An Investigation on the Impact of Website Contents on Internet Auction Success

  • Ryu, Chung-Suk (College of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31

초록

This study investigates the impact of website contents on Internet auction success. Based on the marketing concepts of stimuli, consumer behavior, and product involvement, the research model presents the theoretical relationships between the key factors of website contents and Internet auction performance. This study examines particularly four dimensions of website contents including transaction features, auction-specific features, seller's reputation, and information quality, which are deemed to have significant impact on the Internet auction performance, Each dimension of website contents is hypothesized to have a unique impact on a bidder's decision-making, which may vary depending on the bidder's level of involvement in the product. While transaction and auction-specific features serve as necessary components for successful auctions, a seller's reputation and information quality, as parts of satisfactory requirements, acutely affect bidders' decisions, especially those with high involvement to buy the product through a particular auction site. The outcomes of the analysis, in general, support the proposed model. The study results also provide meaningful Implications on ways in which auction websites can be improved for both sellers and auction service providers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior Prentice-Hall, N.J., 1980.
  2. Anderson, S., Milam, G., Friedman, D., and Singh, N., "Buy It Now: A Hybrid Internet Market Institution," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2008, pp. 137-153.
  3. Andrews, T. and Benzing, C., "The Determinants of Price in Internet Auctions of Used Cars," Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2007, pp. 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-006-9045-7
  4. Antil, J.H., "Conceptualization and operationalization of involvement," Advances in consumer research, Vol. 11, 1984, pp. 203-209.
  5. Bajari, P. and Hortacsu, A., "Economic Insights from Internet Auctions," Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2004, pp. 457-486. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051041409075
  6. Baker, J. and Song, J., "A Review of Single-Item Internet Auction Literature and a Model for Future Research," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp. 43-68. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2007010103
  7. Baker, J. and Song, J., "Exploring Decision Rules for Sellers in Business-to-Consumer (B2C) Internet Auctions," International Journal of E-Business Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1-21.
  8. Baker, W.E. and Lutz, R.J., "An empirical test of an updated relevance-accessibility model of advertising effectiveness," Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2000, pp. 1-14.
  9. Beam, C. and Segev, A., "Auctions on the Internet: A Field Study," Working paper, 1998, pp. 1-33.
  10. Beauregard, T.R., "Linking Internet strategy to high-quality, cost-effective managed care," Benefits Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2000, pp. 15-19.
  11. Bland, E., Black, G., and Lawrimore, K., "Risk-Reducing and Risk-Enhancing Factors Impacting Online Auction Outcomes: Empirical Evidence From Ebay Auctions," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2007, pp. 236-243.
  12. Bosnjak, M., Obermeier, D., and Tuten, T. L., "Predicting and explaining the propensity to bid in online auctions: a comparison of two action-theoretical models," Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, pp. 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.38
  13. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R., "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, pp. 61-95.
  14. Deters, J.T., "BidOhio: Internet technology earns millions for Ohio taxpayers," AFP Exchange, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2001, pp. 46-49.
  15. Gao, Y., Koufaris, M., and Ducoffe, R.H., "An Experimental Study of the Effects of Promotional Techniques in Web-based Commerce," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2004, pp. 1-20.
  16. Goldsborough, R., "Internet auctions examined," Link-up, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2000, p. 24.
  17. Gregg, D. and Walczak, S., "Dressing Your Online Auction Business for Success: An Experiment Comparing Two Ebay Businesses," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2008, pp. 653-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148860
  18. Halcoussis, D. and Mathews, T., "eBay auctions for Third Eye Blind concert tickets," Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2007, pp. 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-006-9028-1
  19. Hou, J., "Price Determinants in Online Auctions: A Comparative Study of Ebay China and US," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2007, pp. 172-183.
  20. Iivari, J. and Koskela, E., "The PIOCO Model for Information Systems Design," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1987, pp. 401-419. https://doi.org/10.2307/248688
  21. Kauffman, R.J. and Wood, C.A., "Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer's utility in Internet auctions," Information Technology and Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2006, pp. 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-006-9181-4
  22. Keskinocak, P. and Tayur, S., "Quantitative analysis for Internet-enabled supply chains," Interfaces, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2001, pp. 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.31.2.70.10626
  23. Kim, M.-S. and Ahn, J.-H., "Comparison of Trust Sources of an Online Market-Maker in the E-marketplace: Buyer's and Seller's Perspectives," The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2006, pp. 84-94.
  24. Koufaris, M., "Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 205-225. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
  25. Koufaris, M. and Hampton-Sosa, W., "The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers," Information & Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2004, pp. 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004
  26. Liao, G.-Y. and Hwang, J.-J., "A trustworthy Internet auction model with verifiable fairness," Internet Research, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2001, pp. 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240110388215
  27. Lucking-Reiley, D., "Using Field Experiments to Test Equivalence Between Auction Formats: Magic on the Internet," Forthcoming American Economic Review, 1999, pp. 1-32.
  28. Lucking-Reiley, D., "Auctions on the Internet: What's being auctioned, and how?," The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2000, pp. 227-252.
  29. Manjourides, C., "Going once ... going twice ... cybersold!," Link-up, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1999, p.22.
  30. McDonald, C.G. and Jr, V.C.S., "Reputation in an Internet auction market," Economic Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2002, pp. 633-650. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/40.4.633
  31. Mithas, S. and Jones, J., "Do Auction Parameters Affect Buyer Surplus in E-Auctions for Procurement?," Production and Operations Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, pp. 455-470.
  32. Nikitkov, A., "Information Assurance Seals: How They Impact Consumer Purchasing Behavior," Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2006.20.1.1
  33. Palmer, J.W., "Web site usability, design, and performance metrics," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2002, pp. 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.151.88
  34. Pinker, E.J., Seidmann, A., and Vakrat, Y., "Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues," Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 11, 2003, pp. 1457-1484. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.11.1457.20584
  35. Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., and Kavan, C.B., "Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1995, pp. 173-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/249687
  36. Reiley, D.H., "Field experiments on the effects of reserve prices in auctions: more Magic on the Internet," The Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006, pp. 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00012.x
  37. esnick, P., Zeckhauser, R, Swanson, J., and Lockwood, K., "The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment," Experimental Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2006, pp. 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-4309-2
  38. Rezabakhsh, B., Bornemann, D., Hansen, U., and Schrader, U., "Consumer Power: A Comparison of the Old Economy and the Internet Economy," Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2006, pp. 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-005-3307-7
  39. Sashi, CM. and Leary, B.O., "The role of Internet auctions in the expansion of B2B markets," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2002, pp. 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00189-4
  40. Simpson, S., "Bidding on bones," Scientific American, Vol. 282, No. 3, 2000, pp. 33-34. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0300-33
  41. Song, J. and Baker, J., "An integrated model exploring sellers' strategies in eBay auctions," Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2007, pp. 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-007-9001-x
  42. Stern, B.B. and Stafford, M.R., "Individual and social determinants of winning bids in online auctions," Journal of Consumer Behavior, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2006, pp. 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.47
  43. Walczak, S., Gregg, D.G., and Berrenberg, J.L., "Market Decision making for Online Auction Sellers: Profit Maximization or Socialization." Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006, pp. 199-220.
  44. Yu, T. and Wu, G., "Determinants of Internet Shopping Behavior: An Application of Reasoned Behavior Theory," International Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2007, pp. 744-762.
  45. Zmud, R.W., "An Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Concept of Information," Decision Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1978, pp. 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1978.tb01378.x