DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

연구를 위한 건강보험 청구자료 요구 및 이용 요인분석

Assessment of Needs and Accessibility Towards Health Insurance Claims Data

  • 이정아 (서울대학교 의학연구원 의료관리학연구소) ;
  • 오주환 (서울대학교 의학연구원 의료관리학연구소) ;
  • 문상준 (서울대학교 의학연구원 의료관리학연구소) ;
  • 임준태 (서울대학교 의과대학 의료관리학교실) ;
  • 이진석 (서울대학교 의학연구원 의료관리학연구소) ;
  • 이진용 (건양대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김윤 (서울대학교 의학연구원 의료관리학연구소)
  • Lee, Jung-A (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Ju-Hwan (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University) ;
  • Moon, Sang-Jun (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Jun-Tae (Department of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Seok (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Yong (Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Kim, Yoon (Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.11.28
  • 심사 : 2011.03.29
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31

초록

Objectives : This study examined the health policy researchers' needs and their accessibility towards health insurance claim datasets according to their academic capacity. Methods : An online questionnaire to capture relevant proxy variables for academic needs, accessibility, and research capacity was constructed based on previous studies. The survey was delivered to active health policy researchers through three major scholarly associations in South Korea. Seven-hundred and one scholars responded while the survey as open for 12 days (starting on December 20th, 2010). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were carried out. Results : Regardless of the definition for operational needs, the prevalent needs of survey respondents were not met with the current provision of claim data. Greater research capacity was shown to be correlated with increased demand for claim data along with a positive correlation between attempts to obtain claim datasets and research capacity. A greater research capacity, however, was not necessarily correlated with better accessibility to the claim data. Conclusions : The substantial unmet need for claim data among the healthcare policy research community calls for establishing proactive institutions which could systematically prepare and make available public datasets and provide call-in services to facilitate proper handling of data.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립암센터. 암 진료의 질 평가와 형평성 및 보장성 평가체계 개발 연구. 2010.
  2. 김재용. 근거기반 보건의료의 활성화를 위한 건강보험자료 활용: 현황과 과제. 대한예방의학회 동계 심포지움: 대한예방의학회; 2007. p. 1-28.
  3. 대한예방의학회. 진료정보의 적정활용 방안에 대한 연구; 2008.
  4. Bethell C, Fiorillo J, Lansky D, Hendryx M, Knickman J. Online consumer surveys as a methodology for assessing the quality of the United States health care system. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2004;6(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.1.e2
  5. Conway P, VanLare J. Improving Access to Health Care Data. JAMA 2010;304(9):1007-1008. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1249
  6. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project(HCUP). Data Use Agreement Training. Available at: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/tech_assist/dua.jsp (accessed at January 11, 2011)
  7. Iezzoni L. Using Administrative Data to Study Persons with Disabilities. Milbank Quarterly 2002;80(2):347-379. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00007
  8. Kaplowitz M, Hadlock T, Levine R. A comparison of web and mail survey response rates. Public opinion quarterly 2004;68(1):94-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh006
  9. O'NEIL K, Penrod S. Methodological variables in Web-based research that may affect results: Sample type, monetary incentives, and personal information. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2001;33(2):226-33.
  10. Pandiani J, Banks S. Large data sets are powerful. Psychiatric Services 2003;54(5):745-746. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.54.5.745
  11. Paolo A, Bonaminio G, Gibson C, Partridge T, Kallail K. Response rate comparisons of e-mail-and mail-distributed student evaluations. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2000;12(2):81-84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328015TLM1202_4
  12. Parks K, Pardi A, Bradizza C. Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: A comparison of telephone and Web-based survey methods. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2006;67(2):318-323. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2006.67.318
  13. Rantz M, Connolly R. Measuring nursing care quality and using large data sets in nonacute care settings: State of the science. Nursing Outlook 2004;52(1):23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.11.002
  14. Roos L, Menec V, Currie R. Policy analysis in an information-rich environment. Social Science & Medicine 2004;58(11):2231-2241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.008
  15. Roster C, Rogers R, Albaum G, Klein D. A comparison of response characteristics from web and telephone surveys. International Journal of Market Research 2004;46:359-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530404600301
  16. Sheehan K, McMillan S. Response variation in e-mail surveys: An exploration. Journal of Advertising Research 1999;39(4):45-54.
  17. Steiner C, Elixhauser A, Schnaier J. The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview. Effective clinical practice 2002;5(3):143-151.
  18. Weible R, Wallace J. The impact of the Internet on data collection. Marketing Research 1998;10(3):19-23.
  19. Zhan C, Miller M. Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review. British Medical Journal 2003;12(Suppl 2).

피인용 문헌

  1. Impact of Price Control on Drug Expenditure and Factors Associated with the Drug Switch among Statins: Analysis of HIRA-NPS Data vol.23, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2013.23.2.112