Neurophysiology of the Sensory System and Clinical Applications

감각신경계의 신경생리와 임상적 이용

  • Seo, Dae-Won (Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Brain and Nerve Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 서대원 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 뇌신경센터 신경과)
  • Received : 2010.10.22
  • Accepted : 2010.10.31
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

Various electrophysiological tests have provided a large body of valuable information on neuronal responses to a presented stimulus. The special and general somatic sensory pathways are main targets of evoked potentials. Two types of evoked potentials, exogenous and endogenous, are commonly used. Exogenous evoked potentials of general and special somatic sensory systems will be reviewed. One of general somatic sensory functional pathways, proprioception, can be evaluated by general somatosensory evoked potentials with electrical stimulation on nerves. The special somatosensory functional pathways, including vision, and audition, can be evaluated by visual evoked potentials and auditory evoked potentials. Also laser-evoked potentials are newly developed for pain pathway, including lateral spinothalamic pathway, and vestibular myogenic evoked potentials for sacculocollic pathways. The evoked potentials of sensory system have maximal clinical utility in evaluating functional deficits along the sensory pathways. They are used for evaluating comatose patients, hysterical patients, premature infants, patients with suspected demyelinating diseases or neoplasms, and research. We discuss the neurophysiologic tests of sensory systems in views of practical points. The organized evaluation of sensory electrophysiologic tests can be helpful in detecting and estimating the abnormalities in neurological diseases.

Keywords

References

  1. Park KD, Seo DW. Evoked potentials. In: Park SH. Practical guidelines for clinical neurophysiology. Vol. 1. Seoul: The Korean Society for Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009;36-76.
  2. Toleikis JR, Carlvin AO, Shapiro DE, Schafer MF. The use of dermatomal evoked responses during surgical procedures that use intrapedicular fixation of the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:2401-2407. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199312000-00006
  3. Jones EG. Neurotransmitters in the cerebral cortex. J Neurosurg 1986;65:135-153. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1986.65.2.0135
  4. Benzon HT, Toleikis JR, Dixit P, Goodman I, Hill JA. Onset, intensity of blockade and somatosensory evoked potential changes of the lumbosacral dermatomes after epidural anesthesia with alkalinized lidocaine. Anesth Analg 1993;76:328-332.
  5. Society ACN. Guideline 9D: Guidelines on short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23:168-179. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-200604000-00013
  6. Medicine AAoE. Guidelines for somatosensory evoked potentials. Muscle Nerve Suppl 1999;8:S121-S138.
  7. Mauguiere F, Allison T, Babiloni C, Buchner H, Eisen AA, Goodin SJ, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Deuschl G, Eisen A. Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology: Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1999;79-90.
  8. Nelson FW, Grotta JC, Goldie WD. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in pure sensory stroke (PSS). Stroke 1986;17:778-779. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.17.4.778
  9. Merle PE, Joan N, Varnet O, Dupuy-Sonntag D, Perin B, Macron JM. Somatosensory evoked potentials for the diagnosis of proximal sensory median neuropathy with preserved distal sensory action potential. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2003;43:503-506.
  10. Aminoff MJ, Goodin DS. Visual evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:493-499. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199409000-00004
  11. Celesia GG. Steady-state and transient visual evoked potentials in clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1982;388:290-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb50797.x
  12. Cant BR, Hume AL, Shaw NA. Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978;45:496-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(78)90293-6
  13. Leocani L, Martinelli V, Natali-Sora MG, Rovaris M, Comi G. Somatosensory evoked potentials and sensory involvement in multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical findings and quantitative sensory tests. Mult Scler 2003;9:275-279. https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458503ms908oa
  14. Kuroiwa Y, Celesia GG. Visual evoked potentials with hemifield pattern stimulation. Their use in the diagnosis of retrochiasmatic lesions. Arch Neurol 1981;38:86-90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1981.00510020044005
  15. Tobimatsu S, Celesia GG. Studies of human visual pathophysiology with visual evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:1414-1433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.01.004
  16. Markand ON. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J Clin Neurophysiol 1994;11:319-342. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199405000-00004
  17. Stone JL, Calderon-Arnulphi M, Watson KS, Patel K, Mander NS, Suss N, et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials-a review and modified studies in healthy subjects. J Clin Neurophysiol 2009;26:167-175. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181a76a6e
  18. Wu CH, Young YH, Murofushi T. Tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials in human neck flexor and extensor. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:741-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489950180351
  19. Ferber-Viart C, Duclaux R, Colleaux B, Dubreuil C. Myogenic vestibular-evoked potentials in normal subjects: a comparison between responses obtained from sternomastoid and trapezius muscles. Acta Otolaryngol 1997;117:472-481. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489709113424
  20. Truini A, Romaniello A, Galeotti F, Iannetti GD, Cruccu G. Laser evoked potentials for assessing sensory neuropathy in human patients. Neurosci Lett 2004;361:25-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.008
  21. Truini A, Rossi P, Galeotti F, Romaniello A, Virtuoso M, De Lena C, et al. Excitability of the Adelta nociceptive pathways as assessed by the recovery cycle of laser evoked potentials in humans. Exp Brain Res 2004;155:120-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1785-x