ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Asymmetric Regulation of Mobile Access Charges and Consumer Welfare with Price Regulation

  • Received : 2009.08.20
  • Accepted : 2010.01.04
  • Published : 2010.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Asymmetric regulation as applied to mobile termination rates refers to regulatory arrangements in which different mobile operators charge different termination rates, even though the services provided are essentially identical. The asymmetric regulation has been frequently used as a regulatory tool to support new entrants to a mobile market. This paper examines the economic effects of asymmetric regulation of mobile termination rates using a theoretical model and its simulation. The result shows that when there is no noticeable difference in brand loyalty between mobile operators with the high degree of substitutability between services provided by mobile operators, and the costs of new entrants are low, a reduction in the asymmetry of mobile access prices results in an enhancement of consumer welfare. These findings provide positive evidence for the argument that in certain situations asymmetric pricing of mobile access services may be counterproductive for consumer welfare.

Keywords

References

  1. European Commission, "Draft Commission Recommendation on the Regulatory Treatment of Fixed and Mobile Termination Rates in the EU," 2008, p. 5.
  2. ERG, "ERG Report on the Consultation for the ERG Common Position on Symmetry of Fixed Call Termination Rates and Symmetry of Mobile Call Termination Rates," 2008, pp. 74-80.
  3. Ofcom, "Mobile Call Termination," Statement, 2007.
  4. European Commission, "Telecoms: Commissioner Reding Welcomes Commitment of Italy's Telecoms Regulator AGCOM to Further Reduce Mobile Termination Rates as an "Important Step in the Right Direction," MEMO/08/708, 2008.
  5. FCC, "Order on Remand and Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking," FCC 08-262, 2008.
  6. T. Valletti, "Asymmetric Regulation of Mobile Termination Rates," Working Paper, 2006.
  7. Cullen International, "Telecommunications Central and Eastern Europe: Cross-Country Analysis," 2008, p. 94.
  8. Ovum, "Historical Mobile Termination Charge: Quarterly Data," 2008.
  9. Merrill Lynch, "Global Wireless Matrix 4Q 07," 2008.
  10. M. Peitz, "On Access Pricing in Telecoms: Theory and European Practice," Telecommunication Policy, vol. 27, no. 10-11, 2003, pp. 729-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2003.06.001
  11. L. Cricelli et al., "Mobile Networks Competition and Asymmetric Regulation of Termination Charges," Telecommunications Modeling, Policy, And Technology, S. Raghavan, B. Golden, and E. Wasil, Ed. Springer, 2008, ch. 7, pp. 123-152.
  12. M. Armstrong, "Network Interconnection in Telecommunications," Economic J., vol. 108, 1998, pp. 545-564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00304
  13. J. Laffont, P. Rey, and J. Tirole, "Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing & Network Competition: II. Price Discrimination," RAND J. Economics, vol. 29, no. 1, 1998, pp. 1-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555814
  14. M. Carter and J. Wright, "Interconnection in Network Industries," Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 14, 1999, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007715215394
  15. M. Cherdron, "Interconnection, Termination-Based Price Discrimination, and Network Competition in a Mature Telecommunications Market," Mimeo, University of Mannheim, 2001.
  16. T.S. Gabrielsen and S. Vagstad, "Why is On-Net Traffic Cheaper Than Off-Net Traffic? Access Markup as a Collusive Device," European Economic Review, vol. 52, 2008, pp. 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.02.002
  17. C. Cambini and T.M. Valletti, "Network Competition with Price Discrimination: 'bll-and-keep' Is Not so Bad After All," Economic Lett., vol. 81, 2003, pp. 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00171-X
  18. W. Dessein, "Network Competition in Nonliear Pricing," RAND J. Economics, vol. 34, no. 4, 2003, pp. 593-611. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593778
  19. J.S. Gans and S.P. King, "Using 'Bill and Keep' Interconnect Arrangements to Soften Network Competition," Economics Lett., vol. 71, 2001, pp. 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00279-2
  20. J. Calzada and T.M. Valletti, "Network Competition and Entry Deterrence," The Economic J., vol. 118, 2008, pp. 1223-1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02167.x
  21. M. Armstrong, "The Theory of Access Pricing and Interconnection," Handbook of Telecommun. Economics, M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang, Ed. vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2002, pp. 337-346.
  22. R. Dewenter and J. Haucap, "The Effects of Regulating Mobile Termination Rates for Asymmetric Networks," European J. Law and Economics, vol. 20, 2005, pp. 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-005-1736-z
  23. S. Hoerning, "On-net and Off-net Pricing on Asymmetric Telecommunications Networks," Information Economics and Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, 2007, pp. 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.01.004
  24. J.S. Gans and S.P. King, "Mobile Network Competition, Customer Ignorance and Fixed-To-Mobile Call Prices," Information Economics and Policy, vol. 12, 2000, pp. 310-327.
  25. J. Wright, "Access Pricing under Competition: An Application to Cellular Networks," The J. Ind. Economics, vol. 30, no. 3, 2002, pp. 289-315.
  26. P. De Bijl and M. Peitz, Regulation and Entry into Telecommunications Markets, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  27. M. Peitz, "Asymmetric Regulation of Access and Price Discrimination in Telecommunications," J. Regulatory Economics, vol. 28, no. 3, 2005, pp. 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-3963-1
  28. M. Peitz, "Asymmetric Access Price Regulation in Telecommunications Markets," European Economic Reviews, vol. 49, 2005, pp. 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00046-1
  29. V. Kocsis, "Network Asymmetries and Access Pricing in Cellular Telecommunications," Budapest University of Economic Sciences and Public Administration, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005.
  30. P. Geoffron and H. Wang, "What Mobile Termination Regime for Asymmetric Firms with a Calling Club Effect?" Working paper, 2008.
  31. S.Y. Kim and M.C. Park, "An Analysis of Asymmetric Access Charge in Asymmetric Mobile Telecommunication Market," A Collection of Essays on Competition and Regulation with Asymmetries in Mobile Markets, L. Benzoni and P. Geoffron, Ed. Quantifica Publishing, 2007, pp. 96-111.
  32. S. Littlechild, "Price Controls on Mobile Termination Charges," The Vodafone Policy Paper Series, 2003.
  33. M. Armstrong, "Network Interconnection with Asymmetric Networks and Heterogeneous Calling Patterns," Information Economics and Policy, vol. 16, 2004, pp. 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2004.01.006
  34. M. Carter and J. Wright, "Asymmetric Network Interconnection," Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 22, 2003, pp. 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022199902266
  35. J.D. Song, "Bertrand Equilibrium with Differentiated Products Considering Fixed Costs: Korean Price Regulation in the Mobile Telephone Industry," Telecommun. Policy, vol. 33, 2009, pp. 676-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.003
  36. C.H. Park, S.S Han, W.H. Seok, "Mobile Telecommunications Market Regulations and Carrier Performance: The Korean Case," ETRI J., vol. 32, no. 1, 2010, pp. 129-138. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.10.0109.0179
  37. European Commission, "Progress Report on the Single European Electronic Communications Market 2007," 13th Report on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package, vol. 2, 2008, p. 30.

Cited by

  1. Determination of Asymmetric Wholesale Access Prices: Case of Turkish Mobile Communications Market vol.5, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3923/ibm.2011.19.26
  2. Analyzing the Economic Effect of Mobile Network Sharing in Korea vol.34, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.12.0111.0471
  3. The Online Transportation Network in Indonesia: A Pendulum between the Sharing Economy and Ex Ante Regulation vol.17, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1177/178359171601700304
  4. Asymmetric Networks and Access Charges vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793993319500054