The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical evaluation of implant retained overdentures using two implant and Locator attachments in the fully edentulous mandibles

Locator attachment를 이용한 하악 임플란트 유지형 피개의치의 임상적 평가

  • Lee, Ju-Hyoung (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial, Department of Dentistry, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center) ;
  • Sohn, Dong-Seok (Division of Oral and Maxillofacial, Department of Dentistry, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center)
  • 이주형 (대구가톨릭대학교병원 치과) ;
  • 손동석 (대구가톨릭대학교병원 치과)
  • Received : 2011.07.21
  • Accepted : 2011.10.17
  • Published : 2011.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the marginal bone loss around dental implant that were placed in the canine areas of the mandibles and finded the survival rate of implants, marginal bone loss around implants and prosthetic complications in 10 patients treated with overdentures retained with Locator attachments. Materials and methods: Ten patients who had received implant retained overdentures in the mandibules using two implants and Locator attachments at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from 2004 to 2010 were included in this study. Evaluations of the survival rate of implants, marginal bone loss and prosthetic complications were performed. Results: Implants placed in this study showed a 100% survival rate and the average annual bone loss was 1.03 mm ${\pm}$ 0.20 mm in the first year. The patients have verbally indicated that they are comfortable and that their overdentures function well. But, implant retained overdentures had various prosthetic complications such as male change, relining, rebasing and denture fracture. Conclusion: Implant retained overdentures using two implant and Locator attachments in the fully edentulous mandibles is considered as a stable way for long terms because of minimal invasive operation, simple prosthetic process and easy repair.

연구 목적: 현대의학의 발달로 평균 수명이 증가하고 고령의 환자가 늘어남에 따라 무치악 환자의 비율도 증가하고 있다. 특히 심하게 흡수된 하악골에선 기존의 총의치로는 환자가 사용하기에 유지, 지지의 부족으로 사용상에 어려움이 있다. 하악에 2개의 임플란트 식립하여 피개의치를 제작하면 환자에게 좀 더 사용하기가 편한 의치를 제작해 줄 수 있다. 간단한 보철과정과 추후 수리가 쉽다는 이유로 현재 Locator가 보편적인 유지장치로 사용되고 있다. Locator를 이용한 하악 임플란트 유지 피개의치에서 임플란트와 보철물의 장기적인 성공률을 알아보았다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 대구가톨릭대학병원 치과 구강외과에서 2004년부터 2010년까지 총 10명의 환자(남 4명, 여 6명)의 하악에 2개의 임플란트(총 20개)를식립후Locator를 이용한 조직-유지 피개의치를 하였다. 본 연구는 최근 7년간 시술된 10명의 환자들을 대상으로 진료 기록부를 조사하고 방사선 사진을 계측하여 후향적 임상연구를 하였으며, 임플란트의 생존률 및 보철적인 합병증에 대해 알아보았다. 결과:임플란트는 100%의 누적 성공률을 보였고, 1년후(평균 58주) 방사선 사진에서 임플란트는 평균 1.03 mm ${\pm}$ 0.20 mm의 골소실을 보였으며, 임플란트의 기능에는 이상을 보이지 않았다. 피개의치는 의치파절, 의치상 이장 또는 개상, 메일의 탈락 또는 유지력 감소로 인한 메일 교체 등 다양한 합병증을 보였다. 그러나 의치상 이장 및 개상, 메일 인써트의 간단한 교체로 인해 장기적으로 임플란트 및 임플란트 유지 피개의치가 환자에게 유지되고 있었다. 결론: 하악 전방부위에 임플란트 2개를 식립 후 Locator를 이용한 임플란트 유지 하악 피개의치는 최소침습적인 수술, 간단한 보철 과정 및 수리 과정의 장점으로 인해 장기적으로 안정적인 치료법으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:108-25. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1108.x
  2. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x
  3. Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van't Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195-201. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003195.x
  4. Thomason JM. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10: 95-6.
  5. Mericske-Stern R, Steinlin ST, Marti P, Geering AH. Peri-implant mucosal aspects of ITI implants supporting overdentures. A fiveyear longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5: 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050102.x
  6. Kim SO. Implant Overdenture. Seoul: Myungmoon Publishing; 2007. pp. 115-8.
  7. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72.
  8. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Bra􀆆nemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  9. Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:91-100.
  10. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Calberson L, Demanet M. A prospective evaluation of the fate of 697 consecutive intraoral fixtures ad modem Br$\aa$nemark in the rehabilitation of edentulism. J Head Neck Pathol 1987;6:53-8.
  11. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Bra􀆆nemark PI, Jemt T. Longterm follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-59.
  12. Johns RB, Jemt T, Heath MR, Hutton JE, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson RM, Herrmann I. A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Br$\aa$nemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:513-22.
  13. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:170-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090304.x
  14. Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of overdenture restorations supported by osseointegrated titanium implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:375-83.
  15. Cooper LF, Scurria MS, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Moriarty JD, Felton DA. Treatment of edentulism using Astra Tech implants and ball abutments to retain mandibular overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:646-53.
  16. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  17. Kim YS. Implant adapted occlusion. J Korean Dent Assoc 2005;43:406-15.
  18. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Kalk W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:380-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80378-6
  19. Kim SO. Implant Overdenture. Seoul: Myungmoon Publishing; 2007. p. 311-22.

Cited by

  1. 임플란트 환자의 치료 만족도 및 구강건강관련 삶의 질(OHIP-14)에 관한 연구 vol.18, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20180047