DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Epicardial Fat Volume With Threshold-Based 3-Dimensional Segmentation in CT: Comparison With the 2-Dimensional Short Axis-Based Method

  • Park, Mi-Jung (Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jung, Jung-Im (Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Oh, Yong-Seog (Department of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Youn, Ho-Joong (Department of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.23
  • 심사 : 2010.02.09
  • 발행 : 2010.07.30

초록

Background and Objectives: We aimed to assess the usefulness of a threshold-based, 3-dimensional (3D) segmentation in comparison with the traditional 2-dimensional (2D) short axis-based method for measurement of epicardial fat volume with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Subjects and Methods: One hundred patients (52 males; mean age, 58.36${\pm}$11.0 years) who underwent coronary CT angiography were enrolled in this study. The epicardial fat volume was measured using the two methods. The existing method was the 2D short axis-based method and the new method was the threshold-based 3D segmentation. Pearson's correlation was used to compare the two measurement methods. We also assessed the relationship between the epicardial fat volume and coronary artery disease (CAD). Results: There were a strong correlation between the epicardial fat volumes determined using the two methods (r=0.956, p<0.001). The mean overestimation of epicardial fat volume by the threshold-based 3D method was 59.89${\pm}$12.00% compared to the 2D short-axis based method. Using the 3D method, the epicardial fat volume was significantly higher in the CAD group than in the controls (165.07${\pm}$48.22 $m^3$ vs. 108.39${\pm}$48.03 $m^3$, p<0.001). Conclusion: Threshold-based 3D segmentation is another easy and useful tool for measuring the epicardial fat volume.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Taguchi R, Takasu J, Itani Y, et al. Pericardial fat accumulation in men as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2001; 157:203-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9150(00)00709-7
  2. Djaberi R, Schuijf JD, van Werkhoven JM, Nucifora G, Jukema JW, Bax JJ. Relation of epicardial adipose tissue to coronary atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:1602-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.010
  3. Gorter PM, de Vos AM, van der Graaf Y, et al. Relation of epicardial and pericoronary fat to coronary atherosclerosis and coronary artery calcium in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:380-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.002
  4. Jeong JW, Jeong MH, Yun KH, et al. Echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness and coronary artery disease. Circ J 2007;71:536-9. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.71.536
  5. Ahn SG, Lim HS, Joe DY, et al. Relationship of epicardial adipose tissue by echocardiography to coronary artery disease. Heart 2008;94:e7. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2007.118471
  6. Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008;117:605-13. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743062
  7. Galili O, Versari D, Sattler KJ, et al. Early experimental obesity is associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;292:H904-11. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00628.2006
  8. Fluchter S, Haghi D, Dinter D, et al. Volumetric assessment of epicardial adipose tissue with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Obesity 2007;15:870-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2007.591
  9. Dey D, Suzuki Y, Suzuki S, et al. Automated quantitation of pericardiac fat from noncontrast CT. Invest Radiol 2008;43:145-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31815a054a
  10. Gorter PM, van Lindert AS, de Vos AM, et al. Quantification of epicardial and peri-coronary fat using cardiac computed tomography: reproducibility and relation with obesity and metabolic syndrome in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2008;197: 896-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.08.016
  11. Wheeler GL, Shi R, Beck SR, et al. Pericardial and visceral adipose tissues measured volumetrically with computed tomography are highly associated in type 2 diabetic families. Invest Radiol 2005;40:97-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200502000-00007
  12. Sarin S, Wenger C, Marwaha A, et al. Clinical significance of epicardial fat measured using cardiac multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:767-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.04.058
  13. Wang TD, Lee WJ, Shih FY, et al. Relations of epicardial adipose tissue measured by multidetector computed tomography to components of the metabolic syndrome are region-specific and independent of anthropometric indexes and intraabdominal visceral fat. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:662-9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0834
  14. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Fischer B, Klamm R, Mildenberger P, Thelen M. Assessment of lung volumes using helical CT at inspiration and expiration: comparison with pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1091-5. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.171.4.9763003
  15. Magnusson M, Lenz R, Danielsson PE. Evaluation of methods for shaded surface display of CT volumes. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1991;15:247-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-6111(91)90083-8
  16. Juergens KU, Seifarth H, Range F, et al. Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:308-14. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2283
  17. Cho H, Shin G, Lee J. Visceral fat accumulation in coronary artery disease. Korean Circ J 1998;28:740-8. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.1998.28.5.740
  18. Seo J, Kim DS, Kwon HM, et al. Severity of coronary artery disease and visceral fat obesity. Korean Circ J 1998;28:1176-84. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.1998.28.7.1176
  19. Tepe G, Wendel HP, Khorchidi S, et al. Thrombogenicity of various endovascular stent types: an in vitro evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002;13:1029-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61868-5
  20. White CM, Sander S, Coleman CI, et al. Impact of epicardial anterior fat pad retention on postcardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation incidence: the AFIST-III Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.033

피인용 문헌

  1. The Relationship between Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Malnutrition, Inflammation, Atherosclerosis/Calcification Syndrome in ESRD Patients vol.6, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.00890111
  2. Epicardial Adipose Tissue and Coronary Artery Calcification in Diabetic and Nondiabetic End-Stage Renal Disease Patients vol.33, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022x.2011.599913
  3. Epicardial adipose tissue volume as a predictor for coronary artery disease in diabetic, impaired fasting glucose, and non-diabetic patients presenting with chest pain. vol.13, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes024
  4. Peri-Aortic Fat Tissue Thickness in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients vol.33, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2011.00165
  5. Perivascular adipose tissue in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease vol.230, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.037
  6. An Update on Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease vol.2014, pp.None, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/767424
  7. Automated Quantification of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Using CT Angiography: Evaluation of a Prototype Software vol.24, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3052-2
  8. Epicardial adipose tissue: relationship between measurement location and metabolic syndrome vol.30, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0308-5
  9. The correlation of epicardial adipose tissue on postmortem CT with coronary artery stenosis as determined by autopsy vol.11, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-015-9659-7
  10. Thoracic fat volume is independently associated with coronary vasomotion vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3160-0
  11. The Role of Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation vol.1, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.22468/cvia.2017.00038
  12. Segmentation of the Ventricle Membranes in Short‐Axis Sequences by Optical Flow Base on DLSRE Model vol.30, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1049/cje.2021.03.009
  13. Automatic quantification of epicardial adipose tissue volume vol.48, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15012