several identified risk factors (sex, systemic disease, smoking, alchohol, reason of tooth loss, length, arch (maxilla or mandible), replace tooth type (incisor, canine, premolar or molar) Kennedy classification, prosthodontic type, prosthodontic design, opposite dentition, abutment type, occlusal material, occlusal unit, splint to tooth, cantilever, other surgery). Clinical examination (mobility, percussion, screw loosening, discomfort, etc.) and radiographic examination data were collected from patient records including all problems during follow-up period according to protocols described earlier. Life table analysis was undertaken to examine the CSR. Cox regression method was conducted to assess the association between potential risk factors and overall CSR. RESULTS. Five of 249 implants were failed. Four of these were lost before loading. The 5-year implant cumulative survival rate was 97.37%. Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant predictive association between overall CSR and systemic disease, smoking, reason of tooth loss, arch, Kennedy classification and prosthodontic design (P<.05). The screw related complication was rare. Two abutment screw fractures were found. Another complications of prosthetic components were porcelain fracture, resin facing fracture and denture fracture (n=19). CONCLUSION. The 5-year CSR of Implantium implants was 97.37 %. Implant survival may be dependent upon systemic disease, smoking reason of tooth loss, arch, Kennedy classification and prosthodontic design (P<.05). The presence of systemic diseases and combination of other surgical procedures may be associated with increased implant failure.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  2. Fugazzotto PA, Gulbransen HJ, Wheeler SL, Lindsay JA. The use of IMZ osseointegrated implants in partially and completely edentulous patients: success and failure rates of 2,023 implant cylinders up to 60+ months in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:617-21.
  3. Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, Laird WR, Quayle AA. Experience with ITI osseointegrated implants at five centres in the UK. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:377-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90204-V
  4. Leimola-Virtanen R, Peltola J, Oksala E, Helenius H, Happonen RP. ITI titanium plasma-sprayed screw implants in the treatment of edentulous mandibles: a follow-up study of 39 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:373-8.
  5. Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:179-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2000.tb00012.x
  6. Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:567-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00715.x
  7. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00016.x
  8. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Linder E, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:381-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x
  9. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-64. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-6-.x
  10. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  11. Esposito M, Thomsen P, Ericson LE, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Histopathologic observations on late oral implant failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:18-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00103.x
  12. Smith RA, Berger R, Dodson TB. Risk factors associated with dental implants in healthy and medically compromised patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:367-72.
  13. Matukas VJ. Medical risks associated with dental implants. Int J Oral Implantol 1988;5:49-50.
  14. Kim SH, Kim S, Lee KW, Han DH. The effects of local factors on the survival of dental implants: A 19 year retrospective study. J Korean Acad Prothodont 2010;48:28-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.28
  15. Ko SM, Lee JK, Eckert SE, Choi YG. Retrospective multicenter cohort study of the clinical performance of 2-stage implants in South Korean populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:785-8.
  16. Doh RM, Moon HS, Shin JS, Lee KW. Retrospective study of the implantium(R) implant with a SLA surface and internal connection with microthreads. J Korean Acad of Prothodont 2009;47:136-47. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.136
  17. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  18. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:95-105.
  19. Roos J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Grondahl K, Albrektsson T. A qualitative and quantitative method for evaluating implant success: a 5-year retrospective analysis of the Branemark implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:504-14.
  20. Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, Sennerby L, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P, Hammerle CH. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:47-56.
  21. Rasmusson L, Roos J, Bystedt H. A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:36-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00045.x
  22. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:569-77.
  23. Fiorellini JP, Nevins ML, Sekler J, Chung A, Oringer RJ. Correlation of peri-implant health and aspartate aminotransferase levels: a cross-sectional clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:500-4.
  24. Stanford C. Dental implant outcomes may vary in patients with a history of periodontal disease. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010;10:46-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.016
  25. Schou S, Holmstrup P, Worthington HV, Esposito M. Outcome of implant therapy in patients with previous tooth loss due to periodontitis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:104-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01347.x
  26. Ong CT, Ivanovski S, Needleman IG, Retzepi M, Moles DR, Tonetti MS, Donos N. Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:438-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01207.x
  27. Bass SL, Triplett RG. The effects of preoperative resorption and jaw anatomy on implant success. A report of 303 cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:193-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020406.x
  28. Tolstunov L. Implant zones of the jaws: implant location and related success rate. J Oral Implantol 2007;33:211-20. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[211:IZOTJI]2.0.CO;2
  29. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11.
  30. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:303-11.
  31. Shin SW, Bryant SR, Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:52-8.
  32. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-16.
  33. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:352-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.91

Cited by

  1. Implants failures related to endodontic treatment. An observational retrospective study vol.26, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12415
  2. A systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis patients vol.27, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12684
  3. A 5-year prospective clinical study of Neobiotech implants for partially edentulous patients vol.55, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.3.272
  4. Cumulative survival rate and associated risk factors of Implantium implants: A 10-year retrospective clinical study vol.9, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.195
  5. Implant supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in partially edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part I. vol.29, pp.09057161, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13311
  6. Implant-supported cantilevered fixed dental rehabilitations in fully edentulous patients: Systematic review of the literature. Part II vol.29, pp.09057161, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13310
  7. Three-year Prospective Evaluation of Immediately Loaded Mandibular Implant Overdentures retained with Locator Attachments vol.18, pp.9, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2137
  8. Parametric Optimization of Dental Implants vol.22, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.2478/mme-2018-0084
  9. Evaluation of the Peri-Implant Bone Level around Platform-Switched Dental Implants: A Retrospective 3-Year Radiographic Study vol.16, pp.14, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142570