A readjustment procedure in the multivariate integrated process control

다변량 통합공정관리에서 재수정 절차

  • Cho, Gyo-Young (Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Suk (Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2011.10.18
  • Accepted : 2011.11.10
  • Published : 2011.12.01

Abstract

This paper considers the multivariate integrated process control procedure for detecting special causes in a multivariate IMA(1, 1) process. When the multivariate control chart signals, the special cause will be detected and eliminated from the process. However, when the elimination of the special cause costs high or is not practically possible, an alternative action is to readjust the process with approximately modified adjustment scheme. In this paper, we propose the readjustment procedure after having a true signal, and show that the use of the readjustment can reduce the deviation of a process from the target.

다변량 통합공정관리의 기본절차는 잡음이 내재하는 공정에 수정조치를 취하여 공정편차를 백색 잡음으로 전환하도록 하여 공정제곱편차를 최소화하게 되는 것이며, 이러한 다변량 통합공정관리의 수정활동을 하는 경우 공정에 이상원인이 발생하면 관리도를 통해 이를 탐지하고 제거하게 된다. 수정된 공정은 이상원인 발생 전에는 백색잡음이지만, 이상원인 발생 후 다양한 형태의 시계열 모형으로 변환하게 된다. 만약 수정된 공정을 탐지하여 이상원인의 신호가 발생한 경우 교정활동을 통하여 이를 제거해야 하지만, 구조적으로 교정이 불가능 하거나 교정활동의 비용이 많이 발생하는 경우에는이상원인의 효과를 감안하여 수정활동을 재조정해야할 것이다. 이 논문에서는 공정모형으로 다변량 IMA(1,1)모형을 가정하고 다변량 통합공정관리 절차를 수행하는 경우 이상신호가 발생한 후 재수정 절차를 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박창순, 권성구 (2009). 편차제곱평균과 수정량분산의 균형을 위한 단일 및 이중 지수가중이동평균 피드백 수정기의 수정. <한국데이터정보과학회지>, 20, 11-24.
  2. 박창순, 이재헌 (2008). 미래손실에 기초한 통합공정관리계획. <응용통계연구>, 21, 247-264.
  3. 박창순, 이재헌 (2009). 통합공정관리에서 재수정 절차. <한국통계학회논문집>, 16, 429-436.
  4. Box, G. E. P. and Kramer, T. (1992). Statistical process control and feedback adjustment adjustment - A discussion. Technometrics, 34, 251-285. https://doi.org/10.2307/1270028
  5. Del Castillo, E. (2002). Statistical process adjustment for quality control, John Wiley and Sons, New york, NY.
  6. Jiang, W. (2004). A joint monitoring scheme for automatically controlled processes. IIE transactions, 36, 1201-1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170490507828
  7. Lee, H. Y. and Lee, J. H. (2009). Change point estimators in monitoring the parameters of an IMA(1, 1) model. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 20, 435-443.
  8. Lee, J. H and Lee, H. Y. (2007). Change point estimators in monitoring the parameters of an AR(1) plus an additional random error model, Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 18, 963-972.
  9. Montgomery, D. C. (1999). A perspective on models and the quality sciences: Some challenges and future directions. ASQ Statistics Division Newsletter, 18, 8-13.
  10. Nembhard, H. B. and Chen, S. (2007). Cuscore control charts for generalized feedback-control system. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23, 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.831
  11. Pan, R. and Del Castillo, E. (2003). Integration of sequential process adjustment and process monitoring techniques. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 19, 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.590
  12. Park, C. (2007). An algorithm for the properties of the integrated process control with bounded adjustments and EWMA monitoring. International Journal of Production Research, 45, 5571-5587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701325397
  13. Park, C. and Lee, J. (2008). An integrated process control scheme based on the future loss. The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics, 21, 247-264. https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2008.21.2.247
  14. Park, C. and Reynolds, M. Jr. (2008). Economic design of an integrated process control procedure with repeated adjustments and EWMA monitoring. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 37, 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2007.10.005
  15. Runger, G., Testik, M. C. and Tsung, F. (2006). Relationships among control charts used with feedback control. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22, 877-887. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.774
  16. Vander Wiel, S. A. (1996). Monitoring processes that wander using integrated moving average models. Technometrics, 38, 139-151.