Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지

Case Analysis of Risk Assessment for Steel and Iron Works

제철 사업장 위험성평가 사례 분석

  • Hong, Sung-Man (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Peom (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Hyoun (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University)
  • Received : 2009.09.30
  • Accepted : 2009.12.13
  • Published : 2010.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the steel industry, steel is manufactured and processed to produce a variety of steel products. The industry provides fundamental materials to the whole range of industries including car, ship, electric appliance and construction industries, so that it is very important as an infrastructure industry. The steel manufacture process involves aerial work, many danger factors caused by the treatment with hazardous gases including BFG and COG and by high pressure gases including $H_2$, $O_2$, $N_2$ and LPG. It requires the management over the large area because many workers work in a plant. The potential dangers in the steel plant were identified and the effect of the danger assessment was verified through the analysis of the danger assessment for the steel plant. The allowed degree of danger was lowered after the improvement through the danger assessment in the plant where the case studies were conducted, which indicates that the danger assessment is highly effective.

Keywords

References

  1. Bertera RL., "Planning and Implementing Health Promotion in the Workplace - A case study of Dupont Company Experience" Health Education Quarterly, vol. 17(3), pp. 307-327, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819001700307
  2. Bird, F.E. and Germain., "G.L. Damage Control", New York: Am. Mbmt Ass, 1966.
  3. Curtis S., "Safety & Total Quality Management", Professional Safety, Vol. 40, No.1, American Society of Safety Engineer. 1995.
  4. Frank P. Lees., "Loss Prevention in the Process Industries", Butterworth & Co. Ltd, 1980.
  5. Giby Joseph, Mark Kaszniak, Lisa Long, "Lessons after Bhopal: CSB a Catalyst for Charge", Journal of Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 18. pp. 537-548, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.07.009
  6. H.W. Heinrich., "Industrial Accident Prevent", Macgraw-Hill, New York, 1931.
  7. Hany H. Harman., "Morden Factor Analysis", The University of Chicago Press, chap. 4, 1976.
  8. HSE., "Successful Health & Safety Management", Health & Safety Executive, HMSO, London. 1991.
  9. Parker. R, H J. Otway, H. T. Knight, "The Flix borough Disaster", Report of the Court of Inquire, HM Stationery Office, London, 1975.
  10. Perkins. R., "Education and Alaskan Marin Safety Training Program" Public Health Report, vol. 110(6), pp. 701-703, 1998.
  11. Rasmussen, J., "Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modeling Problem", Safety Science, Vo127, PP183-213, 1997.
  12. Rasmussen, J., Klein, G., Orasanu, R., "Decision: Making in Action: Models and Mathods", Norwood, pp.158-171, 1993.
  13. Reason, J., "Human Error", Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University, 1990.
  14. Reason, J., "Errors, Outcoms and Circumvention: a Reply to Dougherty", Reliability Engineering and System Safety Vol.46, pp297-298, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(94)90127-9
  15. Reason, J.T., "Lapses of attention", In R. Parasuraman & R. Davis (eds.), Varieties of atten tion, New York: Academic Press, 1984.
  16. 김철식, 송철기, "산업재해분석을 통한 안전교육훈련의 개서에 관한 연구", 공학교육연구, 제6권 제2호, pp. 15-21, 2003.
  17. 백승현, "석유화학 공장에 적합한 준-정량적 위험성평가(S-HAZOP) 기법 개발" 서울대학교 산업대학원 석사학위 논문, pp.22-36, 2007.
  18. 유진환, "위험성 평가 및 도면관리 시스템에 기반한 변경관리에 관한 연구", 광운대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문, p. 6, 2005.
  19. 이관형, 박동하, "안전효능감과 산업재해 관계분석", 산업안전학회지 제14권 제2호, pp. 127-139, 1999.6.
  20. 이명선, 박경옥, 이관형, "산업장 안전보건관리요건", 한국보건교육건강증진학회지, 제23권 제2호, pp. 121-140, 2006.
  21. 지화승, "한국 산업안전보건교육의 실효성 제고에 관한 연구", 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 2005.
  22. 한국산업안전보건공단, "KOREA CODE M-62-2008", 2008.