DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Winter Cover Crop-Minor Cereal Cropping System on Weed Occurrences and Crop Growth

잡곡-피복작물 작부체계에서 잡초 발생과 작물 생장

  • Received : 2010.08.26
  • Accepted : 2010.09.13
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the weed suppressing effects of two winter cover crops, Chinese milk vetch (CMV) and rye, in minor cereal fields in 2009. The suppressing activities of cover crops were due to the allelopathy of cover crops during weed emerging periods and competitive activity during vegetative growth of weeds. Weed suppression by cover crops were changed from 26.5 g $m^{-2}$, 0.1 g $m^{-2}$ and 0.2 g $m^{-2}$ in control, rye field and CMV field, respectively, on June 22 to 428.6 g $m^{-2}$, 1 g $m^{-2}$ and 403.9 g $m^{-2}$ in control, rye field and CMV field, respectively, on July 22. The weed dry weights were further changed to 656.3 g $m^{-2}$, 607.8 g $m^{-2}$ and 511.8 g $m^{-2}$ in control, rye field and CMV field, respectively, on August 22. The suppressing effect of cover crops also observed in minor cereals. Plant height and dry weight of sorghum was reduced to 68.7% and 33.6% of handweeding, respectively, on August 5. The reduction was recovered to 82.7% and 55.6% of control, respectively, on August 26. In addition, heading date of minor cereals was delayed by 7 days with rye.

피복작물을 이용한 잡초 방제효과와 녹비효과를 비교 분석하여 효과적인 피복작물-잡곡 작부체계를 알아보기 위한 호밀과 자운영을 이용하여 포장시험을 수행한 결과는 다음과 같다. 피복작물의 잡초 방제효과는 잡초의 발아억제와 생육저해로 잡곡 초기생장에 있어 잡초발생시기를 늦추었다. 그러나 잡초 방제기간이 자운영은 30일 내외, 호밀은 40일 내외로 자운영보다 호밀의 잡초방제 효과가 뛰어난 것으로 나타났다. 무처리구와 자운영 피복구는 잡곡의 출수기 차이는 나타나지 않았으나, 호밀의 피복구에서는 7일 정도 지연되었다. 피복작물에 대한 기장의 초장은 30%, 건물중은 70% 이상의 피해를 받았고, 조의 초장은 25%, 건물중은 60% 이상의 피해를 보였다. 그러나 시간이 경과함에 따라 조, 기장, 수수 모두 많은 회복을 보였으며, 특히 수수에서는 초장은 거의 회복되었으며, 건물중도 56% 까지 회복하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립식량과학원. 2009a. 한국잡곡산업 발전방안 워크숍. 농촌진흥청.
  2. 국립식량과학원. 2009b. 잡곡의 문화와 정보. 농촌진흥청.
  3. 채제천, 박순직, 강병화, 김석현. 2007. 재배학원론, 향문사, 서울. 122-362.
  4. Ateh M. C, and J. D. Doll. 1996. Spring-planted winter rye (Secale cereale) as a living mulch to control weeds in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 10:347-353.
  5. Barnes J. P., A. R. Putnam, B. A. Burke and A. J. Aasen. 1987. Isolation and characterization of alielochemicals in rye herbage. Phytochemistry 26:1385-1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)81818-X
  6. Dhima K. V., and I. B. Vasilakogloub. 2006. Allclopathic potential of winter cereal cover crop mulches on grass weed suppression and sugarbeet development. Crop Sci. 46:1682-1691. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0311
  7. Evans J. R., and I. Terashima. 1987. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on electron transport components and photosynthesis in spinach. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 14:281-292.
  8. Hall M. R., C. J. Swanton and G. W. Anderson, 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain com. Weed Sci. 40:441-447.
  9. Johnson G. A., and M. S. Defelice. 1993. Cover crop management and weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Techl. 7:425-430.
  10. Khanh D. T., M. I. Chung, T. D. Xuan and S. Tawata. 2005. The exploitation of crop allelopathy in sustainable agricultural production. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191:172-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00172.x
  11. Knezevic S. Z., S. F. Weise and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amarantliiis retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42: 568-573.
  12. Kobayashi H., S. Miura and A. Oyanagi. 2004. Effects of winter barley as a cover crop on the weed vegetation in a no-tillage soybean. Weed Biol. Manage. 4:195-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2004.00138.x
  13. Kropff M. J., and H. Walter. 2000. EWRS and the challenges for weed research at the start of a new millennium. Weed Res. 40:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00166.x
  14. Liebl R., F. W. Simmons, L. M. Wax and E. W. Stoller. 1992. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 6:838-846.
  15. Moore M. J., T. J. Gillespie and C. J. Swanton. 1994. Effect of cover crop mulches on weed emergence, weed biomass, and soybean (Glycine max) development. Weed Tech. 8:512-518.
  16. Nagabhushana G. G., A. D. Worsham and J. P. Yenish. 2001. Allelopathic cover crops to reduce herbicide use in sustainable agricultural systems. Allelopathy J. 8:133-146.
  17. Petersen J., and A. Rover. 2005. Comparison of sugar beet cropping systems with dead and living mulch using a glyphosate-resistant hybrid. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191:55-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2004.00134.x
  18. Putnam A. R., and J. DeFrank. 1983. Use of phyto-toxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Prot. 2:173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(83)90042-X
  19. Reddy K. N. 2001. Effects of cereal and legume cover crop residues on weeds, yield, and net return in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 15:660-668. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0660:EOCALC]2.0.CO;2
  20. Richard G., J. Boiffin and Y. Duval. 1995. Direct drilling of sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris) into a cover crop effects on soil physical conditions and crop establishment. Soil Till. Res. 34:169-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-1987(95)00464-4
  21. Shilling D. G., R. A. Liebl and A. D. Worsham. 1985. Rye and wheat mulch : The suppression of certain broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. p. 243-271. In A. C. Thompson (ed.) The chemistry of allelopathy : Biochemical interactions among plants. Am. Chem. Soc, Washington, DC.
  22. Van Acker R. C, C. J. Swanton and S. F. Weise. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Weed Sci. 41:194-200.
  23. Whiworth J. H. 1995. The ability of some cover crops to suppress common weeds of strawberry fields. J. Sustain. Agric. 7:137-145.
  24. Yenish J. P., A. D. Worsham and W. S. Chilton. 1995. Disappearance of DIBOA-glucoside, DIBOA, and BOA from rye (Secale cereal L.) cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 43:18-20.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Cover Crops and Sowing Methods on Weed Occurrences and Growth and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) vol.32, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2012.32.2.107
  2. Effects of Cover Crops and Sowing Methods on Weed Occurrences, Growth and Yield in Foxtail Millet Fields vol.57, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7740/kjcs.2012.57.4.337