GC에서 검출한계 결정을 위한 새로운 접근 방법에 대한 연구

Study on the new approaching method to determine limit of detection by gas chromatography

  • Oh, Doe-Suk (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Shin, Kyoung-Ae (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Ji-A (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Lym, Jong-Ho (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Shin, Mi-Sun (Environmental Analysis and Consulting Co. Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2010.08.09
  • 심사 : 2010.10.13
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31

초록

The purity methods to determine LOD/LOQ using standard deviation of the residual, intercept and blank by IUPAC and ACS describe many of the pitfalls and pose significant challenges to analytical chemists. Therefore, the aim of this study is the development of the simple, easy, convenient and statistically significant method to determine LOD in quantitative analysis of organic solvents by GC. The new approaching method by linearization in the given concentration range used coefficient of variation ; ${\sigma}_{n-1}$/S(standard deviation, ${\sigma}_{n-1}$ and average, S) of sensitivity(Response/concentration). The comparison of results among the purity methods(IUPAC and ACS) and the linearization have been fulfilled the F-test for standard deviations and t-test for LOD range values. The results of F-test and t-test are satisfied within 95 % confidence level, respectably. The LOD values determined by the new procedure are n-Hexane 0.0116 mg/$m^3$, Toluene 0.0807 mg/$m^3$, and o-Xylene 0.0494 mg/$m^3$. Because the standard deviation of the residual, intercept and blank and the slope of calibration curve are not calculated and the new approaching method use the coefficient of variation of sensitivity by linearization, this new method is simple, easy, convenient and statistically significant. In future, many chemical analysts will expect to applicate and routinely use this method in the all quantitative analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 오도석. 콘센트레이티드 크로마토그라피, 지산; 2002(47-56쪽).
  2. 김하석,이후성,채명준. 분석화학. 동화기술; 1988.
  3. MacDoughal D. Guidelines for data acquisition and data quality evaluation in environmental chemistry. Anal Chem 1980;52:2242. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50064a004
  4. Lawrence H. Principles of environmental analysis. Anal Chem 1983;55:2217.
  5. Poole CP, Schuette SA. Contemporary practice of chromatography. Elsevier 1984;385-389.
  6. Apostol I, Miller K, Ratto J, Kelner D. Comparison of different approaches for evaluation of the detection and quantitation limits of a quantity method: A case study using a capillary isoelectrofocusing method for a monoclonal antibody Analytical Biochemistry 2009;385:101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.09.053
  7. Sevcik J, Lips JE. Meaning of GC detector characteristics chromatography. 1979;12(10):69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302949
  8. Mocak J, Bond AM, Mitchell S, Scollary G. A Statistical overview of standard (iupac and acs) and new procedures for determining the limits of detection and quantification: application to voltametric and stripping techniques. Pure & Appl Chem 1997;69(2):298.
  9. Jardy VA. Experimental comparison of the different approaches to estimate LOD and LOQ of an HPLC method. Anal Chem 1999;71:2677-2772.
  10. William RP. Proper statistical evaluation of calibration data. Anal Chem 1983;55(13):1290. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00263a717