참고문헌
- 교육과학기술부 (2010). 올해부터 시험 없이 과학영재 발굴. 교육과학기술부 2010년 4월 1일 보도자료.
- 김영천 (2006). 질적연구방법론 I. 문음사.
- 박춘성 (2006). 초등영재선별을 위한 평정척도의 타당화 연구. 박사논문. 서울대학교.
- 서울경제신문 2010. 2. 1일자 사회면 기사: 방과 후 학교 형태 '영재학급' 설치.
- 서혜애 (2009). 세계의 영재교육기관에 대한 이해. 과학고 입학사정관 전문연수 자료집. KAIST 과학영재교육연구원.
- 이순묵 (1999). 대학생 선발용 면접의 기능과 방법에 대한 통합적 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19, 56-75.
- 이신동 (2006). 영재판별을 위한 지능검사의 타당성 고찰. 영재와 영재교육, 5(1).
- 이신동, 이정규, 박춘성 (2009). 최신영재교육학개론. 학지사.
- 한국교육개발원(KEDI) (2008). 한국교육개발원 영재교육센터 영재교육현황.
- Archambault, F., Westberg, K., Brown, S., Hallmark, B., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W.(1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
- Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1996). Talent beyond words: Identification of potential talent in dance and music in elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000206
- Bolig, E., & Day, J. (1993). Dynamic assessment of giftedness: The promise of assessing training responsiveness. Roeper Review, 16, 110-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553552
- Borland, J. H. (1978). Teacher identification of the gifted: A new look. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 22-32.
- Borland, J. H. (2008). Identification, In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp.261-280). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800402
- Bracken, B. (2000). An approach for identifying underrepresented populations for G/T programs. Presentation at the College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
- Brown, S., Renzulli, J., Gubbins, E., Siegle, D., Zhang, W., & Chen, C. (2005). Assumptions underlying the identification of gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1). 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900107
- Clark, B. (2008). Growing up gifted: developing the potential of children at home and at school (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Person Prentice Hall.
- Clasen, D. R., Middleton, J. A., & Connell, T. J. (1994). Assessing artistic and problem-solving performance in minority and nonminority students using a nontraditional multidimensional approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800104
- Cleary, T. A., Humperys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15-41.
- Coleman, L. (1994). Portfolio assessment: A key to identifying hidden talents and empowering teachers of young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800203
- Coleman, M. R. (2003). The identification of students who are gifted. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Digest ED480431).
- Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (1999). The 1998-99 state of the states gifted and talented report. Longmont, CO: Author.
- Cunningham, C. M., Callahan, C. M., Plucker, J. A., Roberson, C., & Rapkin, A. (1998). Identifying hispanic students of outstanding talent: Psychometric integrity of a peer nomination form. Exceptional Children, 64, 197-210.
- Ford, D. Y. (2003). desegregating gifted education. In J. Borland(Ed.), Rethinking gifted education(pp.143-158). New York: Teachers College Press.
- Friedman, R. C., & Rogers, K. B. (1998). Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
- Gardner, J. W. (1984). Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too?, New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company.
- Gear, G. H. (1978). Effects of Training on Teachers' Accuracy in the Identification of Gifted Children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(1), 90-97.
- Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-ofprocessing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
- Gronlund, N. E., & Waugh, C. K. (2009). Assessment of student achievement. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hadaway, N., & Marek-Schroer, M. F. (1992). Multidimensional assessment of the gifted minority student. Roeper Review, 15, 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553467
- Johnsen, S. (1997). Assessment beyond definitions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 136-152.
- Lee, S.-Y., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2006). Comparison between talent search students qualifying via scores on standardized tests and via parent nomination. Roeper Review, 28, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554355
- Maker, C. J., Nielson, A. B., & Rogers, J. A. (1994). Giftedness, diversity, and problemsolving: Multiple intelligences and diversity in educational settings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27, 4-19.
- McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1998). The Gifted Evaluation Scale-Technical Manual(2nd ed.). Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
- Monks, F. J. & Pfluger, R. (2005). Gifted education in 21 European countries: Inventory and perspective. Radbond University Nijmegen.
- Naglieri, J. A. (1999). The essentials of CAS assessment. New York: Wiley.
- Pfeiffer, S. I. (2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied school Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.
- Pfeiffer, S., & Blei, S., (2008). Gifted identification beyond the IQ test. In Pfeiffer, S. I., Handbook of Giftedness in Children, pp. 177-196.
- Pfeiffer, S., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. TX: Psych Corp.
- Pfeiffer, S., Kumtepe, A., & Rosado, J. (2006). Gifted identification: Measuring changes in a student's profile of abilities using the Gifted Rating Scales. The School Psychologist, 60, 106-111.
- Renzulli, J. S. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
- Roedell, W. C., Jackson, N. E., & Robinson, H. B. (1980). Gifted young children. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
- Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for identifying gifted students: Age 5 through 18. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
- Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300403
- Schack, G. D., & Starko, A. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 346-363.
- Shore, B. M., & Tsiamis, A. (1986). Identification by provision. In K. A. Hellerand J. F. Feldhusen(eds). Identifying and Nurturing their Gifted. Berne: Huber.
- Smutny, J. F. (1998). The young gifted child: Potential and promise, and anthology. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600403
- Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
- VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 67-72.
- VanTassel-Baska, J., Feng, A. X., & Evans, B. L. (2007). Patterns of identification and performance among gifted students identified through performance Tasks: a three-year analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 218-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302717
- VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds. & Trans.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(pp. 92-104). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.