Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shoulder Prosthesis Mechanics

인공 견관절 역학

  • Jeong, Jin-Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • 정진영 (가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 정형외과)
  • Received : 2010.05.17
  • Accepted : 2010.06.16
  • Published : 2010.06.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of prosthetic replacement of the shoulder is the restoration of the normal anatomy of the joint. Materials and Methods: The physician should review the variations in normal anatomy because it does vary widely and the placement of the prosthetic needs to be modified to accommodate the variations. Results and Conclusion: Several factors including anatomic, prosthetic and surgical ones can lead to the best clinical results, and these are described.

목적: 견관절 인공관절 수술의 궁극적인 목표는 정상 견관절 해부학의 복원이다. 대상 및 방법: 견관절의 정상 해부학은 개인에 따라 다양하므로 수술 전 이를 정확하게 파약하여야 하며, 정상 해부학의 변이에 따라 인공관절 삽입물이 적절하게 변형되어 삽입되어야 한다. 결과 및 결론: 따라서 인공 견관절 치환술의 최선의 임상 결과를 위해 고려하여야 할 해부학적 요인, 인공 치환물의 요인, 수술 술기에 따른 요인에 대하여 알아 보고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C: Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 442: 121-130, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000195679.87258.6e
  2. Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP: Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 471-478, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010
  3. Delude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA: An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16: 477-483. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.016
  4. Harryman DT, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Lippitt SB, Matsen FA: The effect of articular conformity and the size of the humeral head component on laxity and motion after glenohumeral arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77: 555-563, 1995.
  5. Hertel R, Ballmer FT: Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 11: 331-338, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.124429
  6. Iannotti JP, Spencer EE, Winter U, Deffenbaugh D, Williams GR: Prosthetic positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 111S-121S, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.026
  7. Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, Evans B, Misra S: The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74: 491-500, 1997.
  8. Iannotti JP, Williams GR: Biomechanics of the glenohumeral joint: Influence on shoulder arthroplasty. In; Iannotti JP, Williams GR ed. Disorders of the shoulder: Diagnosis and management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 633-653, 2007.
  9. Jeong J, Bryan J, Iannotti JP: Effect of a variable neck-shaft angle and the surgical technique on replication of normal humeral anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg, 91: 1932-1941. 2009. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00729
  10. Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP: Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 85-90, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.04.011
  11. Nyffeler RW, Sheikh R, Jacob HAC, Gerber C: Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86: 575-580, 2004.
  12. Pearl ML: Proximal humeral anatomy in the shoulder arthroplasty: Implication for prosthetic design and surgical technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 99S-104S, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.025
  13. Pearl ML, Kurutz S: Geometric analysis of commonly used prosthetic systems for proximal humeral replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81: 660-671, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B4.9380
  14. Roche C, Angibaud L, Flurin PH, Wright T, Fulkerson E, Zuckerman J: Anatomic validation of an anatomic shoulder system. Bulletin of Hospital for Joint Diseases, 63: 93-97, 2006.
  15. Scalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP: Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional CT scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 328-335, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.013
  16. Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti J: The threedimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 487-491, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006
  17. Williams GR, Wong KL, Pepe MD, Tan V, Silverberg D, Ramsey ML, Karduna A, Iannotti JP: The effect of articular malposition after total shoulder arthroplasty on glenohumeral translation, range of motion, and subacromial impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 10: 399-409, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.116871
  18. Wirth MA, Ondrla J, Southworth C, Kaar K, Anderson BC, Rockwood CA: replicating proximal humeral articular geometry with a third-generation implant: A radiographic study in cadaveric shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 16: 111S-116S, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.008

Cited by

  1. Clinical Application of Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Shoulder Surgeries vol.1, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18204/JISSiS.2014.1.2.067