Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Designing of Metadata for Constructing the Library Map Information System

도서관지도정보시스템 구축을 위한 메타데이터 개발 연구

  • 노영희 (건국대학교 인문과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2010.08.14
  • Accepted : 2010.08.27
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to construct the Library Map Information System(LMIS) based on the Wiki theory of Web 2.0. We built this system because there was no collective source of information about every library in the world. Also, this system was developed to provide a library location information service by mashing-up with the Google Map. Through this study, the metadata applied to the newly constructed system was developed by using the Delphi method. A total of 13 experts including librarians of schools, public, academic, special, and national libraries as well as LIS faculty members and researchers, were commissioned as Delphi experts. Through three rounds of a Delphi survey analysis, the addition, modification, and deletion of the initial metadata elements was accomplished, and then the library contact/location information, library information, collection information, and event information was proposed. The metadata for LMIS was organized into four sectors and then 49 elements, each assigned to a sector.

세계에는 수많은 도서관이 있지만 어떤 시스템도 이 모든 도서관에 대한 정보를 총체적으로 제공하는 기관은 없다는 인식에서, 본 연구에서는 위키원리 기반 도서관지도정보시스템을 구축하고자 하였다. 또한 구글지도서비스를 매쉬업함으로써 도서관위치정보서비스도 제공하고자 하였다. 새로운 서비스 시스템이 개발됨에 따라, 이 시스템을 통해 제공될 정보의 효과적 조직 및 관리를 위해 새로운 메타데이터를 개발할 필요가 있었으며, 이를 위해 델파이 연구기법을 적용하였다. 델파이 전문위원으로 대학, 전문, 학교, 공공, 국가도서관의 사서를 포함하여 도서관 지도정보의 전문가인 연구소의 연구원 및 대학의 교수진 등 총 13명을 위촉하였다. 이들을 대상으로 한 제 3차에 걸친 델파이 설문분석과정을 통해, 초기 메타데이터 항목에 대한 추가, 수정, 삭제가 이루어졌으며, 도서관 위치정보, 도서관 정보, 장서정보, 행사정보로 구성된, 4개 부문 49개 항목의 메타데이터가 최종적으로 제안되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 건국대학교

References

  1. Fagan, J. C. 2006. “Usability testing of a large, multidisciplinary library database: Basic search and visual search.” Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3): 140-150. https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3345
  2. Quam, E. 2001. “Informing and evaluating a metadata initiative: Usability and metadata studies in Minnesota’s Foundations project.” Government Information Quarterly, 18(3): 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00075-2
  3. Walz, J., and B. Brenny. 2005. “Responding to diverse user groups: Usability testing of the web interface of the visual resources collection.” Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 31(2): 48-49.
  4. Wilson, A. J. 2007. “Toward releasing the metadata bottleneck: A baseline evaluation of contributor-supplied metadata.” Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(1): 16-28. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.51n1.16
  5. Wrubel, L. and K. Schmidt. 2007. “Usability testing of a metasearch interface: A case study.” College & Research Libraries, 68(4): 292-311. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.4.292
  6. Zhang, J. and I. Jastram. 2006. “A Study of the Metadata Creation Behavior of Different User Groups on the Internet.” Information Processing & Management, 42(4): 1099-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.05.002
  7. Zhang, J. and A. Dimitroff. 2004. “Internet search engines response to metadata Dublin Core implementation.” Journal of Information Science, 30(4): 311-321.
  8. Zhang, J. and A. Dimitroff. 2005a. “The impact of webpage content characteristics on the webpage visibility in search engine results(Part I).” Information Processing & Management, 41(3): 665-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.001
  9. Zhang, J. and A. Dimitroff. 2005b. “The impact of metadata implementation on the webpage visibility in search engine results(Part II).” Information Processing & Management, 41(3): 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.002

Cited by

  1. A Study on Measuring the Change of the Response Results in Likert 5-Point Scale Measurement vol.28, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.3.335