DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Consumer Perception of Social Presence in E-tail Websites

  • Park, Jee-Sun (Dept. of Retail, Hospitality, & Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee) ;
  • Fairhurst, Ann (Dept. of Retail, Hospitality, & Tourism Management, The University of Tennessee)
  • Received : 2010.05.20
  • Accepted : 2010.06.27
  • Published : 2010.06.06

Abstract

This study examines the role of consumer perception of social presence in e-tailing websites. The study proposes that the perception of social presence influences the variables that are important for e-tailers to build a relationship with consumers, which are the attitudes of consumers toward an e-tailer and patronage intentions toward the e-tailer. This study hypothesizes that the attitudes of consumers are influenced by individual perceptions of social presence that guide their patronage intentions. Consumer trust and their affective states are hypothesized to serve as mediators in the relationship between consumer perception of social presence and the attitudes toward an e-tailer. Sixty-one female students were used to test the proposed model. The findings from regression and mediation analyses supported all hypotheses, suggesting that the perception of social presence plays a significant role in consumer shopping habits for apparel: consumer perception of social presence influences consumer trust and affective states that modify attitudes toward an e-tailer and consumer patronage intentions. The theoretical and managerial implications for apparel e-tailers are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Bagozzi, R. P., Gopinath, M., & Nyer,P. U.(1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 184-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272005
  2. Barlow, A. K. J., Siddiqui, N. Q., & Mannion, M. (2004). Developments in information and communication technologies for retail marketing channels. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(3), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550410524948
  3. Baron, R., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  4. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborgs dilemma: Progress embodiment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrived May 18, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vo13/issue2/biocca2.html
  5. Cowles, D., & Crosby, L. A. (1990). Consumer acceptance of interactive media in service marketing encounters. Service Industries Journal, 10(3), 521-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069000000056
  6. Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in Web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
  7. Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison process. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100-118. https://doi.org/10.1086/209385
  8. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  9. Day, G S. (1969). A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9(3), 29-35.
  10. Donovan, R. J.,& Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 35-57.
  11. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: HBJ.
  12. Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10064
  13. Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195-219. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240510590360
  14. Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00106-1
  15. Freeman, L. (2000). Keeping 'em happy. Marketing News, 34(10), 21.
  16. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C. W., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005005
  17. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2003). Managing user trust in B2C e-services, e-Service Journal, 2(2), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2979/ESJ.2003.2.2.7
  18. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004). Consumer trust in B2C e-commerce and the importance of social presence: Experiments in e-products and e-services. Omega, 32(6), 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006
  19. Grewal, D., Baker, J., Levy, M., & Voss, G B. (2003). The effects of wait expectations and store atmosphere evaluations on patronage intentions in service-intensive retail stores. Journal of Retailing, 79(4), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2003.09.006
  20. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data anlaysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  21. Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2005-6). The impact of infusing social presence in the Web interface: An investigation across product types. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 31-55.
  22. Holzwarth, M., Janiszewski, C., & Neumann, M. M. (2006). The influence of avatars on online consumer shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.19
  23. Jeong, M., & Lambert, C. U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers' behavioral intentions to use lodging Web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(2), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4319(00)00041-4
  24. Keng, C.-J., & Lin, H.-Y. (2006). Impact of telepresence levels on internet advertising effects. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 9(1), 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.82
  25. Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2009). Adoption of sensory enabling technology for online apparel shopping. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1101-1120. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976384
  26. Korgaonkar, P. K., Lund, D., & Price, B. (1985). A structural equations approach toward examination of store attitude and store patronage behavior. Journal of Retailing, 61(2), 39-60.
  27. Laaksonen, M. (1993). Retail patronage dynamics: Learning about daily shopping behavior in contexts of changing retail structures. Journal of Business Research, 28(112), 3-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(93)90024-J
  28. Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/63.4.967
  29. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  30. Moon, Y. (2000). Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.1086/209566
  31. Moorman, C, Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252059
  32. Mukherjee, A., & Nath, P. (2007). Role of electronic trust in online retailing. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9/10), 1173-1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773390
  33. Nass, C., Moon, Y.,& Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(10), 864-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x
  34. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44.
  35. Pan, Y., & Zinkhan, G M. (2006). Determinants of retail patronage: A meta-analytical perspective. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.11.008
  36. Quarterly Retail E-Commerce Sales: 4th Quarter 2009. (2009). U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved April 1, 2010, from http://www.census.gov/retail/mrts/www/data/pdf/0904.pdf
  37. Reeves, R, & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: CSLI Publications.
  38. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-Ioyalty. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113.
  39. Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science. 3(4), 475-500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.475
  40. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research. 15(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
  41. Short, J., & Williams, E. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
  42. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J., & Sabol, B. (2002). Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 15-37. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.15.18449
  43. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: Sociological Association.
  44. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00779.x
  45. Straub, D., & Karahanna, E. (1998). Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization Science, 9(2), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.2.160
  46. Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007). Can a retail Web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143

Cited by

  1. Domestic Research Trends in IT Fashion vol.14, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.4.614