보건교육건강증진학회지 (Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion)

  • 제27권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1-14
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-4128(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2635-5302(eISSN)
한국보건교육건강증진학회 (Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion)
권호 표지

초등학생의 일상적 신체활동 측정 도구 개발을 위한 예비조사

Developing an Instrument to Evaluate Habitual Physical Activity Level of Elementary School-aged Children in Large Populations: A Preliminary Study

  • An, Ji-Yeon (Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Tak, Young-Ran (Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.14
  • 심사 : 2010.12.11
  • 발행 : 2010.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구는 초등학생의 신체활동 정도를 사정할 수 있는 도구를 개발하기 위한 탐색적 연구이다. 방법: 본 연구는 도구개발과정과 예비조사(preliminary study)로 구분되어 있다. 신체활동의 구성요인 규명, 초기문항 작성, 내용타당도 검증, 최종도구 고안, 문항분석, 신뢰도 및 타당도 분석을 통해 총 41문항의 자가 보고식 설문지를 개발하였다. 예비조사는 서울시 소재 국공립 초등학교에 재학중인 초등학생 총 28명을 대상으로 이루어졌고 만보계와 Borg's scale을 이용하여 동시타당도 검증을 실시하였다. 결과: 예비조사 결과, 개발된 도구는 높은 내적 일관성을 보였고(cronbach's alpha=.89), 준거타당도를 위한 준거지표와의 Spearman correlation coefficient analysis에서는 만보계에 의해 측정된 도보수 (r=.69, p<.001)와 주관적 운동강도를 측정한 Borg's scale 점수(r=.76, p<.001)와 각각 양의 상관관계를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 본 연구에서 개발된 도구는 초등학생의 신체활동 종류, 빈도, 강도 및 시간을 측정할 수 있도록 구성된 자가보고식 형태로 초등학생의 일상적인 신체활동을 측정할 수 있는 도구로 평가되었다. 비록 신체활동을 객관적으로 측정한 도구는 아니지만 신체활동 정도를 파악하기 위해 대규모 대상자에게 적용할 수 있는 실용적인 도구가 될 수 있을 것이다.

Objectives: This study is an explorative study for developing an instrument to measure habitual physical activity level of school-aged children. Methods: HPAQ-S consists of 41 items and a self-reported 5-day recall instrument designed to assess habitual physical activity level for school-aged children. For the validity and reliability test, a sample consisted of 28 children, aged 10-11 years old. Results: 41 question items showed an acceptable internal consistency (cronbach's alpha=.89). A significant positive correlation with the pedometer results (r=.69, p<.001) and with Borg's questionnaire (r=.76, p<.001) support the validity of HPAQ-S. Conclusion: HPAQ-S may be more useful for measuring habitual physical activity level of elementary school-aged children in large populations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ainsworth, B.E., Haskell, W.L., Leon, A.S., Jacobs, D.R., Montoye, H.J., Montoye, J.F., Sallis, R.S. Paffenbarger 1998. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25(1): 71-80.
  2. Bailey, R.C., Olsen, J., Pepper, S.L., Porszaz, J., Barstow, T.I., Cooper, D.M. 1995. The level and tempo of children's physical activities: An observation study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27(1): 1033-1041. https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199507000-00012
  3. Bassett, D.R., Cureton, A.L., Ainsworth, B.E. 2000. Measurement of daily walking distance-questionnaire versus pedometer. Med Sci Sports Exers 32(5): 1018-1023.
  4. Bjorgaas, M., Vik, J.T., Saterhaoug, A., Langlo, L., Sakshaoug, T., Mohus, R.M., Grill, V. 2004. Relationship between pedometer-registered activity, aerobic capacity and self-reported activity and fitness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 7:737-744.
  5. Booth, M.L., Okely, A.D., Chey, T., Bauman, A. 2002. The reliability and validity of the adolescent physical activity recall questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(12): 1986-1995. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200212000-00019
  6. Bouchard, C. 2001. Physical activity and health: introduction to the dose-response symposium. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33(suppl 6): S347-350. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200106001-00002
  7. Bulwer, B.E. 2004. Sedentary lifestyle, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease: from research to practice. Crit Pathw Cardiol 3(4): 184-193.
  8. Casperson, C.J., Powell, K.E., Christenson, G.M. 1985. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 100: 126-131.
  9. Duncan, E.K., Duncan, J.S., Schofield, G. 2008. Pedometer-determined physical activity and active transport in girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 5(2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-5-1
  10. Gale, C.R., Batty, G.D., Deary, I.J. 2008. Locus of control at age 10 years and health outcomes and behaviors at age 30 years: the 1970 British Cohort Study. Psychosom Med 70(4):397-403. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816a719e
  11. Hilberg, T. 2008. Physical activity in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: Epidemiology and Mechanisms. Hamostaseologie 28(1): 9-15.
  12. Kilanowski, C., Consalvi, A., Epstein, L.H. 1999. Validation of an electronic pedometer for measurement of physical activity in children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 11:63-68. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.11.1.63
  13. Kohl, H.W., Fulton, J.E., Casperson, C.J. 2000. Assessment of physical activity among children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Prev Med 31: S54-S76. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0542
  14. Korea National Statistical Office. Report on the Time Use Survey in Korea. Seoul, Korea, 2004.
  15. Park, J.H., Kang, M.S., Lee, M.Y., Kim, H.J., Kang, S.J. 2004. Development of a compendium of physical activities in Korean version and computer software for physical activity records. Korean J Phys Edu 44(2):385-404.
  16. Pate, R.R., Pratt, M., Blair, S.N., Haskell, W.L., Macera, C.A., Bouchard, C., Buchner, D., Ettinger, W., Health, G.W., King, A.C., et al 1995. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Colleage of Sports Medicine. JAMA (5): 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.273.5.402
  17. Ridley, K., Hill, O.T. 2006. The multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescens (MARCA): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 26: 3-10.
  18. Sallis, J.F., Patrick, K. 1994. Physical activity guideline for adolescents: consensus statement. Pediatr Exerc Sci 6: 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.6.4.302
  19. Sallis, J.F., Mckenzie, T.L., Alcaraz, J.E. 1997. Habitual physical activity and health-related physical activity fitness in fourth-grade children. AMA Am J Dis Child 147(8): 890-896.
  20. Shephard, R.J. 2003. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaire. Br J Sports Med 37(3): 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.3.197
  21. Speck, B.J., Looney, S.W. 2006. Self-reported physical activity validated by pedometer: a pilot study. Public Health Nurs 23(1): 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2006.230112.x
  22. Treuth, M.S., Sherwood, N.E., Baranowski, T., Butte, N.F., Jacobs, D.R., McClanahan, B., et al. 2004. Physical activity self-report and accelerometry measures from the Girls Health Enrichment Multi-site Studies. Prev Med 38:S43-S49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.01.001
  23. Trost, S.G., Pate, R.R., Freedson, P.S., Sallis, J.F., Taylor, W.C. 2000. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(2): 426-431. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025
  24. Welk, G.J., Corbin, C.B., Dale, D. 2000. Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 71(2): 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.11082788
  25. Weston, A.T., Petosa, R., Pate, R.R. 1997. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29(1): 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199701000-00020