Korean System Dynamics Review (한국시스템다이내믹스연구)

Korean System Dynamics Society (한국시스템다이내믹스학회)
권호 표지

System Thinking Perspective on the Dynamic Relationship between Spatial Characteristics of Compact City and Urban Sustainability

시스템사고로 본 압축도시의 공간적 특성과 지속가능성과의 동태적 관계

  • 김리영 (중앙대학교 도시 및 지역계획학과) ;
  • 문태훈 (중앙대학교 도시 및 지역계획학과)
  • Received : 2010.06.15
  • Accepted : 2010.07.15
  • Published : 2010.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review relationship between spatial characteristics of compact city and urban sustainabiliy from system dynamics perspective using causal loop analysis. It has been argued that spatial characteristics of compact city, high population density and mixed land use, are positively related to urban sustainability. However, research results that are not consistent with pros of compact city argument have been accumulated too. It is especially true when spatial characteristics of compact city are examined with regard to each dimension of sustainablility: economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Reviewing each dimension of sustainability with regard to spatial characteristics based on causal loop analysis, this paper provides more clear understanding on relationship between compact city and sustainability. Also this paper provides a base for system dynamics simulation for future study.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도훈, 문태훈,김동환(1999). 시스템다이내믹스, 대영문화사
  2. 김동환(2000). 김대중 대통령의 시스템사고, 집문당, 아산재단연구총서, 제64집.
  3. 김동환(2007). 부동산 정책에 관한 시스템사고의 교훈, 한국시스템다이내믹스연구, 제8권1호. 187-209.
  4. 김동환(2009). 녹색성장에 관한 이명박 대통령의 인지지도 분석, 한국시스템다이내믹스연구, 제10권, 제4호, 39-51.
  5. 김선희, 정일호, 김성수, 정진규(2003). 자원절약적 국토발전방안 연구 : 국토.도시공간구조와 교통에너지소비와의 관계를 중심으로, 국토연구원
  6. 김승남, 이경환, 안건혁(2009). 압축도시 공간구조 특성이 교통에너지 소비와 대기오염 농도에 미치는 영향, 국토계획, 제44권, 제2호, pp.231-246.
  7. 김판석, 사득환(1999). 지속가능한 발전에 대한 이해와 개념 정립, 한국정치학회보, 제32권, 제4호, pp.71-88.
  8. 남기찬, 김홍석, 손민수(2008). 인구압축도와 교통에너지와의 관계 연구: 압축지표를 활용하여, 국토계획, 제43권, 제2호, 155-168.
  9. 문태훈(2007). 시스템사고로 본 지속가능한도시, 집문당, 아산재단연구총서, 제245집.
  10. 서혜미, 문태훈(2010). 녹색성장 프로그램의 성공요인 연구, 환경정책, 제18권, 제1호, pp.53-74.
  11. 송기욱, 남진(2009). 압축형 도시특성요소가 교통에너지 소비에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증분석, 국토계획, 제44권, 제5호, pp.193-206.
  12. 송미령(2003). 도시공간구조와 통근통행에 관한 연구 서울을 사례로, 서울대학교 대학원 박사 학위논문.
  13. 심교언(2001). 도시의 규모 및 밀도와 중심지 분포패턴이 교통에너지 소비에 미치는 영향연구, 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  14. 안건혁(2000). 도시형태와 에너지활용과의 관계 연구, 국토계획, 제35권, pp.9-17,
  15. 전명진(1995). 다핵도시공간구조하에서의 통근행태, 국토계획, 제30권, 제2호, pp.223-236.
  16. 조윤애, 김경환(2008). 도시개발 밀도가 에너지 효율성에 미친 영향, 한국정책학회보, 제17권, 제4호, pp.113-134.
  17. 조윤애(2009). 압축도시와 교통에너지소비의 관계에 대한 실증연구, 한국사회와 행정연구, 제 19권, 제4호, pp.113-132.
  18. 최열, 문설희, 임하경(2007). 도시특성 요소가 대기오염에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 국토계획, 제42권, 제3호, pp.191-201.
  19. 하성규, 김재익(1992). 주거지와 직장의 불일치 현상에 관한 연구, 국토계획, 제27권, 제1호, pp.51-71.
  20. 하성규, 김재익, 전명진(1995). 대도시공간구조 변화패턴에 관한 연구, 국토계획, 제30권, 제5호, pp.141-152.
  21. 하성규, 김재익, 전명진, 문태훈(2007). 지속가능한 도시개발론, 보성각.
  22. 황기연, 조용학(2005). 도심고밀개발 전략의 교통영향분석, 국토계획, 제40권, 제3호, pp.91-105.
  23. Ancell, S. and Michelle, T. F. 2008. The social sustainability of medium density housing: a conceptual model and Christchurch case study. Housing Studies. Vol.23(3):423-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802029990
  24. Banister, D. 1992. Energy use, transport and settlement patterns, in: M. Breheny (Ed.) Sustainable Development and Urban Form, London: Pion.
  25. Batty, S. 2006. Paradoxes of sustainable development : Property and participation, Property Management. Vol.24:207-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470610660110
  26. Breheny, M. 1992. The contradictions of the compact city, in M. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable development and urban form, Pion Limited. London.
  27. Breheny, M. 1995. The compact city and transport energy consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Vol.20:81-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/622726
  28. Breheny, M. 1997. Urban compaction: feasible and acceptable?. Cities. Vol.14:209-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00005-X
  29. Bunker, R. 1985. Urban consolidation and Australian cities". Built Environment. Vol.11:83-96.
  30. Bunker, R. 2005. Building the Connection Between Housing Needs and Metropolitan Planning in Sydney, Australia, Housing Studies. Vol.20(5):771-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030500214035
  31. Burchell, R. W. and Mukherji, S. 2003. Conventional Development Versus Managed Growth: The Costs of Sprawl. American Journal of Public Health. Vol.91(9); 1534-1540.1
  32. Burton, E. 2000. The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis., Urban Studies. Vol.37(11):1969-2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184
  33. Burton, E. 2003. Housing for Urban Renaissance : Implication for Social Equity, Housing Studies. Vol.18(4):537-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030304249
  34. Carruthers, J. I. and Ulfarsson, G.F. 2003. Urban sprawl and the cost of the public services, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Vol.30:503-522. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12847
  35. Carter, K. and Fortune, C. 2007. Sustainable development policy perceptions and practice in the UK social housing sector, Construction Management & Economics. Vol.25:399-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600922578
  36. Chiu, L. H. 2000. Environmental Sustainability of Hong Kong's Housing System and the Housing Process Model, International Planning Studies. Vol.5(1):45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/135634700111819
  37. Chiu, L. H. 2002. Social Equity in Housing in the Hong Kong Special Administrative, Sustainable Development. Vol.10:155-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.186
  38. Engelke, P. 2001. The Built Environment and Human Activity Patterns: Exploring the Impacts of Urban Form on Public Health. Journal of Planning Literature. Vol.16(2):202-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120122093339
  39. Galster, G., Hanson, R., Ratcliffe, M.R., Wolman, H., Coleman, S., and Freihage, J. 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate 12(4): 681-717.
  40. Garcia, D. and Riera. P. 2003. Expansion versus density in Barcelona: A valuation exercise. Urban Studies. Vol.40(10):1925-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000116040
  41. Gordon, P., and Richardson, H. W. 1997. Are compact cities a desirable planning goal?. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol.63:95-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369708975727
  42. Handy, S., M. Boarnet, R. Ewing. and R. Killingsworth. 2002. How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventative Medicine. Vol.23: 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
  43. Hirt, S. 2007. The Compact versus the Dispersed City: History of Planning Ideas on Sofia's Urban Form, Journal of Planning History. Vol.6:138-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513206301327
  44. Holden, E. and Norland, I. T. 2005. Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region. Urban Studies. Vol.42:2145-2166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500332064
  45. Jenks, M. and R. Burgess, 2000. Compact cities: Sustainable urban forms for developing countries, London: E. & F.N. Spon.
  46. Jenks, M., Burton, E. and Williams, K. 2002. The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form?. Spon E & F N.
  47. Lin, J. J. and Yang, A. T. 2006. Does the compact-city paradigm foster sustainability? An empirical study in Taiwan., Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. Vol.33:365-380. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31174
  48. McCarthy, J. 2002. Social Justice Equity And Housing: A New Agenda For Scotland?, Sustainable Development, Vol.10:163-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.194
  49. Neuman, M. 2005. The Compact City Fallacy, Journal of Planning Education and Research. Vol.25:11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
  50. Newman, P. W. G. and Kenworthy. 1991. Transport and Urban Form in Thirty Two of the World's Principle Cities, Transport Reviews, Vol.1:249-272.
  51. Randolph, B. 2006. Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future Implications". Urban Policy and Research. Vol.24(4):473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140601035259
  52. Stone, B., Mednick, A. C., Holloway, T. and Spak, S. N. 2007. Is Compact Growth Good for Air Quality?". Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol.73(4):404-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360708978521
  53. Sturm, R. and Cohen, D. 2004. Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health. Public Health. 118:488-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2004.02.007
  54. Thinh, N.X., Arlt, G., Heber, B., Hennersdorf, J. and Lehmann, I. 2002 Evaluation of urban land-use structures with a view to sustainable development, Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol.22:475- 492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00023-9
  55. Van Der Waals, J.F.M. 2000. The compact city and the environment: a review. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Journal of Economic & Social Geography, Vol.91:111-121.
  56. Whitehead, P. and Williams, J. Yates. 2006. Involving the Private Sector in Affordable Housing Provision: Can Australia Learn from the United Kingdom?, Urban Policy and Research. Vol.24:307-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600876851
  57. Wirth, L. 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology. Vol.44(1):1–24 https://doi.org/10.1086/217913
  58. Yang, Y. 2008. A Tale of Two Cities : Physical Form and Neighborhood Satisfaction in Metropolitan Portland and Charlotte, Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol.74.
  59. Zhang, M. 2004. The role of land use in travel mode Choice : Evidence from Boston and Hong Kong, Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol.70:344-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360408976383