Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

INFLUENCE OF REBONDING PROCEDURES ON MICROLEAKAGE OF COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS

복합레진 수복 시 재접착 술식이 미세누출에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, Mi-Ae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Duck-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Son, Ho-Hyun (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Byeong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 이미애 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 서덕규 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 손호현 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조병훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Received : 2010.03.17
  • Accepted : 2010.04.16
  • Published : 2010.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

During a composite resin restoration, an anticipating contraction gap is usually tried to seal with low-viscosity resin after successive polishing, etching, rinsing and drying steps, which as a whole is called rebonding procedure. However, the gap might already have been filled with water or debris before applying the sealing resin. We hypothesized that microleakage would decrease if the rebonding agent was applied before the polishing step, i.e., immediately after curing composite resin. On the buccal and lingual surfaces of 35 extracted human molar teeth, class V cavities were prepared with the occlusal margin in enamel and the gingival margin in dentin. They were restored with a hybrid composite resin Z250 (3M ESPE, USA) using an adhesive AdperTM Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE). As rebonding agents, BisCover LV (Bisco, USA), ScotchBond Multi-Purpose adhesive (3M ESPE) and an experimental adhesive were applied on the restoration margins before polishing step or after successive polishing and etching steps. The infiltration depth of 2% methylene blue into the margin was measured using an optical stereomicroscope. The correlation between viscosity of rebonding agents and mciroleakage was also evaluated. There were no statistically significant differences in the microleakage within the rebonding procedures, within the rebonding agents, and within the margins. However, when the restorations were not rebonded, the microleakage at gingival margin was significantly higher than those groups rebonded with 3 agents (p < 0.05). The difference was not observed at the occlusal margin. No significant correlation was found between viscosity of rebonding agents and microleakage, except very weak correlation in case of rebonding after polishing and etching at gingival margin.

복합레진 수복시, 일반적으로 연마, 산부식, 수세 및 건조 단계를 거쳐 저점도 레진을 적용하는 재접착 술식을 통해 예상되는 수축간극을 봉쇄한다. 그러나, 이 과정은 재접착제 적용 이전에 물이나 잔사가 간극을 매워버릴 수 있어 그 효과가 의심된다. 본 실험에서는 연마 단계 이전, 즉 복합레진을 중합한 직후에 재접착제를 도포한다면 변연누출을 더 줄일 수 있을 것이라는 가설을 검증하고자 하였다. 실험을 위해 35개의 발거한 대구치에서 협면과 설면에 교합면 변연은 법랑질에, 치은측 변연은 상아질에 위치하는 5급 와동을 형성하였다. 와동은 Z250 (3M ESPE, USA)로 충전하였고, 접착제로는 $Adper^{TM}$ Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE)을 사용하였다. 재접착제로는 Biscover LV (Bisco, USA) 레진 전색제와 ScotchBond Multi-purpose system (3M ESPE)의 접착제, 및 점도가 낮은 실험용 접착제를 연마 전 또는 일련의 연마 및 산부식 후 수복물의 변연에 적용하였다. 2% 메틸렌 블루 용액에 네 시간 동안 침적한 뒤 교합측 및 치은측 변연에서의 색소 침투 깊이를 광학 입체 현미경으로 측정하였다. 재접착제의 점도와 변연미세누출의 상관관계도 평가하였다. 재접착 술식, 재접착제, 및 변연의 위치, 그 각각에서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 관찰할 수 없었다. 그러나, 재접착 술식을 시행하지 않은 대조군의 경우에는 세 가지 재접착제를 사용한 재접착군에 비해 치은측 변연에서 미세누출이 통계적으로 유의하게 크게 나타났다(p < 0.05). 대조군과 재접착군의 미세누출의 차이는 교합측 변연에서는 관찰되지 않았다. 연마 및 산부식 후 치은변연에 재접착제를 적용한 경우에서 약한 음의 상관관계(r = -0.326, p = 0.041)를 보인 경우를 제외하고는, 재접착제의 점도와 미세누출은 유의한 상관관계를 보이지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34(6):849-853, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  2. Burgess JO. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries. Am J Dent 8(6):342-351, 1995.
  3. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 123(7):53-58, 1992.
  4. Htang A, Ohsawa M, Matsumoto H. Fatigue resistance of composite restorations: effect of filler content. Dent Mater 11(1):7-13, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80002-6
  5. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 22(7):565-573, 1991.
  6. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 21(5):203-208, 1996.
  7. Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RG, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of Class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 25(5):448-453, 2000.
  8. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 22(4):295-298, 1991.
  9. Kubo S, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent 16(4):244-248, 2003.
  10. Torstenson B, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composites. Dent Mater 5(4):218-223, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90064-X
  11. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 158(11):410-414, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621
  12. Marais JT, Dannheimer MF, Germishuys PJ, Borman JW. Depth of cure of light-cured composite resin with light-curing units of different intensity. J Dent Assoc S Afr 52(6):403-407, 1997.
  13. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 23(3):183-189, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)93577-O
  14. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of a “resin coating”on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 28(1):28-35, 2003.
  15. Pameijer CH, Wendt SL, Jr. Microleakage of “surfacesealing” materials. Am J Dent 8(1):43-46, 1995.
  16. May KN, Jr., Swift EJ, Jr., Wilder AD, Jr., Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class Vrestorations. Am J Dent 9(3):133-136, 1996.
  17. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M, Mattsson B. A new method for sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities. J Dent Res 64(3):450-453, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640031201
  18. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G. Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 61(6):791-795, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610062801
  19. Koo BJ, Shin DH. The effect of C-factor and volume on microleakage of composite resin restorations with enamel margins. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31(6):452-459, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.6.452
  20. Judes H EI, Lieberman R, Serebro L Rebonding as a method of controlling marginal microleakage in composite resin restoration. NewYork Journal of Dentistry 52:137-143, 1982.
  21. Cho YG, Kim MH, Lee MG. Effect of resin sealants on the reduction of microleakage in composite restorations. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 31(4):282-289, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.282
  22. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 124(7):68-72, 1993. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0265
  23. Erhardt MC, Magalhaes CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent 27(4):396-402, 2002.
  24. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent 48(1):78-80, 2000.
  25. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 33(6):450-456, 2002.
  26. Prati C, Valdre G, Mongiorgi R, Bertocchi G, Savino A. Changes in enamel and dentin interface around composite class V restorations. J Dent Res 71:1014, 1992.
  27. Staninec M, Mochizuki A, Tanizaki K, Jukuda K, Tsuchitani Y. Interfacial space, marginal leakage, and enamel cracks around composite resins. Oper Dent 11(1):14-24, 1986.
  28. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 31(4):481-488, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-77
  29. Cho YG, Choi HY. Effect of BisconverTM on the marginal microleakage of composite resin restoration. J Kor Acad Cons Dent 30(5):355-362, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.355
  30. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 16(2):70-77, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81567-0
  31. Barone-Smith CE, Dickens SH. Effect of surface sealing on the microleakage of bonded restorations. J Dent Res 78:155 abst #394, 1999.
  32. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater 5(2):122-126, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90142-5
  33. Yu XY, Wieczkowski G, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Influence of finishing technique on microleakage. J Esthet Dent 2(5):142-144, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1990.tb00631.x
  34. Garcia-Godoy F, Malone WF. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations after rebonding. Compendium 8(8):606-609, 1987.

Cited by

  1. vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2014.39.1.32