Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Selection of Roof Waterproofing Methods using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Technique

AHP 기법을 활용한 지붕방수공법 선정에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2010.06.30
  • Accepted : 2010.07.23
  • Published : 2010.08.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a decision-making technique for selecting waterproofing methods using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. In this study, a questionnaire survey was given to a group of specialists, which included design specialists, construction specialists, and maintenance specialists, regarding their experience with roof waterproofing methods. The 1st level hierarchy of the questionnaire survey addressed the function, economics, and maintenance of each of the roof waterproofing methods. The rank of 13 items of questionnaire, which is the 2nd level hierarchy of the questionnaire survey, is calculated using Expert Choice Solution. The analysis of questionnaire survey shows that each specialist selects different roof waterproofing methods, and all specialists make much of waterproof performance.

본 연구는 지붕방수공법 선정에 계층분석기법을 적용하여 의사 결정하는 과정을 제안하는 것이 목적이다. 지붕방수공법에 대한 경험에 대하여 본 연구에서 설계 전문가, 시공 전문가, 그리고 유지관리 전문가 그룹에 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사의 첫 번째 계층은 성능, 경제적, 그리고 유리관리 측면으로 구성하였고, 설문의 두 번째 계층은 13개 항목으로 구성하여 Expert Choice를 이용하여 순위를 계산하였다. 설문 분석결과 각 전문가들은 다른 선택을 하였는데, 모든 분야의 전문가는 방수성능 측면을 가장 중요시 하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim BS, Lee YS, Hong JS, Kim JJ. Development of the strategy for construction production improvement by system thinking. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008;9(6):156-163.
  2. Choi SM, Oh SK, Seo CH. A study on the weight decision and decision-making process for selection system of waterproofing methods of structure roof. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2009;25(1):157-166.
  3. Yang KY, Yoon YW. A study on the selection of construction method by decision making method. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2002;2(1):147-154. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2002.2.1.147
  4. Yoon HB, Kim SJ, Lee CS. Maintenance performance improvement method of the buildings in design phase. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2006:692-697.
  5. Korea institute of construction technology, Selection of waterproofing and construction management skills.
  6. Choi OY, Kim TH, Kim GH. A study on selection of roof waterproofing method by analyzing Life Cycle Costing. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2008;8(5):127-134. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2008.8.5.127
  7. Kim JY, Kim GH, Ahn SH, Lee JY. Benefit/cost analysis of Form work methods for composite basement wall in Building constructions. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2008;8(1):99-104.
  8. Kim JI, Koo KJ, Park SC, Park HJ. Building finishing materials selecting supporting model using CBR and AHP. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2008;28(1):589-592.
  9. Lee CH, Jeong KC. Selecting a foundation practice using analytic hierarchy process and utility theory. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2009:189-194.
  10. Lee SB, Pyo YM. A study on the analysis of factors decreasing construction labor-productivity using AHP method. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2007;9(1):179-187.
  11. Chung JY, Yoon TK. A study on the equilibrium-pricing mechanism of apartment. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2008;8(6):65-74. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2008.8.6.065
  12. Kim MJ, Lee JS. Methods for decision making model in apartment development projects using on analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2008;9(5):95-103.
  13. Jung IS, Lee CS. Alternative evaluation model in the development of environment-friendly residential land. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2009;10(1):156-166.
  14. Jang RW, Yoo BG, Lee YS, Kim JJ. A study on the analyzing risk factors in chinese construction projects using AHP. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2009;25(7):287-294.
  15. Choi SM, Lim JK, Oh SK, Seo hH. A research for weight decision of waterproofing methods selection evaluation item using the AHP. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2008;8(2):205-211.
  16. Choi SM, Oh SK, Seo CH. A study on the weight decision and risk abstraction for Life Cycle Cost analysis of the waterproofing methods in structure roof which considers a risk probability. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2009;5(4):177-184.
  17. Cho GT, Cho YG, Kang HS. AHP decision making. Dong Hyun Publishing Co. Ltd. 2003.
  18. Harker PT, Vargas LG, The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science. 1987;33[11]:1383-1403. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383
  19. Satty TL, The analytic hierarchy process. The McGraw-Hill Companies. 1980.
  20. Satty TL, Vargas LG, method, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston ;Kluwer Academic Publisher. 2001.
  21. Igal M, Shohet M. Puterman Flat roofing systems: Towards integrated techno-economic analysis. Building Research & Information. 2004;32[2]:165-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000172391

Cited by

  1. Decision-making Reliability Estimation Model based on Building Construction Project Participants' Experience vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2013.13.2.148
  2. The Study on the Development of Automatic Rebar Placement System Applying Selection Method of Optimum Reinforcing Bar Group on Shear Wall vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.1.081