Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

Citizen Satisfaction Model for Urban Parks and Greens - A Transactional Approach in the Case of Anyang City, Korea -

도시공원.녹지의 시민만족도 모형 - 안양시를 사례로 한 교류적 접근 -

  • Kim, Yoo-Ill (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Gyu (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • An, Jin-Sung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Choi, A-Hyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 김유일 (성균관대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 김정규 (성균관대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 안진성 (성균관대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 최아현 (성균관대학교 대학원 조경학과)
  • Received : 2010.07.01
  • Accepted : 2010.08.19
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to examine what factors citizens value in urban parks and green spaces in terms of usage and aesthetic value and to find ways to deal with the changing patterns of user satisfaction for these various green elements. To achieve this, the study developed a dynamic model employing a transactional approach to evaluate environmental quality for 1999 and 2007 in Anyang City as well as a conceptual model of parks and greens satisfaction. This study relied on an empirical study method including the 1999 and 2007 green conditional survey and citizen questionnaires totaling 573 in the year 1999 and 982 in the year 2007. As a result, first, the factor 'urban parks' is the most important factor and 'cityscape' is the second most important factor in parks and greens satisfaction(PGS). Second, PGS in turn causes environmental quality satisfaction(EQS), which is related to two items--'urban livability' and 'aesthetic quality'--in the model. This means that PGS is the intervening variable of urban livability. Third, the factor analysis resulted in six factors: cityscape, urban green, linear facilities, urban parks, riverside green, and urban forest. 'Riverside green' emerged as a factor in 2007 as a result of public participation in the 'Anyang River Revitalization Project'. Fourth, through a transactional view, the environmental changes result in either a change in or stability of public attitude. The levels of satisfaction were elevated but patterns of satisfied-unsatisfied items remained unchanged for most factors. The perception of riverside a greenway and linear surface facilities(pedestrian walkways, biking and jogging trails, etc.) have changed positively. PGS changed significantly in 2007, as a result of urban events and development, including parks, rivers and greenways which were built through the joint effort of the local government and civic participation.

본 연구의 목적은 도시공원과 녹지공간의 이용과 미적 측면에서 도시민들이 중요하게 가치를 두고 있는 요인들을 평가하고, 다양한 공원녹지 요소에 대해 이용자 만족도 변화를 다루는 방법을 찾는 것이다. 이를 위해서 본 연구에서는 안양시의 1999년과 2007년의 환경의 질을 평가하기 위해 교류적 접근방법을 이용한 동적모형과 공원녹지만족도 개념모형을 발전시킨다. 그리고 실증적 연구방법으로 1999년과 2007년의 공원녹지 환경 조사와 1999년의 573개, 2007년의 982개의 설문을 포함한다. 분석결과, 첫째, 공원녹지만족도의 가장 중요한 요인은 '도시공원'이고, 그 다음으로 '도시경관'이었다. 둘째, 모형에서 공원녹지만족도는 도시거주성과 경관의 질을 포함한 도시환경의 질적 만족도의 원인이 된다. 셋째, 요인분석결과, 평가인자는 도시경관, 도시녹지, 선형시설, 도시공원, 하천녹지, 산림녹지의 6개 요인이었으며 2007년에는 시민들이 참여한 '안양천 되살리기 운동'으로 인해 하천녹지 요인이 새로이 나타났다. 넷째, 교류적 관점에서 환경변화 결과는 시민들의 태도변화 측면, 안정성 측면의 양면을 보여주고 있다. 만족도는 향상되었지만 대부분의 요인에서 만족-불만족 항목의 패턴은 변화되지 않았다. 녹도를 포함한 하천녹지와 선형시설(보행자전용도로, 자전거도로, 조깅로 등)은 긍정적으로 변화되었다. 2007년에 공원녹지만족도는 안양시의 노력과 시민운동으로 조성된 도시공원 및 하천과 녹도로 인해 두드러지게 향상되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김계수(2010) Amos 18.0 구조방정식 모형 분석. 서울: 한나래출판사.
  2. 심준영, 김유일, 이시영(2010) 공공서비스로서 도시공원녹지평가. 한국조경학회지 37(6): 19-27.
  3. 안양시(2000) 안양시 그린플랜 기본정책 수립연구. 안양시청.
  4. 안양시(2009) 안양시 공원녹지 기본계획. 안양시청.
  5. 이학식, 임지훈(2007) Amos 18.0 구조방정식 모형분석과 AMOS 6.0. 파주: 법문사.
  6. Aitken, S. C. and E. M. Bjorklund(1988) Transactional and transformational theories in behavioral geography. Professional Geographer 40(1): 54-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00054.x
  7. Altman, I.(1981) The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy. Personal Space, Territory and Crowding. New York: Irvington.
  8. Amerigo, M. and J. I. Aragones(1997) A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17(1): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0038
  9. Bonaiuto, M., F. Fornara and M. Bonnes(2003) Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: a confirmation study on the city Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning 65: 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00236-0
  10. Campbell, A. P. Converse and W. Rodgers(1976) The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  11. Dewey, J. and A. F. Bentley(1949) Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon.
  12. Francescato, G., S. Weidenmann, J. R. Anderson, and R. Chenoweth(1977) Predictors of residents' satisfaction in high-rise and lowrise housing. In Conway, D.. eds, Human Response to Tall Buildings. Dowden: Hutchinson and Ross, Inc.
  13. Kamp, I. V., K. Leidelmeijer, G. Marsman, and A. D. Hollander(2003) Urban environmental quality and human well-being: towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts. Landscape and Urban Planning 65: 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3
  14. Marans, R. W. and M. Couper(2000) Measuring the quality of community life: a program for longitudinal and comparative international research. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities 2: 386-400.
  15. Marans, R. W. and K. Spreckelmeyer(1981) Evaluating Built Environments: A Behavioral Approach. Michigan: University of Michigan Survey Research.
  16. Mitchell, G.(2000) Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway. Sustaining Human Settlement: A Challenge for the New Millennium. UK: Urban International Press.
  17. Pepper, S. C.(1942) World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  18. Pepper, S. C.(1967) Concept and Quality: A World Hypotheses. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
  19. Shafer. C. S., B. K Lee and S. Tumer(2000) A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and Urban Planning 49: 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00057-8
  20. Weidemann, S. and J. R. Anderson(1985) A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. in Altman. I. and C. M. Werner. eds., Home Environment. New York: Plenum Press.