DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of differentially expressed genes in the developmental stages from olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus using an annealing control primer system

  • Kim, Young-Ok (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Park, Eun-Mi (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Nam, Bo-Hye (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Kong, Hee-Jeong (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Jin (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Noh, Jae-Koo (Fish Genetics and Breeding Research Center, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jun (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Kil (Biotechnology Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute)
  • Received : 2009.10.12
  • Published : 2010.03.31

Abstract

We employed a new and improved differential display reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (DDRT-PCR) method, which involves annealing control primers (ACPs), to identify the genes that are specifically or prominently expressed in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) juveniles (35 days post-hatch; dph) compared to larval-stage (dph 21) flounder. Using 60 ACPs, we identified eight differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) searches revealed eight known genes. Gene expression levels were confirmed by RT-PCR. Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) was highly expressed at 21 dph, while nephrosin, myosin light chain (MLC), myosin heavy chain (MHC), carboxypeptidase A, chymotrypsin B, fish-egg protein, and matrix protein were expressed at 35 dph. PGI, MLC, and MHC expression was further analyzed by RT-PCR. The differentially expressed genes identified in this study may provide insights into the molecular basis of development in olive flounder.

Keywords

References

  1. Cao MJ, Osatomi K, Matsuda R, Ohkubo M, Hara K, Ishihara T. 2000. Purification of a novel serine proteinase inhibitor from skeletal muscle of white croaker (Argyrosomus argentatus). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 272:485-489. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.2803
  2. Chaput M, Claes V, Portetelle D, Cludts I, Cravador A, Burny A, Gras H, Tartar A. 1988. The neurotrophic factor neuroleukin is 90% homologous with phosphohexose isomerase. Nature. 332:454-455. https://doi.org/10.1038/332454a0
  3. Drasdo D, Forgacs G. 2000. Modeling the interplay of generic and genetic mechanisms in cleavage, blastulation, and gastrulation. Dev Dyn. 219:182-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0177(200010)219:2<182::AID-DVDY1040>3.3.CO;2-1
  4. Gauthier GF, Lowey S, Benfield PA, Hobbs AW. 1982. Distribution and properties of myosin isozymes in developing avian and mammalian skeletal muscle fibres. J Cell Biol. 92:471-484. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.92.2.471
  5. Harrison RA. 1974. The detection of hexokinase, glucosephosphate isomerase and phosphoglucomutase activities in polyacrylamide gels after electrophoresis: a novel method using immobilized glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Anal Biochem. 61:500-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(74)90417-5
  6. Hill JA, Kiessling A, Devlin RH. 2000. Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) transgenic for a growth hormone gene construct exhibit increased rates of muscle hyperplasia and detectable levels of differential gene expression. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 57:930-950.
  7. Hwang IT, Kim YJ, Kim SH, Kwak CI, Gu YY, Chun JY. 2003. Annealing control primer system for improving specificity of PCR amplification. Biotechniques. 35: 1180-1184.
  8. Izumo S, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V. 1986. All members of the MHC multigene family respond to thyroid hormone in a highly tissue-specific manner. Science. 231:597-600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3945800
  9. Jeffery CJ. 1999. Moonlighting proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 24:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(98)01335-8
  10. Kim YJ, Kwak CI, Gu YY, Hwang IT, Chun JY. 2004. Annealing control primer system for identification of differentially expressed genes on agarose gels. BioTechniques. 36:424-426.
  11. Kjorsvik E, Magnor-Jensen A, Holmefjord I. 1990. Egg quality in fishes. Adv Mar Biol. 26:71-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60199-6
  12. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M. 2001. MEGA2: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 12:1244-1245.
  13. Lowey S. 1994. The structure of vertebrate muscle myosin. In: Engel AG, Franzini-Armstrong C, editors. Myology. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 485-505.
  14. Nam BH, Moon JY, Kim YO, Kong HJ, Kim WJ, Lee SJ, Kim KK. 2010. Multiple beta-defensin isoforms identified in early developmental stages of the teleost Paralichthys olivaceus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 28:267- 274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2009.11.004
  15. Park EM, Kim YO, Nam BH, Kong HJ, Kim WJ, Lee SJ, Kim KK. 2009. Cloning and expression analysis of cathepsin D in the olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 73:1856-1859. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.80822
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406-425.
  17. Shields RJ. 2001. Larviculture of marine finfish in Europe. Aquaculture. 200:55-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00694-9
  18. Takeuchi T. 1998. Nutritional requirements of larval and juvenile Japanese flounder. Textbook of basic and theoretical course in sea farming-XII. (in Japanese) Tokyo: Fisheries Agency and JSFA. p. 1-23.
  19. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  20. Watanabe H, Takehana K, Date M, Shinozaki T, Raz A. 1996. Tumor cell autocrine motility factor is the neuroleukin/ phosphohexose isomerase polypeptide. Cancer Res. 56:2960-2963.
  21. Wen A, You F, Tan X, Sun P, Ni J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Wu Z, Xu Y, Zhang P. 2009. Expression pattern of dmrt4 from olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) in adult gonads and during embryogenesis. Fish Physiol Biochem. 35: 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-008-9267-5
  22. Whalen RG, Sell SM, Butler-Browne GS, Schwartz K, Bouveret P, Pinset-Harstrom I. 1981. Three myosin heavy chain isozymes appear sequentially in rat muscle development. Nature. 292:805-809. https://doi.org/10.1038/292805a0
  23. Wieser W. 1995. Energetics of fish larvae, the smallest vertebrates. Acta Physiol Scand. 154:279-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09912.x
  24. Xu W, Seiter K, Feldman E, Ahmed T, Chiao JW. 1996. The differentiation and maturation mediator for human myeloid leukemia cells shares homology with neuroleukin or phosphoglucose isomerase. Blood. 87:4502-4506.
  25. Yakirevich E, Naot Y. 2000. Cloning of a glucose phosphate isomerase/neuroleukin-like sperm antigen involved in sperm agglutination. Biol Reprod. 62:1016-1023. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.4.1016
  26. Yamano K, Takano-Ohmuro H, Obinata T, Inui Y. 1994. Effect of thyroid hormone on developmental transition of myosin light chains during flounder metamorphosis. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 93:321-326. https://doi.org/10.1006/gcen.1994.1036