Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-slice Dual-source Computed Tomography in the Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis based on Patient Heart Rate and Calcium Scores

관상동맥 질환의 진단에서 심박수와 석회화 정도에 따른 Dual-source CT의 진단적 정확성

  • Kim, Eun-Young (Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Jin, Gong-Yong (Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Han, Young-Min (Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Kwak, Hyo-Sung (Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Chae, Jei-Keon (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Rok (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Keun-Sang (Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine)
  • 김은영 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 영상의학교실) ;
  • 진공용 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 영상의학교실) ;
  • 한영민 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 영상의학교실) ;
  • 곽효성 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 영상의학교실) ;
  • 채제건 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 이상록 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 권근상 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2010.03.05
  • Accepted : 2010.06.28
  • Published : 2010.09.01

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in the detection of coronary artery stenosis (CAS) based on patient heart rate and calcium scores. Materials and Methods: This study included 102 patients (46 male, 56 female; mean age $64.1{\pm}10.6$ years; age range 37-92 years) with chest pain and who underwent DSCT as well as invasive coronary angiography. Patients were classified into three groups according to mean heart rate (<70 bpm, 70-90 bpm, and >90 bpm) and also classified in three groups according to Agatston calcium scores (<100, 100-400, and >400). Results: For patients with a mean heart rate < 70 bpm, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of DSCT on a per-vessel basis were 98.5%, 98.2%, 93.6%, 99.1%, and 97.9%, respectively, 99.2%, 99.2%, 97.4%, 99.5%, and 99%, respectively, for 70-90 bpm; and 91.7%, 97.9%, 88.5%, 96.7%, and 95.7%, respectively, for >90 bpm. For calcium scores <100, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of DSCT on a per-vessel basis were 97.2%, 99.0%, 97.0%, 99.3%, and 98.6%, respectively, 98.5%, 99.5%, 96.2%, 99.4%, and 99.0%, respectively, for calcium scores 100-400, and 95.8%, 97.0%, 87.4%, 97.2%, and 95.6%, respectively, for calcium scores >400. Conclusion: DSCT showed a high diagnostic accuracy and negative predictive value, regardless of heart rate and calcium score.

목적: 관상동맥 질환의 진단에서 심박수와 석회화 정도에 따른 64 절편 이중선원CT(dual-source CT, 이하 DSCT)의 진단 정확도를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 관상동맥 질환이 의심되는 환자 중에서 DSCT와 침습적 관상동맥조영술을 모두 시행한 102명(남자 46명, 여자 56명; 평균 연령, $64.1{\pm}10.6$; 연령 범위, 37-92)의 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 환자들은 평균 심박수에 따라 70 미만, 70-90, 90 이상의 세 그룹으로 구분되었고 Agatston 점수에 따라 100 미만, 100-400, 400 이상으로 구분되었다. 그리고 각 그룹에서 민감도, 특이도, 양성 예측도, 음성 예측도 그리고 정확도를 계산하였다. 결과: 혈관별 분석에서 DSCT의 민감도, 특이도, 양성 예측치, 음성 예측치, 정확도는 심박수가 70 미만인 환자들에서 98.5%, 98.2%, 93.6%, 99.1%, 97.9%, 심박수 70 이상 90 미만인 환자들에서 99.2%, 99.2%, 97.4%, 99.5%, 99%, 심박수 90 이상인 환자들에서 91.7%, 97.9%, 88.5%, 96.7%, 95.7%를 보였다. 또한, 석회화 점수가 100 미만인 환자들에서 97.2%, 99.0%, 97.0%, 99.3%, 98.6%, 100 이상 400 미만인 환자들에서 98.5%, 99.5%, 96.2%, 99.4%, 99.0%, 400 이상인 환자들에서 95.8%, 97.0%, 87.4%, 97.2%, 95.6%를 보였다. 결론: DSCT는 심박수와 석회화 정도와 상관없이 관상동맥 질환의 진단에 있어서 높은 진단적 정확도와 음성 예측도를 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bastarrika G, Lee YS, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf UJ, et al. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 2009;253:317-338 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2532081738
  2. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, Cramer MJ, Mollet NR, van Mieghem CA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:2135-2144 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.058
  3. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2007;28:3042-3050 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm466
  4. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Desbiolles L, Grunenfelder J, Marincek B, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1482-1487 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi261
  5. Pugliesen F, Mollet NR, Runza G, van Mieghem C, Meijboom WB, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006;16:575-582 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0041-0
  6. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:173-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.08.021
  7. Nikolaou K, Kenx A, Rist C, Wintersperger BJ, Leber A, Johnson T, et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:111-117 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1697
  8. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64 slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:552-557 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056
  9. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, Desbiolles L, Husmann L, Plass A, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006;241:378-385 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412051384
  10. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, Chan WL, Seyfarth MT, Liew HB, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcification. Am Heart J 2006;151:1323,E1-E6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.12.027
  11. Donnino R, Jacobs J, Doshi JV, Hecht EM, Kim DC, Babb JS, et al. Dual-source versus single-source cardiac CT angiography: comparison of diagnostic image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192: 1051-1056 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1198
  12. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, Leber AW, Becker A, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 2007;42:684-691 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31806907d0
  13. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vaschenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, et al. Accuracy of dual source CT coronary angiography: first experience in high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2739-2747 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0
  14. Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T, Anders K, Kuettner A, Stilianakis NI, et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual - source computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:2393-2398 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.017
  15. Leber AW, Johnson T, Becker A, von Ziegler F, Tittus J, Nikolaou K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2354-2360 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm294
  16. Rixe J, Rolf A, Conradi G, Moellmann H, Nef H, Neumann T, et al. Detection of relevant coronary artery disease using dual-source computed tomography in a high probability patient series. Circ J 2009;73:316-322 https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0534
  17. Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Stolzmann P, Plass A, et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 2008;29:766-776 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn044
  18. Brodoefel H, Burgstahler C, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Schroeder S, Claussen CD, et al. Dual-source CT: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcification on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 2008;247:346-355 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2472070906
  19. Brodoefel H, Tsiflikas I, Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Thomas C, Schroeder S, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography: effect of body mass index on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Invest Radiol 2008;43:712-718 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318180bae1
  20. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, Huber E, Zankl M, Martinoff S, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305-1310 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602490
  21. Morin RL. Monte carlo simulation in the radiological sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1988
  22. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the ad hoc committee for grading of coronary artery disease, council on cardiovascular surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975;51(4 Suppl):5-40 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5
  23. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation. Radiology 2007;245:703-711 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453070094
  24. Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A, Becker C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou K, et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:1241-1247 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.10.059
  25. Zhang S, Levin DC, Halpern EJ, Fischman D, Savage M, Walinsky P. Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaque. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:1676-1683 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.4026
  26. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, Ferencik M, Hoffmann U, MaeNeill B, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter Multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2004;109:14-17
  27. Burgstahler C, Reimann A, Drosch T, Heuschmid M, Brodoefel H, Tsiflikas I, et al. Cardiac dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe coronary calcifications and a high prevalence of coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2007;1:143-151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2007.09.003
  28. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Lemos PA, Saia F, Runza G, Midiri M, et al. Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy for the detection of significant coronary stenosis with multislice computed tomography angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:1225-1227 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.051
  29. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Leber AW, von Ziegler F, Rist C, et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1409-1415 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0298-y
  30. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Bruder H, et al. Contrast enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006;57:331-335 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.017