Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer (한국토양비료학회지)

Korean Society of Soil Science and Fertilizer (한국토양비료학회)
권호 표지

Estimation of Carbon Emission and Application of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) from Barely (Hordeum vulgare L.) Production System

보리의 생산과정에서 발생하는 탄소배출량 산정 및 전과정평가 적용

  • 소규호 (국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 박정아 (에코네트워크(주)) ;
  • 이길재 (농업기술실용화재단) ;
  • 유종희 (국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 심교문 (국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과) ;
  • 노기안 (국립농업과학원 농업환경부 기후변화생태과)
  • Received : 2010.09.30
  • Accepted : 2010.10.15
  • Published : 2010.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to estimate the carbon footprint and to establish the database of the LCI (Life Cycle Inventory) for barely cultivation system. Barley production system was separated into the naked barley, the hulled barley and the two-rowed barley according to type of barley species. Based on collecting the data for operating LCI, it was shown that input of fertilizer was the highest value of 9.52E-01 kg $kg^{-1}$ for two-rowed braley. For LCI analysis focussed on the greenhouse gas (GHG), it was observed that carbon footprint were 1.25E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ naked braley, 1.09E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ hulled braley and 1.71E+00 $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ two-rowed barley; especially two-rowed barley cultivation system had highest emission value as 1.09E+00 kg $CO_2$ $kg^{-1}$ barley. It might be due to emit from mainly fertilizer production for barley cultivation. Also $N_2O$ was emitted at 7.55E-04 kg $N_2O\;kg^{-1}$ barley as highest value from hulled barley cultivation system because of high N fertilizer input. The result of life cycle impcat assessment (LCIA), it was observed that most of carbon emission from barely cultivation system was mainly attributed to fertilizer production and cropping unit. Characterization value of GWP was 1.25E+00 (naked barley), 1.09E+00 (hulled barley) and 1.71E+00 (two-rowed barely) kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$, respectively.

보리생산체계의 탄소성적을 평가하기 위하여 쌀보리, 겉보리, 맥주보리로 구분하여 LCI database 구축하고 전과정 영향평가를 통한 잠재적 환경영향을 평가하였다. LCI 구축을 위한 영농 투입물과 산출물에 대한 데이터 수집결과 맥주보리의 경우 전반적인 투입량이 맥종 중 가장 높았으며, 특히 비료투입량이 9.52E-01 kg $kg^{-1}$ two-rowed braley로 다른 품종에 비해 월등히 높았으며, 이에 따른 포장에서의 직접대기배출량 ($CO_2$, $CH_4$, $N_2O$)도 9.74E-02 kg $kg^{-1}$ two-rowed braley로 가장 높게 나타났다. LCI 분석 결과 쌀보리, 겉보리, 맥주보리의 탄소성적 값은 각각 1.25E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ naked braley, 1.09E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ hulled braley, 1.71E+00 $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$ two-rowed barley였다. 영농투입량이 가장 많은 맥주보리의 탄소성적이 가장 높았다. $CO_2$는 주로 비료생산공정과 보리생산에서 발생하며, 품종 중에서 맥주보리의 $CO_2$ 발생이 1.09E+00 kg $CO_2$ $kg^{-1}$ barley으로 가장 높았다. $N_2O$는 질소시비에 의한 재배 포장의 배출량이 가장 많았고, 특히 질소시비량이 가장 많은 겉보리가 재배 중 직접배출량이 가장 많았고 값은 7.55E-04 kg $N_2O\;kg^{-1}$ barley였다. 전과정 영향평가 수행결과 GWP의 특성화 값은 쌀보리, 겉보리, 맥주보리가 각각 1.25E+00, 1.09E+00, 1.71E+00 kg $CO_2$-eq. $kg^{-1}$이었고, GWP 값에 영향을 주는 보리생산체계의 주요 요인는 비료생산과 보리재배 작업이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 농촌진흥청. 1989. 농업지대별 작목배치도. p. 741.
  2. 환경부. 2004. 환경성적표지 작성지침 및 인증기준. 환경 부고시 제2004-26호.
  3. 환경부. 2009. 탄소성적표지 인증제품 현황.
  4. IPCC (Intergovernmental Pannel on Climate Change), 2001. Climate change 2001, Radioactive forcing of climate change, The scientific basis. Cambridge University press, UK. pp. 388-390.
  5. IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H. S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). IGES, Japan.
  6. Iserman, K. 1994. Agriculture's share in the emissions of trace gases affecting the climate and some cause oriented proposal for reducing this share, Environ. Pollut. 83:95-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(94)90027-2
  7. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006. ISO 14040:2006(E) Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.
  8. ISO 14025. 2006. Environmental labelling and declarations. Type III environmental declarations. Principles and procedures. International Standard. ISO, Geneva, pp. 25.
  9. KCPA (Korea Crop Protection association). 2007. Agrochemical use guide book. Korea Crop Protection association. Seoul, Korea.
  10. KCPA (Korea Crop Protection association). 2007. Agrochemical year book. Korea Crop Protection association. Seoul, Korea.
  11. KFIA (Korea Fertilizer Industry Association). 2007. fertilizer production data. Korea Fertilizer Industry Association. Seoul, Korea. www. fert-kfia.or.kr.
  12. KWA (Korea Waste Association). 2007. Agricultural waste data. Korea Waste Association. Seoul, Korea. www. kwaste. or. kr/data/
  13. Lee, S.K. and J.S. Suh. 1993. Emission of Greenhouse in the agricultural environment. 1. The cropping system and emssion of the greenhouse -$CO_{2}$, $CH_{4}$, $N_{2}O$- under different cropping system. Journal of Korean soc. soil sci. fert. 26:49-56.
  14. MIFAFF (Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheres). 2004. A study on Establishing effective management system for equipped agricultural input wastes. C2004-A1. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheres. Seoul, Korea.
  15. NAQS (National Agricultural production Quality management Service). 2006. cultivation trend of Major crops.
  16. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2008. 2007 Agro-livestock incomes data book. Rural Development Administration. Suwon, Korea.
  17. Shim, K.M., J.T. Lee, Y.S. Lee, and G.Y. Kim. 2004. Recalssification of winter barley cultivation zone in Korea based on recent evidences and in climate change. Korean J. of Agricultural and Forest meteorology. 6: 218-234.