소아약증직결(小兒藥證直訣)과 비위론(脾胃論)에 기재된 용어 비교에 관한 연구

The Comparative Study of the Nominal Terms between "Biwiron(脾胃論)" and "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)"

  • 김민건 (대구한의대학교 한의과대학 원전의사학교실) ;
  • 이병욱 (부산대학교 한의학전문대학원 인문사회의학부) ;
  • 김은하 (대구한의대학교 한의과대학 원전의사학교실)
  • Kim, Min-Gun (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics and History, Daegu Haany University) ;
  • Lee, Byung-Wook (Division of Humanities and Social Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Ha (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics and History, Daegu Haany University)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.18
  • 심사 : 2010.01.12
  • 발행 : 2010.01.25

초록

Objective : We did a comparative study about characteristics of oriental medical books. As a result, we took notice of classification in the nominal terms by semantic type of UMLS(Unified Medical Language System). By using classified nominal terms, comparative study can be more effectively. So, we selected another oriental medical book and classified nominal terms in it by semantic type of UMLS. By result of classification, we have attempted to study about comparison between oriental medical books and development of medical theories. Method :We have made a comparative study on classification in the nominal terms between "Biwiron(脾胃論)" and "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)" according to the below the procedure. (1) Making a nominal terms list of "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)" and grasping contextual meaning of nominal terms of it. (2) Modification and supplementation about semantic type of UMLS for "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)". Using the modified classification system, we classified nominal terms. After this process, we arranged classified nominal terms by Haansoft Hangul 2007. (3) Comparing classified nominal terms between "Biwiron(脾胃論)" and "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)". Result : In the "Soayakjeungjikgyeol(小兒藥證直訣)", there are more than 2,519's nominal terms and different categories of semantic type of UMLS classification from "Biwiron(脾胃論)". Through comparison between their classification of nominal terms, we can understand the characteristics of the two and their development of medical theories.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 정두영, 이병욱, 엄동명, 김은하. 脾胃論에 기재된 용어 분류체계에 관한 연구. 대한한의학원전학회지. 2009. 22(1). pp.191-205.
  2. 朴宣柱. 小兒科學의 變遷(兩宋-明代)에 關한 硏究. 동국대학교 대학원 한의학과. 2006. p.10.
  3. 吳晙煥. 錢乙의 醫學思想에 關한 硏究. 동국대학교 대학원. 2000. p.41.
  4. 李勳. 中國 小兒科學의 史的 考察. 경희대학교 대학원. 1999. pp.25-26.
  5. 崔僖允. 李東垣의 脾胃論에 대한 硏究. 대구한의 대학교 대학원. 2009. p.1, 68.
  6. 錢乙. 小兒藥證直訣. 서울. 여강출판사. 2002. p.5.
  7. 錢乙. 小兒藥證直訣. 서울. 醫聖堂. 1994. pp.1-198.
  8. 陳大舜, 曾勇, 黃政德. 各家學說中國篇. 경기도. 대성의학사. 2004. p.127, 128, 162, pp.151-152, 498-500.
  9. 尹暢烈 編譯. 韓中醫學各家學說. 주민출판사. 2006. p.324. pp.214-216, 219-222,
  10. 大田大學校 第五期卒業準備委員會. 東垣脾胃論譯釋. 서울. 대성문화사. 1994. p.245, 267.
  11. 金德坤, 金允姬, 金璋顯, 朴恩貞, 白政翰, 李承蓮, 李進容, 張奎台 編著. 東醫 小兒科學. 서울. 도서출판 정담. 2002. p.22.
  12. 洪元植. 中國醫學史. 서울. 동양의학연구소. 1993. p.169, 215.
  13. http://164.125.206.43/SoA