Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Effect of Surface Treatments of on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Composite after aging Conditions

시효처리 후의 컴포지트에 대한 레진 컴포지트의 미세 인장 결합강도에 표면처리가 미치는 효과

  • Yoo, Min-Jin (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Her, Mi-Ja (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Lyang (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Mi-Kyung (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 유민진 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 허미자 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 김희량 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 유미경 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학 교실)
  • Received : 2010.06.05
  • Accepted : 2010.09.25
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Enhancement of bond strength between new and old composite usually requires increasing the surface roughness to promote mechanical interlocking. This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on repair bond strength of resin composite after aging condition. Air abrasion with Al2O3, chairside silicacoating, and silanization provided higher resin-resin bond strength values compared to control group and HF group. Air abrasion is necessary to repair a resin restoration and additional application of silane seems to have good effects on bond strength.

이전에 존재하던 컴포지트와 새로운 컴포지트 사이의 결합강도의 강화는 미세 기계적 유지를 증진하기 위한 표면 거칠기의 증가가 필요하다. 이 연구는 시효처리 후의 레진 컴포지트의 repair 결합강도에 다른 표면처리의 효과를 평가하는 것이다. 알루미늄 옥사이드를 이용한 air abrasion, chair-side silica coating한 그룹들에서 대조군과 불산 적용에 비하여 유의하게 높은 결합강도를 보였다. 레진 수복물의 repair시에 air abrasion의 사용은 필요한 것으로 보이며 부가적으로 silane의 적용은 결합강도에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yesilyurt et al. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin : Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21: 251-261 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00271.x
  2. Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Blum IR, Wilson N. Teaching students the repair of resin based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134;317-23
  3. Major IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:257-62 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428661
  4. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:122-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5
  5. Blum IR, Schriever A, Heidemann D, et al. The repair of direct composite restorations: an international survey of the teaching of operative techniques and materials. Eur J Dent Educ 2003;7:41-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.00275.x
  6. Ozcan M, Barbosa SH, Melo RM. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Den Mater 2007;23 1276-1282 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.007
  7. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ, Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:173-80
  8. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Ebert J. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resinbased composite restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16: 17-22
  9. Guggenberger R. Rocatec system-adhesion by tribochemical coating. Dtsch Zahnnarztl Z. 1989;44: 874-6
  10. Luccena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas- Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:481-8 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116775
  11. Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC, Boyer DB. Effect of a silane coupling agent on composite repair strengths. Am J Dent 1994;7: 200-2
  12. Ozcan M. Alander P, Vallittu K. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. Springer Science+ Business Media 2005
  13. Larsen IB, Freund M, Munksgaard ECChange in surface hardness of BisGMA/TEGDMA polymer due to enzymatic action. J Dent Res. 1992 Nov;71(11): 1851-3 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710111701
  14. Soderholm KJ, Mukherjee R, Longmate J. Filler leachability of composites stored in distilled water or artificial saliva.J Dent Res. 1996 Sep;75(9):1692-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091201
  15. Sarrett DC, Coletti DP, Peluso AR. The effects of alcoholic beverages on composite wear. Dent Mater. 2000 Jan;16(1):62-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00088-3
  16. Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin-based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent. 1992 May-Jun;17(3):82-5.
  17. Mjor IA, Um CM. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea. Int Dent J. 1993 Aug;43(4): 311-6.
  18. Browning WD, Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 1996 Jul-Aug;21(4):160-6.
  19. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices.Prim Dent Care. 1999 Jan;6(1):17-20.
  20. Al-Negrish AR. Composite resin restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement in Jordan. Int Dent J. 2002 Dec;52(6):461-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00643.x
  21. Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct; 27(5):528-34.
  22. Ozcan M, Niedermeier W. IClinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 May-Jun ;15(3):299-302.
  23. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH, Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater 2007; 23:519-525 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.010
  24. Ruyter I. Unpolymerized surface layers on sealants. Acta Odontol Scand 1981;39:27-32 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358109162255
  25. van Kerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, etal. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982;61:791-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610062801
  26. Li J. Effects of surface properties on bond strength between layers of newly cured dental composites. J Oral Rehail 1997;24:358-60 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00508.x
  27. Yap AU, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effect of aging on repair bond strengths of a polyacid-modified composite resin. Oper Dent 1999;24; 371-376
  28. Ozcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental application: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:469-72 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124365
  29. Ozcan M, Lassila L, Raadschelders J. Effect of some parameters on silica-deposition on azirconia ceramic. J Dent Res 2005;84
  30. Andrew Joiner. Review of the effects of peroxide on enamel and dentin properties J Dent 2007;35:889-896 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.008
  31. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB. Evaluation of new methods for composite repair.Dent Mater. 1992 Nov;8(6):362-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90020-D
  32. Turner CW, Meiers JC. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin.Oper Dent. 1993 Sep-Oct;18(5):187-94.
  33. Kupiec KA, Barkmeier WW. Laboratory evaluation of surface treatments for composite repair. Oper Dent 1996;21:59-62
  34. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:173-80
  35. Tezvergil A, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Compositecomposite repair bond strength : effect of different adhesion primers. J Dent 2003;31(8) 521-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00093-9
  36. Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW. The tensile strength of composite repairs. J Dent 1980;8:17107
  37. Oztas N, Alacam A, Bardakci Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003;28:149-54