DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Support Vector Method for the Deconvolution Problem

  • Received : 20100200
  • Accepted : 20100300
  • Published : 2010.05.31

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of nonparametric deconvolution density estimation when sample observa-tions are contaminated by double exponentially distributed errors. Three different deconvolution density estima-tors are introduced: a weighted kernel density estimator, a kernel density estimator based on the support vector regression method in a RKHS, and a classical kernel density estimator. The performance of these deconvolution density estimators is compared by means of a simulation study.

Keywords

References

  1. Carroll, R. J. and Hall, P. (1998). Optimal rates of convergence for deconvoluting a density, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1184-1886. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290153
  2. Fan, J. (1991). On the optimal rates of convergence for nonparametric deconvolution problem, Annals of Statistics, 19, 1257-1272. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176348248
  3. Gunn, S. R. (1998). Support Vector Machines for Classification and Regression, Technical report, University of Southampton.
  4. Hall, P. and Qiu, P. (2005). Discrete-transform approach to deconvolution problems, Biometrika, 92, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/92.1.135
  5. Hazelton, M. L. and Turlach, B. A. (2009). Nonparametric density deconvolution by weighted kernel estimators, Statistics and Computing, 19, 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-008-9086-7
  6. Lee, S. (2008). A note on nonparametric density estimation for the deconvolution problem, Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 15, 939-946. https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2008.15.6.939
  7. Lee, S. and Taylor, R. L. (2008). A note on support vector density estimation for the deconvolution problem, Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 37, 328–336.
  8. Liu, M. C. and Taylor, R. L. (1989). A Consistent nonparametric density estimator for the deconvolution problem, The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 17, 427-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/3315482
  9. Louis, T. A. (1991). Using empirical Bayes methods in biopharmaceutical research, Statistics in Medicine, 10, 811-827. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100604
  10. Mendelsohn, J. and Rice, R. (1982). Deconvolution of microfluorometric histograms with B splines, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 748-753. https://doi.org/10.2307/2287301
  11. Mukherjee, S. and Vapnik, V. (1999). Support vector method for multivariate density estimation, Proceedings in Neural Information Processing Systems, 659-665.
  12. Pensky, M. and Vidakovic, B. (1999). Adaptive wavelet estimator for nonparametric density deconvolutoin, Annals of Statistics, 27, 2033-2053. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1017939249
  13. Phillips, D. L. (1962). A technique for the numerical solution of integral equations of the first kind, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 9, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1145/321105.321114
  14. Stefanski, L. and Carroll, R. J. (1990). Deconvoluting kernel density estimators, Statistics, 21, 169-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331889008802238
  15. Zhang, H. P. (1992). On deconvolution using time of flight information in positron emission tomography, Statistica Sinica, 2, 553-575

Cited by

  1. A note on SVM estimators in RKHS for the deconvolution problem vol.23, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5351/CSAM.2016.23.1.071
  2. A Note on Deconvolution Estimators when Measurement Errors are Normal vol.19, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2012.19.4.517
  3. A note on nonparametric density deconvolution by weighted kernel estimators vol.25, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2014.25.4.951