DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bone regeneration of the fluoridated hydroxyapatite and the bio-glass in the rabbit cranium defect model

가토 두개골 결손 모델에서 Bioglass가 첨가된 불소화 수산화인회석의 골재생능력

  • Ahn, Hyo-Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Han, Se-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Wook (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 안효준 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 한세진 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김경욱 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.05.06
  • Accepted : 2011.09.29
  • Published : 2011.10.31

Abstract

Introduction: Hydroxyapatite ($Ca_{10}(PO_4)_6(OH)_2$, HA) is the main inorganic phase of human hard tissue that is used widely as the repair material for bones. When HA is applied to a bony defect, however, it can be encapsulated with fibrous tissue and float in the implanted area due to a lack of consolidation. Bioceramics as allogenic graft materials are added to HA to improve the rate and bone healing capacity. Fluoridated hydroxyapatite ($Ca_{10}(PO_4)_6(OH,F)_2$, FHA), where F- partially replaces the OH- in hydroxyapatite, is considered a good alternative material for bone repair owing to its solubility and biocompatibility. Materials and Methods: This study was designed to determine the bone healing capacity of FHA newly produced as a nanoscale fiber in the laboratory. HA and FHA with bioglass was implanted in a rabbit cranium defect and the specimen was analysed histologically. Results: 1. At 4 weeks, fibrous connective tissue and little bone formation was observed around the materials of the experimental group I implanted HA and bioglass. Newly formed bone was observed around the materials in the experimental group II implanted FHA and bioglass. 2. At 8 weeks, the amount of newly formed and matured bone was higher in experimental group II than in experimental group I and the control group. Conclusion: These results suggest that FHA and bioglass is a relatively favorable bone substitute with biocompatibility and better bone healing capacity than pure HA and bioglass.

Keywords

References

  1. Boyne PJ. Induction of bone repair by various bone grafting materials. In: Elliott K, Fitzsimons DW, Boyne PJ, eds. Hard Tissue Growth, Repair and Remineralization(Ciba Foundation Symposium 11). New York: Associated Scientific Publishers; 1973:121-5.29
  2. Costantino PD, Friedman CD. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:1037-42.
  3. Oreamuno S, Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Carranza FA Jr, Takei HH, Prokic B. Comparative clinical study of porous hydroxyapatite and decalcified freeze-dried bone in human periodontal defects. J Periodontol 1990;61:399-405. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.7.399
  4. Papay FA, Morales L Jr, Ahmed OF, Neth D, Reger S, Zins J. Comparison of ossification of demineralized bone, hydroxyapatite, Gelfoam, and bone wax in cranial defect repair. J Craniofac Surg 1996;7:347-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199609000-00006
  5. Driessens FC. Relation between apatite solubility and anti-cariogenic effect of fluoride. Nature 1973;243:420-1. https://doi.org/10.1038/243420a0
  6. Okazaki M, Miake Y, Tohda H, Yanagisawa T, Matsumoto T, Takahashi J. Functionally graded fluoridated apatites. Biomaterials 1999;20:1421-6.. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00049-6
  7. LeGeros RZ, Silverstone LM, Daculsi G, Kerebel LM. In vitro caries-like lesion formation in F-containing tooth enamel. J Dent Res 1983;62:138-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620021101
  8. Marie PJ, De Vernejoul MC, Lomri A. Stimulation of bone formation in osteoporosis patients treated with fluoride associated with increased DNA synthesis by osteoblastic cells in vitro. J Bone Miner Res 1992;7:103-13.
  9. Kim HW, Kim HE. Nanofiber generation of hydroxyapatite and fluor-hydroxyapatite bioceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;77:323-8.
  10. Katagiri T, Takahashi N. Regulatory mechanisms of osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Oral Dis 2002;8:147-59. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.01829.x
  11. Lynch SE, Genco RJ, Marx RE. Tissue Engineering. Applications in Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics. Chicargo: Quintessence Publishing Group; 1999.ion/msw
  12. Frost HM. Bone remodelling Dynamics. Springfield: Thomas CC 1963.
  13. Frost HM. Intermediary Organization of the Skeleton. BocaRaton: CRC Press 1986.
  14. Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turnern CH. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 2006;8:455-98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721
  15. Canalis E, Economides AN, Gazzerro E. Bone morphogenetic proteins, their antagonists, and the skeleton. Endocr Rev 2003:24:218-35. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0023
  16. Glowacki J, Mulliken JB. Induced osteogenesis for repair and construction in the craniofacial region. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;65:553-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198005000-00001
  17. Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Treatment of jaws defects with demineralized bone implants. J Oral Maxillfac Surg 1982;40:623-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(82)90109-4
  18. Einhorn TA, Lane JM, Burstein AH, Kopman CR, Vigorita VJ. The healing of segmental bone defects induced by demineralized bone matrix. A radiographic and biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984;66:274-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198466020-00015
  19. Fenter AE, Hartigan MS, Low SB. Periodontal repair using PerioGlas in nonhuman primates: clinical and histologic observations. Compendium 1994;15:932, 935-8.
  20. Kim HW, Lee EJ, Kim HE, Salih V. Effect of fluoridation of hydroxyapatite in hydroxyapatite-polycaprolactone composites on osteoblast activity. Biomaterials 2005;26:4395-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.008
  21. Rho KS, Han SJ, Kim CH, Kim KW. Bone healing capacity of the new fluoridated hydroxyapatite in the rabbit cranium defect. J Korean Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;33:464-9.