The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (전기학회논문지)

The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (대한전기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of a Load Serving Entity Revenue in the Real Time Pricing Considering Customer's Utility

소비자 효용을 고려한 실시간 요금제의 Load Serving Entity 수익 설계 방안

  • Received : 2010.08.31
  • Accepted : 2010.12.30
  • Published : 2011.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Real Time Pricing(RTP) is used not only to stabilize the price volatility in electricity market, but to hedge the price risk for Load Serving Entity(LSE). This paper presents an efficient method to reduce the risk of the price volatility in real-time electricity market. For designing the RTP, load patterns of customer are calculated by applying the demand elasticity and customer's utility is also analyzed to compute the RTP revenue through the risk-attribute of the LSE. In the end, the distribution of the LSE's profits can be evaluated to lead the optimal RTP value, depending on the level of customer's participation. Results from the case study based on PJM data are reported to illustrate the proposed method.

Keywords

References

  1. A. L. Ott, "Experience with PJM Market Operation, System Design, and Implementation", IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 18(2), pp.528-534, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.810698
  2. R. Walawalkar, S. Blumsack, J. Apt and S. Fernands, "Analyzing PJM's Economic Demand Response Program", IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting. 2008.
  3. N. K. Nomikos, and O. A. Soldatos, "Modelling short and long-term risks in power markets: Empirical evidence from Nord Pool", Energy Policy 38(10), pp.5671-5683, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.015
  4. S. Borenstein, "The Long-Run Effects of Real-Time Electricity Pricing", Energy Journal 26, pp.93-116, 2005.
  5. Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them: A Report to the United State Congress Pursuant to Section 1252 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, U.S. Department of Energy, Feb. 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.oe.energy.gov/DocumentsandMedia/congress_1252d.pdf.
  6. Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering: Staff Report, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Aug. 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/demand-response.pdf.
  7. F. C. Schweppe, M. C. Caramanis, R. D. Tabor, and R. E. Bohn, "Spot Pricing of Electricity", Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1988.
  8. Q. Zhang, and X. Wang, "Hedge Contract Characterization and Risk-Constrained Electricity Procurement", IEEE 24(3), pp.1547-1558, 2009.
  9. M. T. O'Sheasy, "Is Real-Time Pricing a Panacea? If So, Why Isn't It More Widespread?", The Electricity Journal, 15(10), pp.24-34, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(02)00397-4
  10. 박정식, 박종원, "현대투자론", 다산출판사, 2005.
  11. R. A. Haugen, "Modern investment theory", Prentice Hall, 2001.
  12. N. Hopper, C. Goldman, and B. Neenan, "Demand Response from Day-Ahead Hourly Pricing for Large Customers", The Electricity Journal 19(3), pp.52-63, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2006.02.002