한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제49권4호
  • /
  • Pages.411-421
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지

수학 교사의 반성적 사고에 관한 고찰 - 평가하기 경우 -

Investigation of mathematics teacher reflection - About Assess instances -

  • Kwon, Na-Young (Department of mathematics Education, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.19
  • 심사 : 2010.11.08
  • 발행 : 2010.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Teacher reflection as a form of professional development has been an enduring interest in education that can be traced back to Dewey. Information about how teachers interpret and analyze their students' learning would help us understand difficulties in teaching and learning. Moreover, it can be useful for teacher education by improving teaching methods. The purpose of this research was to understand how mathematics teachers reflected on their students' understanding. For the purpose of this study, I investigated four U.S.A. mathematics teachers in a middle school. In particular, I discussed Assess instances among the teachers' reflections on their students' thinking and changes of the reflections as time went by. The results showed two different types of Assess instances and shifts by time.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Artzt, A. F., & Amour-Thomas, E. (2002). Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  2. Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what we need to learn. Phi Delta Kappan. 77(7), 511-508.
  3. Black, S. (2001). Thinking about teaching: How teachers can put reflection at the heart of their teaching. The American School Board Journal, 188(11), 42-44.
  4. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge, and action research. Basingstoke, UK: Falmer.
  5. Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report No. RR-43). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE).
  6. Cooney, T. (1998). Conceptualizing the professional development of teachers. In C. Alsina, J. M. Alvares, M. Niss, A. Perez, L. Rico, & A. Sfard (Eds.), The proceedings of the 8th international congress on mathematics education (pp. 101-117).
  7. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
  8. Goldsmith, L., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of model for developing teachers. In E. Fennema & Nelson, S. (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  9. Hall, R. (2000). Video recording as theory. In A. E. Kelly & Lesh, R. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  10. Kwon, N., & Orrill, C. (2007). Understanding a teacher's reflections: a case study of a middle school mathematics teacher. School Science and Mathematics, 107(6), 226-237.
  11. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action London: Temple Smith.
  13. Schon, D. (1991). The reflective turn. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  14. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475-491.
  15. Smyth, J. (1992). Teachers' work and the politics of reflection. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 267-300. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029002268
  16. Wallach, T., & Even, R. (2005). Hearing students: The complexity of understanding what they are saying, showing, and doing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-005-3849-2