IN VITRO STUDY OF DEMINERALIZATION INHIBITION EFFECT AND FLUORIDE UPTAKE INTO ADJACENT TEETH OF LIGHT-CURED FLUORIDE-RELEASING RESTORATIVES

수종의 불소방출 수복재의 탈회억제 효과 및 불소침투에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Song-Yi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Yeong-Chul (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Hong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 김송이 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최성철 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김광철 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 최영철 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 박재홍 (경희대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.05.10
  • Accepted : 2010.08.13
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of light cured fluoride-releasing materials on the inhibition of demineralization. In addition, the pattern of fluoride uptake of adjacent tooth structure was analyzed with EPMA. Eighty intact premolars were restored with $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250(control group, composite), Fuji Filling $LC^{TM}$(RMGI), Dyract $AP^{(R)}$ (compomer) and Beautifil II(giomer). Restored teeth were stored in distilled water for 30 days. Then sixty teeth(n=15) were exposed to demineralizing solution(pH 4.3). Demineralized teeth were bisected and polished. The specimens were observed with confocal laser scanning microscope. The depth of outer lesion and the thickness of inhibition zone were measured. Remained twenty teeth(n=5) were bisected for fluoride uptake analysis. The fluoride analysis were taken at enamel-restoration interface and dentin-restoration interface by electron probe micro-analyzer. The results are as follows: 1. The depth of outer lesion of Fuji Filling $LC^{TM}$ Dyract AP, Beautifil II was shallower than that of $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250 at the margin of restoration(p<0.05). 2. The thickness of caries inhibition zone of Fuji Filling $LC^{TM}$, Dyract AP, Beautifil II was greater than that of $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250 at the margin of restoration(p<0.05). 3. Fuji Filling $LC^{TM}$, Dyract AP, Beautifil II groups showed the greater fluoride uptake into enamel and dentine around restoration than $Filtek^{TM}$ Z250 group. 4. In dentin the difference of fluoride concentration were greater than in enamel, and Dyract AP showed the greatest fluoride concentration in dentin.

자이오머(Giomer)는 레진강화형글라스아이오노머에 견줄 만큼 불소방출량이 많다고 하나, 우식예방 효과에 관한 연구들이 많지 않아 임상적용에 대한 근거가 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구는 자이오머(BF 군)를 포함하여 레진강화형글라스아이오노머(FF 군), 콤포머(DA 군)와 대조군인 콤포짓(FZ 군)의 우식억제 효과와 주변 치질로의 불소침투 양상을 비교하기 위하여, 공초점레이저주사현미경과 전자탐침미세분석기를 이용하여 각 수복재의 우식예방 효과를 비교하였으며, 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 수복물 주위 이차 인공우식에서 법랑질 외측병변의 깊이는 FZ 군에서 가장 깊었으며, BF 군이 가장 작게 나타났다(p<0.05). 2. 수복물과 법랑질 계면에 나타난 탈회억제층의 두께를 관찰한 결과 FZ 군이 가장 작게 나타났으며, FF, DA, BF 간에는 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(p<0.05). 3. 법랑질에 침투된 불소농도는 BF, FF, DA의 순으로 높게 나타났다. 4. 상아질에 침투된 불소농도는 DA, BF, FF의 순으로 높게 나타났으며, 이는 상아질-수복물의 접착 계면에 영향 받는 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Dahl JE, Eriksen HM : Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations. Scandinavian J Dent Res, 86:404-407, 1978.
  2. Mjor IA : Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent, 10:88-92, 1985.
  3. Mjor IA, Toffenetti F : Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int, 31:165- 179, 2000.
  4. Arends J, Dijkman G, Dijkman A : Review of fluoride release and secondary caries reduction by fluoridating composites. Adv Dent Res, 9:367-376, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374950090040501
  5. Brannstrom M, Nordenvall KJ : Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of concise enamel bond. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavities. J Dent Res, 57:3-10, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345780570011301
  6. Sjodn L, Uusitalo M, Van diken J : Resin-modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in direct Class V and Class II sandwich restorations. Swed Dent J, 20:77-86, 1996.
  7. Yap AU, Lim CC, Neo JC : Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems. Quintessence Int, 26:817-820, 1995.
  8. Annette Wiegand, Wolfgang Buchalla, Tomas Attin : Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials- Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343-362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  9. Creanor SL, Carruther LM, Saunders WP, et al. : Fluoride uptake and release characteristics of glass ionomer cements. Caries Res, 28:322-328, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261996
  10. Forsten L. : Short-and long-term fluoride release from glass ionomers and other fluoride-containing filling materials in vitro. Scand J Dent, 98:179-185, 1990.
  11. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, et al. : Artificial secondary caries around two new Fcontaing restoratives. Oper Dent, 23: 81-86, 1998.
  12. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, et al. : Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res, 18:250-257, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260773
  13. Forss H, Seppa L : Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res, 98:173-178, 1990.
  14. Skartveit L, Tveit AB, Totdal B, et al. : In vivo fluoride uptake in enamel and dentine from fluoride containing materials. J Dent Child, 57:97-100, 1990.
  15. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silversone LM : Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int, 17:527-532, 1986.
  16. Tyas MJ : Cariostatics effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J, 36: 236-239, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb04710.x
  17. Varpio M, Noren JG : Artificial caries in primary and permanent teeth adjacent to composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations. Pediatr Dent, 16:107-109, 1994.
  18. Guggenberger R, May R, Stefan KP : New trends in glass ionomer chemistry. Biomaterials, 19:479-483, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00127-0
  19. Robertello FJ, Coffey JP, Lynde TA, et al. : Fluoride release of glass ionomer-based luting cements in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 82:172-176, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70152-6
  20. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, et al. : Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer, and resin composite. Dent Mater, 20:789-795, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.11.009
  21. Ikemura K, Tay FR, Endo T, et al. : A review of chemical-approach and ultramorphological studies on the development of fluoride-releasing dental adhesives comprising new pre-reacted glass ionomer(PRG) fillers. Dent Mater J, 27:315-339, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.315
  22. Yap AU, Wang X, Wu X, et al. : Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study. Biomaterials, 25:2179-2185, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.003
  23. Okuyama K, Nakata T, Pereira PNR, et al. : Prevention of artificial caries:Effect of bonding agent, resin composite and topical fluoride application. Oper Dent, 31:135-142, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/0361-7734(2006)31[135:POACEO]2.0.CO;2
  24. Itota T, Nakabo S, Narukami T, et al. : Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine. J Dent, 33:147-154, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.003
  25. Attar N, Onen A : Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26:289-296, 2002.
  26. Tam LE, Chan GP, Yim P : In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin-modified glassionomer restorations. Oper Dent, 22:4-14, 1997.
  27. Hicks MJ, Silverstone LM : Fissure sealants and dental enamel: a histological study of microleakage in vitro. Caries Res, 16:353-360, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260620
  28. Kidd EAM, Siverstone LM : Remineralization in vitro of artificial caries-like lesions produced in relation to amalgam restorations. Caries Res, 12:238-242, 1978. https://doi.org/10.1159/000260338
  29. Banerjee A, Boyde A : Autofluorescence and mineral content of carious dentine: scanning optical and backscattered electron microscopic studies. Caries Res, 32:219-226, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016456
  30. Banerjee A, Sherriff M, Kidd EAM, et al. : A confocal microscopy study relating the autofluorescene of carious dentine to its microhardness. Br Dent J, 187:206-210, 1999.
  31. van der Veen MH, ten Bosch JJ : The influence of mineral loss on the auto-fluorescent behavior of in vitro demineralized dentine. Caries Res, 30:93-99, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1159/000262143
  32. 박성호 : 수복용 compomer의 항우식성에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지, 27:12-15, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.1.012
  33. Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, et al. : Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res, 11:453-461, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110041201
  34. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM : Resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations and in vitro secondary caries formation in coronal enamel. Dent Mater, 31:570-578, 2000.
  35. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ, et al. : Caries inhibition by a resin-modified and a conventional glass ionomer cement, in vitro. J Dent, 24:91-94, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00051-8
  36. Millar BJ, Abiden F, Nicholson JW : In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite resins("compomers"). J Dent, 26:133-136, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00091-7
  37. Gonzalez EH, Yap AUJ, Hsu SCY : Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials. Oper Dent, 29:578-585, 2004.
  38. Donly KJ, Grandgenett C : Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent, 11:245-248.
  39. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Milano M, et al. : Compomer materials and secondary caries formation. Am J Dent, 13:231-234, 2000
  40. Okuda M, Pereira PNR, Nikaido T, et al. : Evaluation of in vitro secondary caries using confocal laser scanning microscope and X-Ray analytical microscope. Am J Dent, 16:191-196.
  41. Itota T, Nakabo S, Iwai Y, et al. : Inhibition of artificial secondary caries by fluoride-releasing adhesives on root dentin. J Oral Rehabil, 29:523-527, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00858.x
  42. Shinohara MS, Yamauti M, Inoue G, et al. : Evaluation of antibacterial and fluoride-releasing adhesive system on dentin microtensile bond strength and acid-base challenge. Dent Mater J, 25:545-552, 2006. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.545
  43. Tsuchiya S, Nikaido T, Sonoda H, et al. : Ultrastructure of the dentine-adhesive interface after acidbase challenge. J Adhes Dent, 6:183-190, 2004.
  44. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, et, al. : Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent, 27:259;265, 2002.
  45. Attar N, Onen A : Fluoride release and uptake characteristics of aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil, 29:791-798, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00902.x
  46. Kirsten L. Van Landuyt, Johan Snauwaert, et al. : Systemic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials, 28:3757;3785, 2007.
  47. Hara AT, Queiroz CS, Freitas PM, et al. : Fluoride release and secondary caries inhibition by adhesive systems on root dentine. Eur J Oral Sci, 113:245-250, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00214.x
  48. 정회민, 김용기 : 수종의 구강 위생 방법에 따른 인공 초기 우식 법랑질의 재석회화에 관한 비교 생체 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 18:94-116, 1991.
  49. 김정욱 : 불소방출 치면열구전색제의 항우식 효과에 관한 실험적 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 25:849-857, 1998.
  50. Kawai K, Tantbirojn D, Kamalawat AS, et al. : In vitro enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from three fluoride-containg composites. Caries Res, 32:463-469, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016488
  51. Pereira PN, Yamada T, Inokoshi S, et al. : Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems. J Dent, 26:479-485, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00059-6