촌구인영대비맥법화오장맥법적결합(寸口人迎对比脉法和五脏脉法的结合)

A combination of the Chon-gu/Inyeong Pulse Comparison Diagnosis and the Five Viscera Pulse

  • 정창현 (경희대학교 한의과대학 원전학교실)
  • Jeong, Chang-Hyun (Dept. of Oriental Medical Classics, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyunghee University)
  • 투고 : 2010.08.23
  • 심사 : 2010.09.18
  • 발행 : 2010.09.25

초록

Since ${\ll}$Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)${\gg}$ and ${\ll}$Nangyeong(難經)${\gg}$, there has been various methods in pulse diagnosis. The Chon-gu(寸口)/Inyeong(人迎) Pulse Comparison Diagnosis which is dealt with in many chapters of the ${\ll}$Hwangjenaegyeong${\gg}$, has not been as widely applied as the Chon-gu Pulse Diagnosis due to several limitations. In this paper, we will review these limitations and suggest an alternative method. In the Chon-gu/Inyeong Pulse Comparison Diagnosis, we compare the Chon-gu Pulse and the Inyeong Pulse to see which is larger than the other by times, and diagnose illness of the 12 Meridian Pulse. It is fairly clear which is larger than the other, but to determine by how much accurately is quite difficult to say. However if we combine the Five Viscera Pulse in application, it becomes far more easier to determine which viscera and bowel is ill. First, study the pulse of the Chon-gu and In-yeong, then determine the Viscera Pulse. Next, determine the larger pulse between the Chon-gu and In-yeong pulse.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 凌耀星 主编. 难经校注. 北京. 人民卫生出版社. 1991. p.9.
  2. 李圭晙. 素问大要. 首尔. 大星出版社. 2003. pp.241-244, 264.
  3. 黄元德, 金重汉. 关于气口脉诊法之脏腑配属的研究. 大韩原典医史学会志. 12卷1号. 首尔. 1999. pp.245-250.
  4. 王洪圖 總主編, 黃帝內經硏究大成, 北京. 北京出版社, 1997. p.1332, 1337.
  5. 洪元植. 精校黄帝内经灵枢. 首尔. 东洋医学研究院. 1985. p.124, 221, 222, 310.
  6. 洪元植. 精校黄帝内经素问. 首尔. 东洋医学研究院. 1985. p.37, 92.
  7. 许浚. 原本东医宝鑑. 首尔. 南山堂. 1991. p.293.
  8. 文淵閣 四庫全書, 電子版.