Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지

Soil Salinity and Salt Spray Drift Tolerance of Native Trees on the Coastal Windbreaks in the South-Sea, Korea

한국 남해안방풍림 자생수종의 내염성 및 내조성 수종 선발

  • Kim, Do-Gyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, College of Bio Industry Science, Sunchon National Univ.)
  • Published : 2010.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the soil salinity and salt spray drift of the indigenous windbreak trees, and its main purpose was to provide basic data for the selection of salt-tolerant trees in the saline coastal region in the South Sea of Korea. The soil salinity($EC_{1:5}$)was $0.18dSm^{-1}$, which was an average degree of the whole areas of investigation whose salinity degree ranged from $0.05dSm^{-1}$ to $0.58dSm^{-1}$. The level of soil salinity gradually decreased as it moved farther inland, except the belt I. The level of decreasing soil salinity was found to be in the following order: belt II, belt III, belt I, belt IV. The degree of soil salinity was $EC_{1:5}$ $0.22dSm_{1:5}$, $0.22dSm_{1:5}$ $0.19dSm^{-1}$ and $0.13dSm^{-1}$ respectively. The total 110 taxa, which consisted of 45 families, 74 genus, 101 species, and 9 varieties, were found to be tolerant to both soil salinity and salt spray drift. The trees that grow in the highest degree of salinity($EC_{1:5}$ $0.50dSm^{-1}$)were Parthenocissus tricuspidata(Siebold & Zucc.), Planch and Lonicera japonica Thunb. The next group of trees that grow in the high degree of salinity ranging from $EC_{1:5}$ 0.41 to $0.50dSm^{-1}$ was Cudrania tricuspidata(Carr.) Bureau ex Lavall$\acute{e}$e, Rubus parvifolius L., Zanthoxylum schinifolium(Siebold & Zucc.), Hedera rhombea(Miq.) Bean., Robinia pseudoacacia L., Quercus serrata Thunb., Callicarpa dichotoma(Lour.) K. Koch, and so on. The woody species which grew in the entire belts were Pueraria lobata(Willd.) Ohwi and Vitis flexuosa Thunb., and Vitex rotundifolia L. f. which was known to be highly tolerant to salt spray drift was found only in belt I. The woody species with high important value(IV) were Zelkova serrata(Thunb.) Makino., Celtis sinensis Pers., Koelreuteria paniculata Laxmann, Mallotusjaponicus(Thunb.) Muell. Arg., Trachelospermum asiaticum(Siebold & Zucc.) NAKAI, and Pueraria lobata(Willd.) Ohwi. These species were classified as native windbreak trees that are comparatively more tolerant to salt spray drift than other kinds.

본 연구는 염해지역의 식재수종 선발에 대한 기초자료로 활용하고자 한국 남해안 방풍림 자생수목의 토양염분에 대한 내성과 염분비산 영향을 미치는 지대별 토양염분도와 출현수종을 조사 분석하였다. 조사지의 토양염분 $EC_{1:5}$는 전체 평균 $0.18dSm^-1$이었고, 최저 $0.05dSm^{-1}$, 최고 $0.58dSm^{-1}$이었다. 토양염분($EC_{1:5}$)은 I 지대를 제외하고는 해안 정선으로 부터 내륙으로 갈수록 낮았으며, II 지대>llI지대>I 지대>IV지대 순으로 각각 $EC_{1:5}$ $0.22dSm^{-1}$ $0.22dSm^{-1}$ $0.19dSm^{-1}$ $0.13dSm^{-1}$이었다. 출현한 자생식물은 45과 74속 9변종 100종 총 110분류군이었다. 토양염분이 가장 높은 단계인 $EC_{1:5}$ $0.50dSm^{-1}$를 초과하는 곳에 출현한 식물은 담쟁이덩굴과 안동이였으며, 그 다음으로 $EC_{1:5}$ $0.41{\sim}dSm^{-1}$까지 자생하는 식물은 꾸지뽕나무, 멍석딸기, 산초나무, 송악, 아까시나무, 졸참나무, 좀작살나무 퉁이었다. 전제 지대에 출현하는 수종은 정과 새머루이었고, 내조성이 높은 순비기나무는 I 지대에만 출현하였다. 전체 지대에서 중요도가 가장 높온 수종은 느티나무, 팽나무, 모감주나무, 예덕나무, 마삭줄, 칡 등이었다. 이러한 수종은 조사지의 자생 수종들 중에서 다른 수종에 버하여 상대적으로 내조성이 강한 수종으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bonnie Appleton, Vickie Greene, Aileen Smith, Susan French, Brian Kane, Laurie Fox, Adam Downing, and Traci Gilland(2002) Trees and shrubs that tolerate saline soils and salt spray drift. Trees for problem landscape sites. Verginia Cooperative Extension. Publication 430-031.
  2. Braun-Blanquet(1965) Plant sociology: the study of plant communities. Hafner, London, 439pp.
  3. Cho D.S.(2006) Ecological characteristics of plant communities structure and soil environment of coastal dune in Korea. Ph. D. theses, Graduate School of Kunsan National University 153pp.
  4. Choi, M.B.(2003) Selection of tolerant tree species to salt and sea wind -with special reference to the South of western sea areas of Korea. Korean Institute of Forest Recreation. 7(3): 57-66.
  5. Choi, M.G.(1986) Characteristics of salt tolerance in tree species (I) -Relationship between tree species distribution and soil salt concentration in East coastal forest. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 73: 1-8.
  6. Choi, M.G.(1988) Characteristics of salt tolerance in several tree species. Ph. D. thesis. Graduate School, Kangweon National University. 52pp.
  7. Chon, S.U. and J.H. Park(2003) Parameters on physiological responses of Soybean (Glycine max Merr.) to salinity. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture 22(3): 185-191. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2003.22.3.185
  8. Costa, M.L., F. Carrapico and M.C.R. Santos(1996) Contribuicao para o estudo da utilizacao de Azolla no tratamento de aguas residuais domesticas. In Borrego, C., C. Coelho, L. Arroja, C. Boia & E. Figueiredo (eds), Proceedings 5a Conferencia Nacional Sobre a Qualidade do Ambiente 2. Aveiro, Portugal: 1945-1954.
  9. Curtis, J.T. and G. Cottam(1962) Plant ecology workbook: Laboratory field and reference manual. Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, Minnesota. 161pp.
  10. Dana T., D.M. Islay and D.S. Ashley(2005) A field experiment to assess the transplant success of salt marsh plants into tidal wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13: 489-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-004-1727-9
  11. Daubennire, R.E.(1974) Plants and environment. John Wiley & Sons. New York. pp. 46-56.
  12. David Wm. Reed(1996) Water, media and nutrition for greenhouse crops. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL.
  13. Dochinger, L.S. and A.M. Townsend(1979) Effects of roadside deicer salts-and ozone- on red maple progenies. Environ. Pollut. 19: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9327(79)90045-4
  14. Francois, L.E.(1987) Salinity effect on asparagus yield and vegetative growth. J. am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112(3): 432-436.
  15. Garciia-Saanchez, F., J.L. Jifon, M. Carvajaland and J.P. Syvertsen(2002) Gas exchange, chlorophyll and nutrient contents in relation to Na+ and Cl- accumulation on 'Sunburst' mandarin grafted on different root stocks. Plant Sci. 162: 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00010-9
  16. Greenway, H. and R. Munns.(1980) Mechanism of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 149-90. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053
  17. Hass, J.(1993) Effect of saline irrigation on early growth of Eucalyptus gomphocephala and Acacia saligna. Environmental Conservation 20: 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900037644
  18. Homma Akira(1973) Bulletin of the institute of landscape architecture No 4 -Studies on the problems of planting for landscape in the area reclaimed foreshore land. Laboratory of landscape architecture, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 127pp.
  19. Jenny, H.(1941) Factors of soil formation: A system of quantitative Pedolog. Dover Pub., Mineola, N.Y.
  20. Jung, Y.S., J.H Joo., S.D. Hong., I.B. Lee and H.M. Ro(2001) Discussion on dilution factor for electrical conductivity measure by saturation-past extract and 1:5 soil to water extract, and CEC of Korean soils. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 34(1): 71-75.
  21. Kim, D.G.(2009) Native Trees that Tolerate Saline Soil and Salt Spray Drift at the Coastal Windbreaks in the South-Sea, Korea. Pro. Kor. Soc. Env. Con. 19(2): 77-80.
  22. Kim, K.H., and C.M. Park(1998) Growth environment and morphological characters of Vitex rotundifolia Communities in Pyonsanbando National Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 12(1): 91-101.
  23. Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture(2007) Landscape design standards Kimoondang, Seoul, 356pp.
  24. Lee, J.S. and Y.J. Kim(1977) Ecological study for the development of salt-tolerant and sea wind-hardness ornamental Trees. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science Vol. 18(2): 215-220.
  25. Lee, J.S.(1980) Ecological study on the exploitation of salt-tolerant and sea windy-hardness landscape trees -with special reference to the Southern Area of Korea. The Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 8(1): 13-19.
  26. Lee, T.B.(1993) Illustrated flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, 993pp.
  27. Liu, G.M., J.S. Yang, and R.J. Yao(2006) Electrical conductivity in soil extracts: Chemical Factors and there intensity. Soil Science Society of China 16(1): 100-107.
  28. Major, J.(1951) A functional factorial approach to plant ecology. Ecology 32: 392-412. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931718
  29. McWilliam, J.R.(1986) The national and international importance of drought and salinity. Australian J. Plant Physiol. 13: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9860001
  30. Menninger, E.A.(1964) Seaside plants of the world. Hearthside Press, Inc., New York, 303pp.
  31. Miyamoto, I., M. Martinez, A.P. Padilla and D. Ornelas(2004) Landscape plant lists for salt tolerance assessment. U.S.D.I. Bureau of Reclamation, pp.1-13.
  32. Miyamoto, S.(2008) Salt tolerance of landscape plants common to the South west. Texas Water Resources Institute TR 2008-316, pp.1-37.
  33. Odum, E.P.(1971) Fundamental of Ecology. PA: W.B. Saunders, Co. Philadelphia: 574pp.
  34. Oh, K.K.(1986) A Study on planting design criteria on the basis of ecological characteristics of natural vegetation. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Environmental Studies Seoul National University, 155pp.
  35. Park, J.M. and S.K. Lee(2004) Study on the growth characteristics of Vitex rotundifolia seedlings for extension of rehabilitation plant -Mainly on the tolerance to the salt concentration of soil. Jour. Korea Soc. For. Eng. Tech. 2(3): 237-246.
  36. Pezeshki, S. and J. Chambers(1992) Response of Pinustaeda L. to soil flooding and salinity. Ann. Sci. For. 49: 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19920205
  37. Rhoades J.D. and S. Miyamoto(1990) Testing soils for salinity and sodicity. In: R.L. Westerman(Third ed.) Soil testing and plant analysis. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp.299-336.
  38. Richard, B. and I.H. Walter(1996) Adaptations to environmental change in Marine fauna. Mangrove Ecology Workshop Manual Ed., IIka C. Feller. Marsha Sitnik. Smithsonian Institution. Washington DC., 135pp.
  39. Richards, L.A.(1954) Origin and nature of saline and alkali soils. In: Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural Handbook No: 60. USDA, Washington, D.C., USA, pp.1-6.
  40. Sixto, H., J.K. Grau, N. Alba and R. Alíia(2005) Response to sodium chloride in different species and clones of genus Populus L. Forestry 78: 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpi009
  41. US Salinity Laboratory Staff(1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. USDA Handbook 60: 157pp.