Comparative Efficacy for Dressing Methods of Iodine on Infected Full Thickness Skin Wound in the Mouse

흰 쥐의 감염된 전층피부 결손에서 Iodine의 드레싱 방법에 따른 창상치유 효과의 비교

  • Lee, Jong-Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, Yo-Han (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Min, Kyung-Hee (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Hong, Sung-Hee (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Mi (Department of Pathology, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Chae, Jeong-Don (Laboratory Medicine, Eulji General Hospital, College of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Jun, Jin-Hyun (Department of Bio-Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Science, Eulji University)
  • 이종훈 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김요한 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 민경희 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 홍성희 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이원미 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 병리학교실) ;
  • 채정돈 (을지대학교 의과대학 을지병원 진단검사의학교실) ;
  • 전진현 (보건과학대학 임상병리학과)
  • Received : 2009.11.03
  • Accepted : 2010.01.22
  • Published : 2010.05.10

Abstract

Purpose: Iodine has been used for the prevention or management of wound infection as a topical agent. Although iodine was widely used mainly by Betadine$^{(R)}$ and cadexomer iodine, there was no comparative study on the efficacies of dressing methods of iodine. And also it's wound healing effect was not yet clear. The purpose of this study is to compare antibacterial effects and wound healing effects associated with various dressing methods of iodine on infected full thickness skin defect in the mouse. Methods: One full thickness skin defects in the mice (n=60) were developed on the back and left open for twenty-four hours. Sixty mice were divided into four groups : group S (dressing with Betadine$^{(R)}$ soaking, n=15), group T (dressing with Betadine$^{(R)}$ topping, n=15), group I (dressing with Iodosorb$^{(R)}$, n=15), group G (control group, dressing with dry gauze, n=15). The size of the wound defects and the grades of wound healing were evaluated in 4, 7, 10 days, and antibacterial effect was evaluated with restricted zone in Mueller Hinton agar by disk diffusion method. Results: After the wound was left open for twenty-four hours, many Staphylococcus aureus were cultured. The wound defect size was decreased in order of Betadine$^{(R)}$ soaking, Iodosorb$^{(R)}$, Betadine$^{(R)}$ topping and gauze dressing group in all days, but difference among experimental groups was not statistically significant. The grade score of wound healing was increased in order of Betadine$^{(R)}$ soaking, Iodosorb$^{(R)}$, Betadine$^{(R)}$ topping and gauze dressing group, and the difference was statistically significant. Antibacterial effect for S. aureus was increased in order of Iodosorb$^{(R)}$, Betadine$^{(R)}$ soaking, Betadine$^{(R)}$ topping and gauze dressing group, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Selection of the effective dressing method of iodine for infected wounds remains a controversial decision. According to this study, Iodosorb$^{(R)}$ may be most effective method for antibacterial effect and Betadine$^{(R)}$ soaking may be most effective method for infected wound healing. However, further study is necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of dressing methods of iodine and to search for the mechanisms that explain their effects.

Keywords

References

  1. Pyo HC, Kim YK, Whang KU, Park YL, Eun HC: A comparative study of cytotoxicity of topical antimicrobials to cultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Korean J Dermatol 33: 895, 1995
  2. Ellenhorn JD, Smith DD, Schwarz RE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG, McGonigle KF, Wagman LD, Paz IB: Paint-only is equivalent to scrub-and-paint in preoperative preparation of abdominal surgery sites. J Am Coll Surg 201: 737, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.023
  3. White RJ, Cutting K, Kingsley A: Topical antimicrobials in the control of wound bioburden. Ostomy Wound Manage 52: 26, 2006
  4. Mertz PM, Oliveira-Gandia MF, Davis S: The evaluation of a cadexomer iodine wound dressing on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in acute wounds. Dermatol Surg 25: 89, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08055.x
  5. Leitch IO, Kucukcelebi A, Robson MC: Inhibition of wound contraction by topical antimicrobials. Aust N Z J Surg 63: 289, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb00385.x
  6. Vehmeyer-Heeman M, Van den Kerckhove E, Gorissen K, Boeckx W: Povidone-iodine ointment: no effect of split skin graft healing time. Burns 31: 489, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2004.11.018
  7. Misra A, Nanchahal J: Use of gauze soaked in povidone iodine for dressing acute open wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 111: 2105, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000057076.71217.B2
  8. Rackur H: New aspects of mechanism of action of povidone-iodine. J Hosp Infect 6 suppl A: 13, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6701(85)80041-4
  9. Zamora JL, Price MF, Chaung P, Gentry LO: Inhibition of povidone-iodine's bactericidal activity by common organic substances: An experimental study. Surgery 98: 25, 1985
  10. Reimer K, Wichelhaus TA, Schafer V, Rudolph P, Kramer A, Wutzler P, Ganzer D, Fleischer W: Antimicrobial effectiveness of povidone-iodine and consequences for new application areas. Dermatology 1: 114, 2002
  11. Bennett LL, Rosenblum RS, Perlov C, Davidson JM, Barton RM, Nanney LB: An in vivo comparison of topical agents on wound repair. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 675, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200109010-00011
  12. Pietsch J, Meakins JL: Complications of povidone-iodine absorption in topically treated burn patients. Lancet 1: 280, 1976
  13. Laudanska H, Gustavson B: In-patient treatment of chronic varicose venous ulcers. A randomized trial of cadexomer iodine versus standard dressings. J Int Med Res 16: 428, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1177/030006058801600604
  14. Skog E, Arnesjo B, Troeng T, Gjores JE, Bergljung L, Gundersen J, Hallbook T, Hessman Y, Hillstrom L, Mansson T, Eilard U, Ekloff B, Plate G, Norgren L: A randomized trial comparing cadexomer iodine and standard treatment in the out-patient management of chronic venous ulcers. Br J Dermatol 109: 77, 1983
  15. Mertz PM, Oliviera-Gandia MF, Davis SC: The evaluation of a cadexomer iodine wound dressing on methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in acute wounds. Dermatol Surg 25: 89, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08055.x