Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지

Forest Patch Characteristics and Their Contribution to Forest-Bird Diversity - Focus on Chungcheong Province Area -

산림패치의 특성이 조류 종 다양성에 미치는 영향분석 - 충청지역을 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Dong-Kun (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Chan (Graduate School of Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Kyu-Sik (Department of Urban Planning, Hanyang University)
  • 이동근 (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부) ;
  • 박찬 (서울대학교 대학원) ;
  • 오규식 (한양대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2010.09.20
  • Accepted : 2010.10.19
  • Published : 2010.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Urban development typically results in many species being confined to small, isolated and degraded habitat fragments. Fragment size and isolation underpin many studies of modified landscape to prevent biodiversity loss. However, habitat characteristics such as vegetation structure and edge effects are less frequently incorporated in planning. The relative influence of biogeographic (e.g. size, isolation) and vegetation parameters on assemblages is poorly understood, but critical for conservation management. In this study, the relative importance of biogeographic and vegetation parameters in explaining the diversity of forest-interior dwelling birds in forest fragments in Chungcheong Province Area. Fragment size and vegetation characteristics were consistently important predictors of bird diversity. Forestinterior bird richness was influenced by fragment size (0.437), wood age (0.332), wood diameter (0.068), and patch shape (-0.079). To preserve bird diversity of Chungcheong Province Area, it is important to consider differing responses of bird diversity to landscape change, move beyond a focus primarily on spatial attributes (size, isolation) to recognize that landscape change also has profound effects on habitat composition and quality. The result is very useful for long-term aspect of biodiversity conservation plan in regional scale.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경과학원. 2005. 생태․자연도 조사체계 개선방안.
  2. 김명수. 2001. 파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초 이론 고찰. 한국환경복원기술녹화학회지 4(2) : 52-61.
  3. 김영숙․박헌우․권미경․김수일. 2002. 산림환경구조에 따른 조류군집 비교 연구. 한국조류학회지 9(2) : 105-114.
  4. 서종철. 2005. 환경부 제3차 전국자연환경조사 지형경관분야 개편(안). 한국지형학회지 12(4) : 69-78.
  5. 이도원. 2001. 경관생태학 : 환경계획과 설계, 관리를 위한 공간생리. 서울대학교출판부.
  6. 이동근․김보미․송원경. 2009. 조류․포유류의 분포와 산림면적 토지피복과의 관련성. 농촌계획 15(2) : 19-26.
  7. 이동근․김은영․오규식. 2005. 패치크기, 연결성, 가장자리를 고려한 보전가치평가. 한국환경복원녹화학회지 8(5) : 56-67.
  8. 이우신․임신재. 1998. 도시화의 영향에 의한 조류 군집의 변화. 한국조류학회지 5(1) : 47-55.
  9. 임신재. 1997. 서식지 구조에 따른 번식기 조류군집과 소형 포유류 개체군의 변화에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
  10. 조기현. 1996. 광릉지역 낙엽수 자연림과 침엽수 조림지의 서식지 구조와 조류군집과의 관계. 서울대학교 농학석사학위논문.
  11. 허위행․임신재․이우신. 2003. 산림 지역의 조류 군집에 대한 도로의 영향. 한국환경생태학회지 17(1) : 1-8.
  12. 홍선기. 1999. 경관생태학적 관점에서의 생물다양성 보전. 한국생물다양성협의회보 9 : 3-14.
  13. 홍선기․강신규․강호정․노태호․이은주. 2005. 경관생태학 : 이론과 응용. 라이프사이언스 21-44. page.
  14. Ewers, R. M., and Didham, E. K. 2006. The Effect of Fragment Shape and Species Sensitivity to Habitat Edges on Animal Population Size. Conservation Biology Volume, 21(4):926-936.
  15. Ferrari, J. R., Lookingbill, T. R., and Neel, M. C. 2007. Two measures of landscape-graph connectivity : assessment across gradients in area and configuration. Landscape Ecol. 80 (10): 9121-9127.
  16. Forman, R. T. T. 2000. Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States, Conserv. Biol, 14(1)：31-35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99299.x
  17. Forman, R. T.T. 1995. Land mosaics : The ecology of landscape and regions, Cambridge.
  18. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.l
  19. Hobbs, R. J., and Yates, C. J. 2003. Impacts of ecosystem fragmentation on plant population : generalising the idiosyncratic. Australian Journal of Botany 51：471-488. In Lindenmayer, D.B., J. Fischer. 2006. Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change : An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis. Washington : ISLAND PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT03037
  20. Holland, H. J., and Bennett, A. F. 2009. Differing responses to landscape change：implications for small mammal assemblages in forest fragments, Biodivers Conserv, 18 : 2997-3016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9621-7
  21. Luther, D., Hilty, J., Weiss, J., Cornwall, C., Wipf, M., and Ballard, G. 2008. Assessing the impact of local habitat variables and landscape context on riparian birds in agricultural, urbanised, and native landscapes. Biodivers Conserv, 17 : 1923-1935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9332-5
  22. MacArthur, R. H., and MacArthur, J. W. 1961. On bird species diversity, Ecology, 42 : 594-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932254
  23. Marulli, J., Mallarach, J. M. 2005. A gis methodology for assessing ecological connectivity : application to the Barcelona metropolitan area. Landscpae and urban planning, 71 : 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(04)00079-9
  24. Marzluff, J. M., and Ewing, K. 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds : a general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology, 9 : 280-292. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2001.009003280.x
  25. Nascimbene, J., Marini, L., and Motta, R. 2009. Influence of tree age, tree size and crown structure on lichen communities in mature Alpine spruce forests, Biodiversity conservation, 18 : 1509-1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9537-7
  26. Vemer, J. M., Morrison, L. M., and Ralph, C. J. 1986. Wildlife 2000; Modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin press, Madison wisconsin.
  27. Schonewald-Cox, C. M. 1983. Guidelines to management : A beginning attempt. In Richard B. Primack. 1993. Essentials of conservation biology. Sunderland, Messachusetts : sinauer Associates, Inc.