DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wireless operational modal analysis of a multi-span prestressed concrete bridge for structural identification

  • Whelan, Matthew J. (Clarkson University) ;
  • Gangone, Michael V. (Clarkson University) ;
  • Janoyan, Kerop D. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson University) ;
  • Hoult, Neil A. (Department of Civil Engineering, Queens University) ;
  • Middleton, Campbell R. (Structural Engineering with the Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge) ;
  • Soga, Kenichi (Civil Engineering with the Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge)
  • Received : 2009.10.14
  • Accepted : 2010.01.18
  • Published : 2010.07.25

Abstract

Low-power radio frequency (RF) chip transceiver technology and the associated structural health monitoring platforms have matured recently to enable high-rate, lossless transmission of measurement data across large-scale sensor networks. The intrinsic value of these advanced capabilities is the allowance for high-quality, rapid operational modal analysis of in-service structures using distributed accelerometers to experimentally characterize the dynamic response. From the analysis afforded through these dynamic data sets, structural identification techniques can then be utilized to develop a well calibrated finite element (FE) model of the structure for baseline development, extended analytical structural evaluation, and load response assessment. This paper presents a case study in which operational modal analysis is performed on a three-span prestressed reinforced concrete bridge using a wireless sensor network. The low-power wireless platform deployed supported a high-rate, lossless transmission protocol enabling real-time remote acquisition of the vibration response as recorded by twenty-nine accelerometers at a 256 Sps sampling rate. Several instrumentation layouts were utilized to assess the global multi-span response using a stationary sensor array as well as the spatially refined response of a single span using roving sensors and reference-based techniques. Subsequent structural identification using FE modeling and iterative updating through comparison with the experimental analysis is then documented to demonstrate the inherent value in dynamic response measurement across structural systems using high-rate wireless sensor networks.

Keywords

References

  1. Aktan, A.E., Catbas, N., Türer, A. and Zhang, A. (1998), "Structural identification: analytical aspects", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 124(7), 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:7(817)
  2. Allemang, R.J. (2003), "The modal assurance criterion (MAC): twenty years of use and abuse", Sound Vib. Mag., 37(8), 14-21.
  3. Catbas, F.N., Brown, D.L and Aktan, A.E. (2006), "Use of modal flexibility for damage detection and condition assessment: case studies and demonstrations on large structures", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 132(11), 1699-1712. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1699)
  4. Hamed, E. and Frostig, Y. (2006), "Natural frequencies of bonded and unbonded prestressed beams-prestress force effects", J. Sound Vib., 295(1-2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.032
  5. Jaishi, B. and Ren, W.X. (2005), "Structural finite element updating using ambient vibration test results", J. Struct. Eng.-ASCE, 131(4), 617-628. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:4(617)
  6. MacNeal, R.H. (1994), Finite Elements: their design and performance, Marcel Dekker, USA.
  7. Morassi, A. and Tonon, S. (2008), "Dynamic testing for structural identification of a bridge", J. Bridge Eng., 13(6), 573-585. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:6(573)
  8. Peeters, B. (2000), System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering, PhD Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
  9. Toksoy, T. and Aktan, A.E. (1994), "Bridge condition assessment by modal flexibility", Exp. Mech., 34(3), 271- 278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319765
  10. Whelan, M.J. and Janoyan, K.D. (2009), "Design of a robust, high-rate wireless sensor network for static and dynamic structural monitoring", J. Intel. Mat. Syst. Str., 20(7), 849-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X08098768
  11. Whelan, M.J., Gangone, M.V., Janoyan, K.D. and Jha, R. (2009a), "In-service modal analysis of a highway bridge using a real-time wireless sensor network", Eng. Struct., 31(10), 2224-2235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.022
  12. Whelan, M.J., Gangone, M.V. and Janoyan, K.D. (2009b), "Highway bridge assessment using an adaptive realtime wireless sensor network", IEEE Sens. J., 9(11), 1405-1413. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2026546

Cited by

  1. Develoment of high-sensitivity wireless strain sensor for structural health monitoring vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2013.11.5.477
  2. Structural identification of a tied arch bridge using parallel genetic algorithms and ambient vibration monitoring with a wireless sensor network 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0266-z
  3. Bridge model updating using distributed sensor data vol.170, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00030
  4. Analysis of Fiber-Optic Strain-Monitoring Data from a Prestressed Concrete Bridge vol.22, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000996
  5. Probabilistic Assessment of High-Throughput Wireless Sensor Networks vol.16, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/s16060792
  6. A Synchronized Wireless Sensor Network for Experimental Modal Analysis in Structural Health Monitoring vol.26, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00718.x
  7. Effect of prestressing on the natural frequency of PSC bridges vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2016.17.2.241
  8. Effects of prestressing force on natural frequency of prestressed concrete beams considering self-weight vol.74, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.4.495