Performance Evaluation of Lab-scale High Rate Coagulation System for CSOs Treatment

강우유출수의 신속한 처리를 위한 고속응집시스템의 성능 평가 -실험실 규모 장치를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2010.09.30
  • Accepted : 2010.10.14
  • Published : 2010.10.15

Abstract

To evaluate the performance of high rate coagulation system(HRCS) for CSOs treatment, fundamental function of lab scale HRCS has been tested by using the Jar tester and lab scale HRCS. The optimum pH dose by Streaming Current value was found in the range of 5.3~6.0 in Fe(III), and in the range of 5.8~6.6 in Al(III) and the optimum chemical dose were 0.44mM of $Al_2(SO_4)_3$ and 0.93mM of $FeCl_3$. The removal efficiencies at optimum $Al_2(SO_4)_3$ dose were 75%($TCOD_{Cr}$), 97%(TP), 95%(SS) and 96%(turbidity), respectively. And the removal efficiency of particles with less than $5{\mu}m$ of diameter was 70% and that of particles with higher than $5{\mu}m$ of diameter was 90%. The optimum alum dose in lab scale HRCS was 150mg/L, and the treatment efficiency was the best with addition of 1.0mg/L polymer. The effect of Micro sand addition was not clear, because the depth of the sediment tank in lab scale HRCS was not long enough. But the HRT of this lab scale HRCS was able to be shorten less then 7 minutes by adding the micro sand. The surface loading rates with respect to using different chemicals were 0.43m/h with alum only, 5.78m/h with alum and polymer and 6.22m/h with alum, polymer and micro sand. As a result, HRCS using coagulant, polymer and micro sand developed in this study was evaluated to be very effective for CSOs treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. 박세진, 김창균, 윤태일(2002), 가중응집제와 슬럿지 반송을 통한 고속응집공정에 관한 연구, 대한환경공학회지, 24(8), pp 1324-1338.
  2. 수생태복원 사업단(2009), 효율적 비점오염원 관리기술개발 연차보고서(2단계 2차년도), 연구보고서.
  3. 환경부(2008), 한강수계 비점오염저감시설 모니터링 및 유지관리 2차년도보고서. 연구보고서
  4. 황보봉형, 김정숙, 이병헌, 강임석(1997), 산업 폐수(물리화학적 처리 I) : 낙동강 원수내 Al(III)계 염과 Fe(III)계 염의 응집제를 이용한 유기물 응집에 관한 연구, 대한환경공학회 춘계 학술연구발표회논문집, pp. 329-332.
  5. Amirtharajah. A. and O'Melia. C. R.(1990), "Coagulation process: Destabilization, mixing, and flocculation", Chapter 6. In Water Quality and Treatment. 2nd ed., pontius. F. W., New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 269-365.
  6. APHA(1995), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edition.
  7. Crozes. G., White, P. and Marshall, M.(1995). Enhanced coagulation: its effect on NOM removal and chemical costs. J. AWWA, 87(1), pp. 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1995.tb06303.x
  8. Roberts C. Cheng, stuart W. Krasner, James F. Green. and kevin L. waiter. (1995) Enhanced coagulation a preliminary evalution. J. AWWA, 87(2), pp. 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1995.tb06321.x
  9. Tang H. and Stumm W.(1987), 'The Coagulating Behaviors of Fe(III) Polymeric Species I. Water Research, 21(1), pp.115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(87)90106-0