A Study on Development Strategies of the Korean Fisheries Outlook Project based on AHP

AHP 기법을 이용한 우리나라 수산업관측사업의 추진방향에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2009.12.14
  • Accepted : 2009.12.25
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to suggest major strategies and necessary new projects for the medium- and long-term development of the Korean Fisheries Outlook Project. To suggest the Korean Fisheries Outlook Center with the above purpose, this paper employs Analytic Hierarchy Process analysis based on surveys obtained by special groups related with the KFOP. The survey is broadly composed of two goals; the medium- and long-term development directions and setting up of new furtherance projects. Each goal has upper and lower strategies respectively. The first goal, the medium- and long-term development directions, has four factors as upper strategies. The upper strategies are composed of accuracy, efficiency, timeliness, and political effectiveness of the fisheries outlook information. In addition, each upper strategy has three lower strategies respectively. For example, accuracy of the fisheries outlook information includes strength of data collection function, strength of satellite photography function, and strength of data analysis function. The second goal, setting up of new furtherance projects, has three factors as upper strategies. The upper strategies consist of accuracy promotion of outlook information using high-technique, field expansion of outlook species, and strength of analyzing function on oversea fisheries information. Each upper strategy has three lower strategies respectively. For instant, accuracy promotion of outlook information using high-technique has strength of information analysis function covered from production to consumption, strength of satellite information function, and structure of forecasting model on demand and supply by outlook species. The above upper and lower strategies were analytically drawn out through insightful interviews with special groups such as officials of the government, presidents of the producer and distributor groups, and researchers of the Korea Maritime Institute and other research institutes. As a result of AHP analysis, first, priorities of upper strategies with the medium- and long-term development directions are analyzed as accuracy, timeliness, political effectiveness, and efficiency in order. Also, priorities of all lower strategies reflecting priorities of upper strategies are examined as includes strength of data collection function on the fisheries outlook information, delivery of rapid information on outlook products for all people interested, strength of data analysis function on fisheries outlook information, strength of consumption outlook function on fish products, and strength of early warning system for domestic fish products in order. Second, priorities of upper strategies with the setting up of new furtherance projects are analyzed as accuracy promotion of outlook information using high-technique, field expansion of outlook species, and strength of analysis function on oversea fisheries information in order. In addition, priorities of all lower strategies reflecting priorities of upper strategies are examined as building up of forecasting model on demand and supply by outlook species, strength of information analysis function covering all steps from production to consumption, expansion of consumption outlook for consumers, strength of movement analysis function of oversea farming industry, and outlook expansion of farming species.

Keywords

References

  1. 강진규 외 역, AHP의 이론과 실제, 인터비젼, 2008, pp.181-182.
  2. 김관수 외, 농업관측사업의 평가 및 중장기 발전방향방안, 한국농촌경제연구원, 2008, p.170.
  3. 김정욱 외, "AHP를 이용한 수협 어업인 신용평가모형에 관한 연구", 한국협동조합연구, Vol.25(2), 2007, pp.143-157.
  4. 박철형.표희동, "AHP 기법을 이용한 바다목장화사업 성공요인에 대한 비교평가연구", 수산경영론집, Vol.38(3), 2007, pp.67-88.
  5. 이강우, "어류양식장 입지선택을 위한 계측분석과정(AHP)모형", 수산경영론집, Vol.38(1), 2007, pp.19-45.
  6. 장영수.박철형, "AHP를 이용한 수입수산물의 비경제적 민감도분석에 관한 연구", 수산경영론집, Vol.37(3), 2006, pp.65-83.
  7. 조근태 외, 앞서가는 리더들의 계층분석적 의사결정, 동현출판사, 2003, pp.5-12.
  8. 한국해양수산개발원, 수산관측백서, 한국해양수산개발원 수산업관측센터, 2006, p.379.
  9. 한국해양수산개발원, 수산업관측사업의 평가 및 성과보고서, 한국해양수산개발원 수산업관측센터, 2009, p.219.
  10. Nielsen, J. R. and Mathiesen,C., "Stakeholder preferences for Danish Fisheries Management of Sand Eel and Norway Pout," Fisheries Research, Vol.77, 2006, pp.92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.002
  11. Pascoe, S. et al., "Stakeholder Objective Preferences in Australian Commonwealth Managed Fisheries," Marine Policy, Vol.33, 2009, pp.750-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.008
  12. Utne, I. B., "Are the Smallest Fishing Vessels the Most Sustainable?-Trade-off Analysis of Sustainability Attributes," Marine Policy, Vol.32, 2008, pp.465-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.016
  13. Saaty T. L., The Analytic Hierachy Process, McGraw-HilI, New York, 1980, pp.49-70.