Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회논문집)

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on Material Constitutive Models of Ice

얼음의 재료 모델 적용 타당성 연구

  • Choung, Joon-Mo (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Nam, Ji-Myung (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Su (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 남지명 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 김경수 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.19
  • Accepted : 2010.10.14
  • Published : 2011.02.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To define ice as a solid material, mathematical and physical characteristics and their application examples are investigated for several materials' yield functions which include isotropic elastic, isotropic elastic-plastic, classical Drucker-Prager, Drucker-Prager Cap, Heinonen's elliptic, Derradji-Aouat's elliptic, and crushable foam models. Taking into account brittle failure mode of ice subject to high loading rate or extremely low temperature, isotropic elastic model can be better practicable than isotropic elastic-plastic model. If a failure criterion can be properly determined, the elastic model will provide relatively practicable impact force history from ice-hull interactions. On the other hand, it is thought that the soil models can better predict the ice spalling mechanism, since they contain both terms of shear stress-induced and hydrostatic stress-induced failures in the yield function.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, K. & Jeong, S.Y., 2008. Ice Load Prediction Formulas for Icebreaking Cargo Vessels. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 45(2), pp.175-185. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2008.45.2.175
  2. Choi, K. Jeong, S.Y. & Nam, J.H., 2009. Prediction of Design Ice Load on Icebreaking Vessels under Normal Operating Conditions. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46(6), pp.603-610. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2009.46.6.603
  3. Choung, J., 2009. Comparative Studies of Fracture Models for Marine Structural Steels. Ocean Engineering, 36, pp.1164–1174.
  4. Choung, J. Cho, S.R. & Kim, K.S., 2010. Impact Test Simulations of Stiffened Plates Using the Micromechanical Porous Plasticity Model. Ocean Engineering, 37, pp.749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.02.015
  5. Derradji-Aouat, A., 2003. Multi-Surface Failure Criterion for Saline Ice in the Brittle Regime. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 36, pp.47– 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00093-9
  6. Gagnon, R.E. & Derradji-Aouat, A., 2006. First Results of Numerical Simulations of Bergy Bit Collisions with the CCGS Terry Fox Icebreaker. Proc. of the 18th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, 28 Aug.–1 Sep. 2006, Sapporo Japan, pp.09-16.
  7. Gagnon, R.E. & Gammon, P.H., 1995. Triaxial Experiments on Iceberg and Glaciers Ice. Journal of Glaciology, 41(139), pp.528– 540. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000034869
  8. Heinonen, J., 2004. Constitutive Modeling of Ice Rubble in First-Year Ridge Keel. Ph.D. Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
  9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2007. ISO/DIS 19906: Arctic Offshore Structures Standard. ISO.
  10. Jensen, A. et al., 2001. Physical Modelling of First-Year Ice Ridges - Part II: Mechanical Properties. Proc. of 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC), 12-17 Aug. 2001, Ottawa Canada, pp.1493-1502.
  11. Jones, S.J., 1982. The Confined Compressive Strength of Polycrystalline Ice. Journal of Glaciology, 28(98), pp.171–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000011874
  12. Jones, S.J., 2007. A Review of the Strength of Iceberg and Other Freshwater Ice and the Effect of Temperature. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 47, pp.256–262.
  13. Karr, D.G. & Choi, K., 1989. A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Damage Model for Polycrystalline Ice. Mechanics of Materials, 8, pp.55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(89)90005-7
  14. Kermani, M., Farzaneh, M. & Gagnon, R., 2007. Compressive Strength of Atmospheric Ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 49, pp.195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.05.003
  15. Kim, H.S. & Lee, C.J., 2010. A Study on the Bow Shape of Ice Breaking Vessel. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(3), pp.469-475. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2010.47.3.469
  16. Kwak, M.J. Choi, J.H. Park, J.H. & Woo, J.H., 2009. Strength Assessment for Bow Structures of Arctic Tanker(107K) under Ship-Ice Interaction. International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology : Ice Class Vessels, 28-29 Sep. 2009, Busan Korea, pp.103-110.
  17. Lee. S.G. et al., 2009. Structural Safety Assessment in Membrane-Type CCS in LNGC under Iceberg Collisions. International Conference on Ship and Offshore Technology : Ice Class Vessels, 28-29 Sep. 2009, Busan Korea, pp.69-81.
  18. Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), 2009. LS-Dyna User Manual Version 971. LSTC.
  19. Rim, C.W. & Lee, T.K., 2007. Estimation of Ice Load on Bow of a Icebreaking Research Vessel. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 44(5). pp.509-516. https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2007.44.5.509
  20. Simulia, 2009. Abaqus User Manual Version 6.8. Simulia.
  21. Suh, Y. et al., 2008. Ice Collision Analyses for Membrane Tank Type LNG Carrier, Journal of Ship and Ocean Technology (SOTECH), 12(1), pp.35-44.
  22. Xiao, J. & Jordaan, I.J., 1996. Application of Damage Mechanics to Ice Failure in Compression. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 24, pp.305-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(95)00014-3
  23. Zou, B. Xiao, J. & Jordaan, I.J., 1996. Ice Fracture and Spalling in Ice-Structure Interaction. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 24, pp.213-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-232X(95)00009-Z