Corrosion Science and Technology

The Corrosion Science Society of Korea (한국부식방식학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of DC Biases and Post-CMP Cleaning Solution Concentrations on the Cu Film Corrosion

  • Lee, Yong-K. (Graduate School of NID Fusion Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kang-Soo (Xerochem Inc.)
  • Received : 2009.10.15
  • Accepted : 2010.12.10
  • Published : 2010.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Copper(Cu) as an interconnecting metal layer can replace aluminum (Al) in IC fabrication since Cu has low electrical resistivity, showing high immunity to electromigration compared to Al. However, it is very difficult for copper to be patterned by the dry etching processes. The chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process has been introduced and widely used as the mainstream patterning technique for Cu in the fabrication of deep submicron integrated circuits in light of its capability to reduce surface roughness. But this process leaves a large amount of residues on the wafer surface, which must be removed by the post-CMP cleaning processes. Copper corrosion is one of the critical issues for the copper metallization process. Thus, in order to understand the copper corrosion problems in post-CMP cleaning solutions and study the effects of DC biases and post-CMP cleaning solution concentrations on the Cu film, a constant voltage was supplied at various concentrations, and then the output currents were measured and recorded with time. Most of the cases, the current was steadily decreased (i.e. resistance was increased by the oxidation). In the lowest concentration case only, the current was steadily increased with the scarce fluctuations. The higher the constant supplied DC voltage values, the higher the initial output current and the saturated current values. However the time to be taken for it to be saturated was almost the same for all the DC supplied voltage values. It was indicated that the oxide formation was not dependent on the supplied voltage values and 1 V was more than enough to form the oxide. With applied voltages lower than 3 V combined with any concentration, the perforation through the oxide film rarely took place due to the insufficient driving force (voltage) and the copper oxidation ceased. However, with the voltage higher than 3 V, the copper ions were started to diffuse out through the oxide film and thus made pores to be formed on the oxide surface, causing the current to increase and a part of the exposed copper film inside the pores gets back to be oxidized and the rest of it was remained without any further oxidation, causing the current back to decrease a little bit. With increasing the applied DC bias value, the shorter time to be taken for copper ions to be diffused out through the copper oxide film. From the discussions above, it could be concluded that the oxide film was formed and grown by the copper ion diffusion first and then the reaction with any oxidant in the post-CMP cleaning solution.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Rosenberg, D. C. Edelstein, C. K. Hu, and K. P. Rodbell, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 30, 229 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.229
  2. J. M. Steigerwald, S. P. Murarka, R. J. Gutmann, and D.J. Duquette, Mater. Chem. Phys., 41. 217 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0254-0584(95)01516-7
  3. P. B. Zantye, A. Kumar. and A. K. Sikder, Mater. Sci. Eng. R., 45, 89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.06.002
  4. L. Arnaud, G. Tartavel, T. Berger, D. Mariolle, Y. Gobil, and I. Touet, Microelectron. Rel., 40, 77 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(99)00209-7
  5. M. Kodera, Y. Nishioka, S. Shima, A. Fukunaga, and M. Tsujimura, J. Appl. Phys., 10, 677 (2008).
  6. A. Nishi, M. Sado, T. Miki, and Y. Fukui, Appl. Surf. Sci., 470, 203 (2003).
  7. L. Zhang, S. Raghavan, and M. Weling, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 17, 2248 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.590901
  8. F. Zhang, A. A. Busnaina, and G. Ahmadi, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146, 2665 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391989
  9. Y. K. Hong, D. H. Eom, S. H. Lee, T. G. Kim, J. G. Park, and A. A. Busnaina, J. Electrochem. Soc., 151, G756 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1802493
  10. D. Ng, S. Kundu, M. Kulkarni, and H. Liang, J. Electrochem. Soc., 155, H64 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2806173
  11. Tung Ming Pan, Tan Fu Lei, Fu Hsiang Ko, Tien Sheng Chao, Ming Chi Liaw, Ying Hao Lee, and Chih Peng Lu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 49, G336 (2002).
  12. D. Ernur, S. Kondo, D. Shamiryan, and K. Maex, Microelectron. Eng., 64, 117 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9317(02)00775-X