Effect of Ionizing Radiation and Mercury Chloride (II) on Cell Morphology in Yeast Cells Frequently and Temporarily Treated with Both Stressors

방사선과 염화수은의 일시 및 반복 복합 처리된 효모세포의 산화적 스트레스 적응과 형태 변화

  • 김수현 (한국원자력연구원 방사선과학연구소) ;
  • 김진규 (한국원자력연구원 방사선과학연구소)
  • Received : 2010.01.12
  • Accepted : 2010.05.25
  • Published : 2010.06.01

Abstract

Metal ions are essential to life. However, some metals such as mercury are harmful, even when present at trace amounts. Toxicity of mercury arises mainly from its oxidizing properties. Ionizing radiation (IR) is an active tool for destruction of cancer cells and diagnosis of diseases, etc. IR induces DNA double strand breaks in the nucleus, In addition, it causes lipid peroxidation, ceramide generation, and protein oxidation in the membrane, cytoplasm and nucleus. Yeasts have been a commonly used material in biological research. In yeasts, the physiological response to changing environmental conditions is controlled by the cell types. Growth rate, mutation and environmental conditions affect cell size and shape distributions. In this work, the effect of IR and mercury chloride (II) on the morphology of yeast cells were investigated. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells were treated with IR, mercury chloride (II) and IR combined with mercury chloride (II). Non-treated cells were used as a control group. Morphological changes were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The half-lethal condition from the previous experimental results was used to the IR combined with mercury. Yeast cells were exposed to 400 and 800 Gy at dose rates of 400Gy $hr^{-1}$ or 800 Gy $hr^{-1}$, respectively. Yeast cells were treated with 0.05 to 0.15 mM mercury chloride (II). Oxidative stress can damage cellular membranes through a lipidic peroxidation. This effect was detected in this work, after treatment of IR and mercury chloride (II). The cell morphology was modified more at high doses of IR and high concentrations of mercury chloride(II). IR and mercury chloride (II) were of the oxidative stress. Cell morphology was modified differently according to the way of oxidative stress treatment. Moreover, morphological changes in the cell membrane were more observable in the frequently stress treated cells than the temporarily stress treated cells.

Keywords

References

  1. 김진규. 2001. 환경재해 방지를 위한 생물정보로서의 사람 림프구 DNA 손상에 대한 방사선과 살충제의 상승작용. 환경생물. 19:19-24.
  2. Aleo MF, F Morandini, F Bettoni, S Tanganelli, A Vezzola, R Giuliani, N Steimberg, P Apostoli and G Mazzoleni. 2002. Antioxidant potential and gap junction-mediated intercellular communication as early biological markers of mercury chloride toxicity in the MDCK cell line. Toxicol. in Vitro 16:457-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-2333(02)00030-9
  3. Bennett CB, LK Lewis, G Karthikeyan, KS Lobachev, YH Jin, JF Sterling, JR Snipe and MA Resnick. 2001. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. NAT GENET 29: 426-434 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng778
  4. Bonin S, W Wzorek and L Koper. 2006. Influence of longtime continuous wine fermentation on yeast immobilized on foam glass. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria. 5:25-38.
  5. Coelho MAZ, I Belo, R Pinheiro, AL Amaral, M Mota, JAP Coutinho and EC Ferreira. 2004. Effect of hyperbaric stress on yeast morphology: study by automated image analysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 66: 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1648-9
  6. Emanelli T, JB Racha, ME Pereira, LO Porciuncula, VM Morsch, AF Martins and DO Souza. 1996. Effect of mercuric chloride intoxication and dimercaprol treatment on delta-aminolevulinate dehydratase from brain, liver and kidney of adult mice. Pharmcol. Toxicol. 79:136-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1996.tb00257.x
  7. Goyer RA. 1991. Toxic effects of metal. Casarett Doll's Toxicol. 4:646-651.
  8. Gueldry O, M Lazard, F Delort, M Dauplais, I Grigoras, S Blanquet and P Plateau. 2003. Ycf1p-dependent Hg (II) detoxification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 270: 2486-2496. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03620.x
  9. Hartwig A. 1995. Current aspects I metal genotoxicity. Biometals 8:3-11.
  10. Jamieson DJ. 1998. Oxidative stress responses of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:1511-1527. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199812)14:16<1511::AID-YEA356>3.0.CO;2-S
  11. Keifer J. 1989. Biological Radiation Effects. Springer Verlag. Berlin. 444pp.
  12. Migliore L, L Cocchi, C Nesti and E Sabbioni. 1999. Micronuclei assay and FISH analysis in human lymphocytes treated with six metal salts. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 34:279-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1999)34:4<279::AID-EM8>3.0.CO;2-7
  13. Onken U and E Liefke. 1989. Effect of total and partial pressure (oxygen and carbon dioxide) on aerobic microbial processes. pp.137-169. In Advances In Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology (Riechter A ed.). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York.
  14. Panek A, JK Kim and A Cebulska-Wasliewa. 2001. In Vitro studies of repair efficiency of DNA damage induced by Xrays in lymphocytes exposed to mercury. 12nd Symposium of Polish Radiation Research Society, Sept. 10-12, 2001, Krakow, Poland.
  15. Salmon JM, P Vuchot, T Doco and M Moutounet. 2003. Maintenance and protection of yeast morphology by contact with wine polyphenols during simulation of wine aging on Lees. Food Microbiol. Safety. 68:1782-1787.
  16. Stohs SJ and D Bagchi. 1995. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 18:321-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(94)00159-H
  17. Sunner J, R Avci, L Richards, G Groenewold, J Ingram and M Arthun. 2003. Preservation of yeast cell morphology for scanning electron microscopy using 3.28-${\mu}M$ IR laser irradiation. J. Microbiol. Methods 54:285-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00041-1
  18. Woo HJ, JH Kim, A Cebulska-Wasilewska and JK Kim. 2006. Evaluation of DNA damage by mercury chloride (II) and ionizing radiation in HeLa cells. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 24:46-52.
  19. Youm JH, DH Koh, JY Kim and NS Kim. 2000. Changes on the methylmercury-induced cytotoxicity by control of cell membrane transport system. Korean J. Environ. Health. Soc. 26:88-96.