Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회논문집)

Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea (한국지진공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inelastic Displacement Ratio for Strength-limited Bilinear SDF Systems

강도한계 이선형 단자유도 시스템의 비탄성 변위비

  • Received : 2010.04.14
  • Accepted : 2010.05.14
  • Published : 2010.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of vibration, level of lateral yielding strength, site conditions, ductility factor, strain-hardening ratio, and post-capping ratio of the strength limited bilinear SDF systems on the inelastic displacement ratio. The nonlinear response history analysis was conducted using 240 ground motions which were collected at the sites classified as site classes B, C, and D according to the NEHRP. To account for the P-$\Delta$ effects, this study considered negative stiffness ratios ranging from -0.1 to -0.5 of elastic stiffness. Four different damping ratios are used: 2, 5, 10, and 20%. From this study, an equation of inelastic displacement ratio was proposed using nonlinear regression analysis.

본 연구는 철골 모멘트 골조의 이력거동을 잘 나타내는 강도한계 이선형 단자유도 시스템에 대하여 지반조건, 후탄성 기울기, 감쇠비, 항복강도 저감계수, 고유주기 등의 변화가 비탄성변위비에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. NEHRP의 기준에 따라 B(보통암지반), C(매우 조밀한 토사지반), D(단단한 토사지반)의 지반조건에 해당하는 총 240개의 지진 가속도에 대하여 비선형 시간이력 해석을 수행하였다. 본 연구에서는 비탄성 거동 하에서 P-$\Delta$ 효과를 반영할 수 있도록 음강성비를 -0.1 에서 -0.5까지 고려하였다. 비선형 회귀분석을 통하여 감쇠비 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%에 대한 강도한계 이선형 모델의 비탄성 변위비와 로그표준편차식을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Federal Emergency Management Agency.(FEMA), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA-356, 2000.
  2. Applied Technology Council, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Report ATC-40, Redwood City, Calif, 1996.
  3. Federal Emergency Management Agency.(FEMA), Assessment of Improved Nonlinear Static seismic analysis procedures, Report FEMA-440, Washington, D.C. 2005.
  4. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, “Effect of inelastic behavior on the response of simple systems to earthquake motions,” Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Japan, Vol. 2, 895-912, 1960.
  5. Oscar M.Ramirez et al, “Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems,” Earthquake Spectra, 18(3): 531-547, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1509762
  6. Chopra, A.K., and Chintanapakdee, C., “Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluation of structures : single degree of freedom bilinear systems,” Report No. EERC 2003-09, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of Calif. at Berkeley, CA, 2003.
  7. Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E, “Inelastic displaceme nt ratios for evaluation of existing structures,” Earthauake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(8): 1237-1258, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.271
  8. Ibarra, L. F., and Krawinkler, H., “Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations,” Report TR-152, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, CA, 2005.
  9. Han, S.W., Chopra A.K., “Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics; l35:1853-1873, 2006.
  10. Ruiz-Garcia, J., and Miranda, E, “Probabilis tic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performacebased design,” Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn,;36:1235-1254, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.680
  11. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 3rd Edition, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 2007.