International Journal of Contents

  • 제6권3호
  • /
  • Pages.38-46
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1738-6764(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7504(eISSN)
한국콘텐츠학회 (The Korea Contents Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Research of Big Five Personality Factors Affecting Creativity - The Case of K Institute -

  • Lee, Kil-Whoan (Dept. of Business Administration Chungbuk University) ;
  • Song, Ha-Sik (Dept. of Business Administration Chungbuk University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Hee (Dept. of Technology Administration University of Technology and Education)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.03
  • 심사 : 2010.08.18
  • 발행 : 2010.09.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study, five personality types of employees have any impact on their creativity, a systematic and comprehensive study of literary research and demonstration studies were parallel. Results of the research employee of the extroversion, agreeableness of their creativity (+) showed the impact. In addition, sincerity, openness to experience, personality and creativity of employee creativity (+) for influencing said. Neuroticism to creativity, but nature does not affect any found. This study, five personality types that affect employee creativity of individuals by examining the relationship between personality type and creativity by presenting a model for the study, employees' personality types can have on creativity and offers a realistic alternative to the theory presented you can find the meaning in that. These theoretical and empirical validation of the results of employee productivity oriented organizations, including human resource management in a systematic and reasonable for the type of personality tests are being conducted on the administrative feasibility is expected to be able to provide. Finally, based on the results of these studies, management and administrative implications and future research directions presented.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. D.W.Fiske, "Consistency of the factorial Structures of Personality Ratings from different Sources. : Journal of Abnormal And Social Psychology, vol.44, 1949. pp.329-344. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198
  2. D.Y.Kim and T.Y.Yu,"a variety of direct military in nature, the 5 factors andduties", the relationship between corporatemanagement research. 1997. The 5th Kwangwoon University Corporate Management Institute: 69-94 in quotes (Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. 1995.
  3. E.C. Tupes and R.E. Christal, Recurrent Personality Factors Based on Trait Ratings. USAF ASD Technical Report, 1961. pp.61-97.
  4. F. Barron and D.M.Harrington, "Creativity, Intelligence and Personality", Annual Review of Psychology. vol.32, 1981. pp. 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255
  5. G.B.Baek, "Organizational Behavior Research", Changminsa. 2002.
  6. H. Gardner, "Creating Minds". New York: Basic Books. 1993.
  7. I.S.Choe, "creativity for understanding," the six questions. Korea Psychology : General, vol.17. no.1, 1998. pp.25-27.
  8. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. 1978.
  9. J.H.Park, "comparative culture in psychology approach study on globalization". Yeungnam University Humanities Research, vol.27, 2001. pp.33-49.
  10. J.I.Choe, "the collective creativity of the determining factor in the study" in quotes (Parnes, S. J. 1977. "GPSI : The general System. 1995.
  11. J.K.Kim, "the personal characteristics and organization of the members of the creative act situation impact study", Seoul National University graduate, masters degree thesis. 1997.
  12. J.P.Guildford and W.S.Zimmerman, "The Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey." Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply. 1949.
  13. M. Csikszentmihalyi, " Creativity : Floe and and Psychology of Discovery and Invention", New York. Harper Collins. 1996.
  14. P. Suvagondh, Relationships among creative Style Preference, Job Satisfaction, and Work Environment. Alliant International U, San Diego, US. 2003.
  15. R.J.Sternberg and L. A. O'hara, "Creativity and Intelligence" in Sternberg: 1999. pp.251-272.
  16. R.M. Kanter, The Change master. New York:Simon & Schuster. 1983.
  17. R.R.McCrae and P.T. Costa, "Validation of the five-Factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers. " Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. vol. 52, 1987. pp. 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
  18. S.H.Lee and S.G.Kim & J.N.Choi, "Organization and personal nature of the Organization and its impact on the immersed", Korea administration a thesis vol.16. no. 4, 2004. pp.735-757.
  19. T.M.Amabile, "A Model of Cerativity and Innovation in Organization". In B. M Staw & L. L. Cummings(Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, 1998. pp.123-167.
  20. U.K.Lee, "domestic science and technology workforce creative research empowerment measures". 2003.
  21. U.S.Song and J.H.Kim, "the personal character of the intermediate-petty official and organization citizen behaviour of relationship : job autonomy of adjustment effects, mainly", Journal of political science, and vol.36. no. 1, 2002, pp.117-137.
  22. W.C.Borman and S.J.Motowidlo, "Expending the Criterion Domain to include elements of contextualPerformance." InN. Schmit & W.C. Bo rman (Ed s ), Personnel Selection in Organizations(pp.71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1993.
  23. W.T.Norman. "Toward an adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attribute: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Ratings." Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. vol.66, 1963. pp.574-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291