Success and Failure of Surgical Endodontic Treatment in Molar Teeth

  • Geum, Yun-Seon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Livingwell Dental Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jang-Ryeol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Livingwell Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Livingwell Dental Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Cheol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Livingwell Dental Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yeong-Uk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Livingwell Dental Hospital)
  • Received : 2010.11.04
  • Accepted : 2010.11.29
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Despite the latest advancement made in its techniques and devices/apparatuses and the resulting rising expectation in the field of dental surgery, apicoectomy performed in the molar teeth remains a technical challenge and lacks evidence substantiated by long-term follow-up studies. This study sought to investigate the treatment outcomes and post-operative success rate in the root-end resected molar teeth accompanied by a high level of surgical risks due to their close proximity to the mandibular canal and maxillary sinus. A total of 68 patients who received treatment at Livingwell Dental Hospital between 2004 and 2010 and underwent apical surgery in the maxillary or mandibular molar area were enrolled in this study. A total of 160 roots collected from 75 molar teeth were subjected to surgical endodontic treatment and subsequently evaluated clinically as well as radiographically. Based on the results of the study, the clinical success rate was found to be 78.8% in cases involving radiological healing. Likewise, 90.7% of the roots recorded a robust clinical survival rate, but with incomplete healing as shown by radiography. The results indicate that the apical procedure involving molar teeth is a prognosis-friendly method that promises positive outcomes and higher success rate based on long-term follow-up observations.

Keywords

References

  1. Freedman A, Horowitz I. Complications after apicoectomy in maxillary premolar and molar teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80136-2
  2. Harry FJ, Parkins BJ, Wengraf AM. The success rate of apicectomy: a retrospective study of 1,016 cases. Br Dent J. 1970;129:407-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802595
  3. Rud J, Andreasen JO, Jensen JEM. A follow-up study of 1,000 cases treated by endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1:215- 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(72)80014-0
  4. Mikkonen M, Kullaa-Mikkonen A, Kotilainen R. Clinical and radiologic reexamination of apicoectomized teeth. Oral Surg. 1983;55:302-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90332-8
  5. Persson G, Lennartson B, Lundstrom I. Results of retrograde rootfilling with special reference to amalgam and cavit as root-filling materials. Svensk. Tandlak Tidskr. 1974;68:123-33.
  6. Nordenram A, Svardstrom G. Results of apicectomy: a clinicalradiological examination. Svensk. Tandlak Tidskr. 1970;63:593- 604.
  7. Hirsch JM, Ahlstrom U, Henrikson PA, Heyden G, Peterson, LE. Periapical surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1979;8:173-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(79)80016-2
  8. Mattila K, Altonen M. A clinical and roentgenological study of apicoectomized teeth. Odontol. Tidskr. 1968;76:389-407.
  9. von Arx T. Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic inspection during periradicular surgery. Int Endod J. 2005;38:160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00915.x
  10. von Arx T, Walker W. Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000;16:47-62. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016002047.x
  11. Penarrocha M, Sanchis JM, Gay C. Cirugia periapical con tecnica de ultrasonidos y relleno con amalgama de plata: a proposito de 122 casos. Rev Eur Odont Estomatol. 2001;13:181-8.
  12. Penarrocha M, Sanchis JM, Gay C. Periapical surgery of 31 lower molars based on the ultrasound technique and retrograde filling with silver amalgam. Med Oral 2001;6:376-82.
  13. Littner MM, Kaffe I, Tamse A, et al. Relationship between the apices of the lower molars and mandibular canal a radiographic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62:595. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(86)90326-9
  14. Rud J, Rud V, Munksgaard EC. Periapical healing of mandibular molars after root-end sealing with dentine-bonded composite. Int Endod J. 2001;34:285. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00383.x
  15. Altonen M. Transantral subperiosteal resection of the palatal root of maxillary molars. Int J Oral Surg. 1975;4:277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(75)80045-7
  16. Persson G. Periapical surgery of molars. Int J Oral Surg. 1982;11:96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80016-1
  17. Wallace JA. Transantral endodontic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1996;82:80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80381-7
  18. von Arx T, Gerber C, Hardt N. Periradicular surgery of molars: a prospective clinical study with a one-year follow-up. Int J Endod. 2001;34:520. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00427.x
  19. Garcia B, Martorell L, Marti E, et al. Periapical surgery of maxillary posterior teeth: a review of the literature. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Buccal. 2006;11:E146.
  20. Oberli K, Bornstein MM, von Arx T. Periapical surgery and the maxillary sinus: radiographic parameters for clinical outcome. Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.09.017
  21. Wesson CM, Gale TM. Molar apicectomy with amalgam rootend filling: results of a prospective study in two district general hospitals. Br Dent J. 2003;195:707. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810834
  22. Friedman S, Lustmann J, Shaharabany V. Treatment results of apical surgery in premolar and molar teeth. J Endod. 1991;17:30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80158-0
  23. Ioannides C, Borstlap WA. Apicoectomy on molars: a clinical and radiographical study. Int J Oral Surg. 1983;12:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(83)80001-5
  24. Franz M, Bethke K, Bier J. Wurzelspitzenamputation an 150 molaren des oberund unterkiefers. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1987;42:287-9.
  25. Penarrocha M. Protocolo en cirugia endodontica. Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Buccal. 2004;61.
  26. Rud J, Andreasen JO, Jensen JEM. Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1:195-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(72)80013-9
  27. von Arx T, Kurt B. Root-end cavity preparation after apicoectomy using a new type of sonic and diamond-surfaced retrotip: a 1-year follow-up study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90424-X
  28. Gay C, Paredes J, Berini L. La cirugia periapical en los molares. Rev Eur Odont Estomatol. 1993;2:95-102.
  29. Testori T, Capelli M, Milani S, et al. Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1999;87:493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70250-7
  30. Zuolo M, Ferreira M, Gutmann J. Prognosis in periradicular surgery: a clinical prospective study. Int Endod J. 2000;33:91. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00263.x
  31. Rud J, Rud V, Munksgaard EC. Periapical healing of mandibular molars after root-end sealing with dentine-bonded composite. Int Endod J. 2001;34:285. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00383.x
  32. Rud J, Andreasen JO. A study of failures after endodontic surgery by radiographic, histological, and stereomicroscopic methods. Int J Oral Surg. 1972;1:311-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(72)80052-8
  33. Friedman S. The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgery. Endod Topics. 2005;11:219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00187.x
  34. von Arx T, Jensen SS, Hanni S. Clinical and radiographic assessment of various predictors for healing outcome 1 year after periapical surgery. J Endod. 2007;33:123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.10.001
  35. Garcia, et al. Periapical surgery in maxillary premolars and molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(6):1212-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.015
  36. Marti E, et al. Distance between periapical lesion and mandibular canal as a factor in periapical surgery in mandibular molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(12):241-6.
  37. Cotti E, Vargiu P, Dettori C, Mallarini G. Computed tomography in the management and follow-up of extensive periapical lesion. Endod. Dent. Traumatol. 1999;15:186-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00799.x
  38. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2001;92:682-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.118904