Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지

Comparisons of Classification System of Biotope Type in Major Korean Cities

국내 주요 도시의 비오톱유형 분류체계 비교

  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The classification of biotope type in major Korean cities was made based on the land use concept rather than the ecological concept of the land as the habitat of biological communities. Therefore, biotope type need to be reclassified according to ecological concerns and regional characteristics. This study attempts to clearly define various critical concepts regarding the classification of biotope type, such as classification hierarchy, classification criteria, classification factor, classification indicator, classification key, and classification standard. Furthermore, it also attempts to suggest the ways to improve the classification system of biotope type by sampling the cases of major Korean cities. The classification system of biotope type is required to have a coherent system that provides basic guidelines, standards and hierarchy with regard to biotic, abiotic and anthropotic factors, as well as classification indicators and classification keys.

국내 주요 도시에서 수행된 비오톱유형 분류는 생물서식처 관점보다는 토지이용 개념에 한정되어 분류되었고, 생태적 가치에 따라 상세하게 분류되지 못하였다. 비오톱유형은 지역적 특성을 고려하여 생물서식처 관점에 따라 분류되어야 한다. 본 논문은 비오톱유형 분류에 사용되는 분류위계, 분류항목, 분류요인, 분류지표, 분류기준, 분류key 등 분류인자의 개념적 틀을 명확하게 설정하고 사례도시의 비오톱유형 분류결과에 적용하여 문제점을 고찰하고 비오톱유형 분류체계 개선방향을 제안하였다. 비오톱유형 분류체계는 위계별로 분류의 기본 수준과 기준을 마련하여 일관된 분류 특성을 가져야 한다. 분류지표는 생물적 요인, 무생물적 요인, 인간행태적 요인을 고려하여 적용되어야 한다. 비오톱유형은 일반인들과 계획가들이 이해하기 쉽도록 분류지표와 분류key의 표준화와 더불어 지역 비오톱 특성을 반영할 수 있도록 분류key와 분류기준의 특성화를 반영하는 것이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blab, J., U. Riecken and A. Ssymank(1995) Proposal on a criteria system for a National Red Data Book of Biotopes. Landscape Ecology 10(1): 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158552
  2. Choi, I.K., C.H. Oh and E.H. Lee(2008) The suggestion for classification of biotope type for nationwide application. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 22(6): 666-678.
  3. Choi, J.W.(2009) Development of classification and evaluation process of biotope type by suitable regional characteristics in Seoul metropolitan area, Korea. University of Seoul graduate school dissertation for the degree of doctor, 306pp.
  4. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation(2002) A system for the survey of biotope and land use types(survey guide). LV Druck, Munster, Germany, 166pp.
  5. Goyang City(2008) A Study on the ecological urban establishment and biotope map. Korea, 501pp.
  6. Gwangyang City(2006) Biotope map and its data base. Korea, 286pp.
  7. Hong, S.H.(2007) A study on the development of the ecological planmning method for environmentally friendly urban management. University of Seoul graduate school dissertation for the degree of doctor, 268pp.
  8. Jhonston, J.(1990) Nature areas for city people. A guide to the successful establishment of community wildlife sites. Ecology Handbook 14. London Ecology Unit, London, UK, 116pp.
  9. Kang, B.S.(1999) Research methodology for cause and effect analysis. Muyokpub, Korea, 519pp.
  10. Kim, Y. R.(2001) Development and application evaluation incator for underground water management. Seoul Development Institute, Korea, 170pp.
  11. Lee, K. J.(1999) Biotope mapping in Gangdong-gu, Seoul City. In: Seoul City(ed.), Workshop for classification biotope type in Seoul City, Korea, pp.50-58.
  12. Marsh, S.(1993) Nature conservation in community forests. Ecology Handbook 23. London Ecology Unit, London, UK, 64pp.
  13. Ministry of Environment(2005) Guideline for urban ecological mapping (biotope mapping). Korea, 93pp.
  14. Ministry of Environment(2007) Guideline for urban ecological mapping (biotope mapping). Korea, 104pp.
  15. Ministry of Environment(2008) Method of conservation and restoration according to biotope type(I). Korea, 120pp.
  16. Ra, J. H.(1997) A study on the urban biotope mapping(UBM) and a building of biotop information system(BIS) as a specialized tool in urban landscape planning(I)-. Korean Journal of Traditional Landscape Architecture 15(2): 133-145.
  17. Ratcliffe, D. A.(1977) A nature conservation review. Cambridge University Press, UK, 1: 6-10.
  18. Schaefer, M.(1992) Okologie. Reihe Worterbucher der Biologie.-3. Aufl. Stuttgart u.a.(Gustav Fischer), 433pp.
  19. Seongnam City(2004) A Grade evaluation of biotope and GIS data base of biotope map. Korea, 283pp.
  20. Seoul City(2000) Biotope mapping and guideline for establishment of ecopolis in Seoul(I). Korea, 245pp.
  21. Seoul City(2005) 2005 Seoul biotope map improvement. Korea, 250pp.
  22. Sukopp, H. and S. Weiler(1988) Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the Federal republic of Germany. Landscape and urban planning 15: 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90015-1
  23. Sukopp, H.(1990) Urban ecology and its application in Europe. In: H. Sukopp, S. Hejny, I. Kowarik(ed.), Urban Ecology -plants and plant communities in urban environment-. SPB Academic Publishing bv, Hague, Netherland, pp.1-22.
  24. Sukopp, H., W. Kunick and C. Schneider(1980) Biotope mapping in the built-up areas of West Berlin. Part II. Field methods and evaluation. Garten und Landschaft 7: 565-569.
  25. Zisenis, M.(2006) A framework of values and criteria for interdisciplinary evaluations of nature and landscapes. Ph. D. thesis, Technische Univ. Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 453pp.