Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지

An AHP Approach to Evaluate the priorities of Manufacturing Performance Criteria in Korean Automobile Parts Manufacturing Company

AHP에 의한 한국자동차부품제조사의 제조성과기준의 중요도 평가

  • Received : 2011.08.18
  • Accepted : 2011.09.16
  • Published : 2011.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The critical role played by manufacturing performance measurement systems in achieving competitive success is increasingly recognized. Developing an integrated performance measurement model is significant for strategic management. This study consist of several principal steps. Performance criteria from the literature and an questionnaire were utilized prior to building the performance model. The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is utilized to evaluate the weight of each criterion when generating the performance measurement model for Korea automobile parts manufacturing company. AHP analysis showed clear difference in the priority between 5 criteria and 24 sub-criteria in terms of manufacturing performance of Korean automobile parts manufacturing company. The result of priority evaluation in the 5 criteria of 2nd level was ranked quality, cost, delivery, employee, flexibility. And the critical sub-criteria in the 24 sub-criteria of 3rd level was ranked claim rate, process defect rate, outsourcing parts defect rate, ability to quality management innovation, claim cost, etc.

Keywords

References

  1. 박진영; "의료서비스 산업의 성과측정에 관한연구", 생산성논집, 22(2) : 51-78, 2008.
  2. 오중산; "제조유연성과 성과간의 인과관계 : 자동차부품산업과 전자부품을 대상으로 한 연구", 경영학연구, 39(2) : 309-340, 2010.
  3. 조근태, 조용곤, 강현수; 계층분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2003.
  4. 조흥재, 박재일; "중소기업들의 생산성 문제 및 지표분류", 대한산업공학회/한국경영과학회 춘계공동학술대회, 2010.
  5. 한국자동차산업연구소; "2011년 자동차산업 주요 이슈", KARl Report(2011-1), 2011.
  6. Abdel-Maksoud, A. B.; "Manufacturing in the UK : Contemporary Characteristics and Performance Indicators," Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(2) : 155-171, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060410513742
  7. Ahmad. M. M. and Dhafr. N.; "Establishing and Improving Manufacturing Performance Measures", Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 18 : 171-176, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5845(02)00007-8
  8. Chenhall, R. H.; "Strategies of Manufacturing Flexibility, Manufacturing Performance Measures and Organizational Performance : An Empirical Investigation", Integrated Manu- facturing System, 7(5) : 25-32, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576069610129892
  9. EI Mola, Khaled M.; "Methodology to Measure the Performance of Manufacturing Systems," doctoral dissertation, Houston University, 2004.
  10. Ghalayini, A. M., Noble, J. S., and Crowe, T. J.; "An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measure-ment System", International Journal of production economics, 48 : 207-225, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(96)00093-X
  11. Leong, G. K., Snyder, D. L., and Ward, P. T.; "Research in the Process and Content of Manufacturing Strategy," OMEGA, 18(2) : 109-122, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(90)90058-H
  12. Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., and Chang, C.; "a Fuzzy AHP and BSC Approach for Evaluating Performance of IT Department in the Manufacturing Industry in Tiwan," Expert systems with Applications, 34(1) : 96-107, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
  13. Liu, S. T.; "Slack-Based Efficiency Measures for Predicting Bank Performance," Expert systems with applications, 36(2) : 2813-2818, 2008.
  14. Maskell, B. H.; Performance measurement for world class manufacturing. Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon, 1991.
  15. Saaty, R. W.; Decision Making in Complex Environments the Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York : McGraw-Hill, 2003.
  16. Skinner, W.; "Manufacturing-Missing Link in Corporate Strategy," Harvard Business Review, 47(May-June) : 130-145, 1969.
  17. Wang, W. K., Huang, H. C., and Lai, M. C.; "Design of a Knowledge Based Performance Evaluation System : a Case of High-tech State-owned Enterprises in an Emerging economy," Expert systems with Applications, 34(3) : 1795-1803, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.032
  18. White, G. P.; "A Survey and Taxonomy Strategy Related Performance Measures for Manufacturing," International Journal of Production and Production Management, 16(3) : 42-61, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610110486
  19. Yuan, F. C. and Chiu, C. C.; "A Hierarchical Design of Case-Based Reasoning in the Balanced Scorecard Application," Expert systems with Applications, 36(1) : 333-342, 2007.
  20. Yurdakul, M.; "Measuring a Manufacturing System's Performance Using Saaty's System with Feedback Approach," Integrated Manufacturing System, 13(1) : 25-34, 2007.